skip to main content

Title: Energy policy for energy sovereignty: Can policy tools enhance energy sovereignty?
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1934346 1934348 1856059
Publication Date:
Journal Name:
Solar Energy
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
109 to 112
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This paper is part of a larger project investigating the role of politics and policy design on suitability and energy transitions from the FSU participants in the Sustainable Healthy Cities Network. The City of Tallahassee FL is used as a test bed to examine how policy design is linked to individual behavior and outcomes. This specific piece examines voluntary compliance and explores actor motivations to comply with non-mandatory directives. We investigate the conditions and motivations shaping household-level decisions related to voluntary compliance within an energy audit (low-commitment) and a loan (high-commitment) program. We find evidence of different economic and social motivations at play, and discuss the research implications for policy design and implementation.
  2. To address the effects of climate change, it is imperative for economies to proactively invest in, and deploy, low carbon energy technologies to meet current energy demands. To this effect, several states in the U.S. have implemented policies to incentivize the growth of renewable energy technologies. One of these policies is the renewable portfolio standards (RPS), which mandates that a certain percentage of the total electricity sales of utilities be sourced from renewable energy sources. This paper examines the effectiveness of these policies in driving the growth of specific renewable technologies across different regional transmission organizations (RTOs). It evaluates the adoption of renewable energy technologies across these RTOs to provide insights on the varying successes of these policies. The paper develops a ranking system for the correlations between the strength of RPS and renewable energy capacity growth across the RTOs. Two central observations emerge. First, despite the presence of positive correlations between RPS and renewable energy capacity additions, the capacity growth of renewable energy is not monotonic in time as technological differences characterize regional attributes. Second, the technology returns on RPS mandates are location-specific.