skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Improving Engagement in Program Construction Examples for Learning Python Programming
This research is focused on how to support students’ acquisition of program construction skills through worked examples. Although examples have been consistently proven to be valuable for student’s learning, the learning technology for computer science education lacks program construction examples with interactive elements that could engage students. The goal of this work is to investigate the value of the “engaging” features in programming examples. We introduce PCEX, an online tool developed to present program construction examples in an engaging fashion. We also present the results of a controlled study with a between-subject design that was conducted in a large introductory Python programming class to compare PCEX with non-interactive worked examples focused on program construction. The results of our study show the positive impact of interactive program construction examples on student’s engagement, problem-solving performance, and learning.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1822816
PAR ID:
10188375
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Date Published:
Journal Name:
International journal of artificial intelligence in education
Volume:
30
ISSN:
1560-4292
Page Range / eLocation ID:
299-336
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, 18th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research)
    A sizable body of research on instructional practices supports the use of worked examples for acquiring cognitive skills in domains such as mathematics and physics. Although examples are also important in the domain of programming, existing research on programming examples is limited. Program examples are used by instructors to achieve two important goals: to explain program behavior and to demonstrate program construction patterns. Program behavior examples are used to demonstrate the semantics of various program constructs (i.e., what is happening inside a program or an algorithm when it is executed). Program construction examples illustrate how to construct a program that achieves a specific purpose. While both functions of program examples are important for learning, most of the example-focused research in computer science education focused on technologies for augmenting program behavior examples such as program visualization, tracing tables, etc. In contrast, advanced technologies for presenting program construction examples were rarely explored. This work introduces interactive Program Construction Examples (PCEX) to begin a systematic exploration of worked-out program construction examples in the domain of computer science education. A classroom evaluation and analysis of the survey data demonstrated that the usage of PCEX examples is associated with better student's learning and performance. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of 2022 Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education)
    The paper focuses on a new type of interactive learning content for SQL programming - worked examples of SQL code. While worked examples are popular in learning programming, their application for learning SQL is limited. Using a novel tool for presenting interactive worked examples, Database Query Analyzer (DBQA), we performed a large-scale randomized controlled study assessing the value of worked examples as a new type of practice content in a database course. We report the results of the classroom study examining the usage and the impact of DBQA. Among other aspects, we explored the effect of textual step explanations provided by DBQA. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education)
    The paper focuses on a new type of interactive learning content for SQL programming - worked examples of SQL code. While worked examples are popular in learning programming, their application for learning SQL is limited. Using a novel tool for presenting interactive worked examples, Database Query Analyzer (DBQA), we performed a large-scale randomized controlled study assessing the value of worked examples as a new type of practice content in a database course. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2024)
    This paper presents a comparison of two instructional strategies meant to help learners better comprehend code and learn programming concepts: reading code examples annotated with expert explanation (worked-out examples) versus scaffolded self-explanation of code examples using an automated system (Intelligent Tutoring System). A randomized controlled trial study was conducted with 90 university students who were assigned to either the control group (reading worked-out examples, a passive strategy) or the experimental group where participants were asked to self-explain and received help, if needed, in the form of questions from the tutoring system( scaffolded self-explanation, an interactive strategy). We found that students with low prior knowledge in the experimental condition had significantly higher learning gains than students with high prior knowledge. However, in the control condition, this distinction in learning outcomes based on prior knowledge was not observed. We also analyzed the effect of self-efficacy on learning gains and the nature of self-explanation. Low self-efficacy students learn almost twice as much in the interactive condition versus the passive condition although the difference was not significant probably because of low sample size. We also found that high self-efficacy students tend to provide more relational explanations whereas low self-efficacy students provide more multi-structural or line-by-line explanations. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, SIGCSE 2020)
    null (Ed.)
    This paper discusses the results of replicating and extending a study performed by Cooper et al. examining the relationship between students’ spatial skills and their success in learning to program. Whereas Cooper et al. worked with high school students participating in a summer program, we worked with college students taking an introductory computing course. Like Cooper et al.’s study, we saw a correlation between a student’s spatial skills and their success in learning computing. More significantly, we saw that after applying an intervention to teach spatial skills, students demonstrated improved performance both on a standard spatial skills assessment as well as on a CS content instrument. We also saw a correlation between students’ enjoyment in computing and improved performance both on a standard spatial skills assessment and on a CS content instrument, a result not observed by Cooper et al. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email