skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Math Is for Me: A Field Intervention to Strengthen Math Self-Concepts in Spanish-Speaking 3rd Grade Children
Children’s math self-concepts—their beliefs about themselves and math—are important for teachers, parents, and students, because they are linked to academic motivation, choices, and outcomes. There have been several attempts at improving math achievement based on the training of math skills. Here we took a complementary approach and conducted an intervention study to boost children’s math self-concepts. Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of whether a novel multicomponent intervention—one that combines explicit and implicit approaches to help children form more positive beliefs linking themselves and math—can be administered in an authentic school setting. The intervention was conducted in Spain, a country in which math achievement is below the average of other OECD countries. We tested third grade students ( N = 180; M age = 8.79 years; 96 girls), using treatment and comparison groups and pre- and posttest assessments. A novelty of this study is that we used both implicit and explicit measures of children’s math self-concepts. For a subsample of students, we also obtained an assessment of year-end math achievement. Math self-concepts in the treatment and comparison groups did not significantly differ at pretest. Students in the treatment group demonstrated a significant increase in math self-concepts from pretest to posttest; students in the comparison group did not. In the treatment group, implicit math self-concepts at posttest were associated with higher year-end math achievement, assessed approximately 3 months after the completion of the intervention. Taken together, the results suggest that math self-concepts are malleable and that social–cognitive interventions can boost children’s beliefs about themselves and math. Based on the favorable results of this feasibility study, it is appropriate to formally test this novel multicomponent approach for improving math self-concepts using randomized controlled trial (RCT) design.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1661285 1640889
PAR ID:
10203792
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Frontiers in Psychology
Volume:
11
ISSN:
1664-1078
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Early Education and Development)
    Research Findings: Two hundred and sixty-seven Chilean children from grades 1–3, their fathers and their mothers completed measures of implicit and explicit math-related beliefs (math–gender stereotypes, math selfconcepts) and feelings (math anxiety), as well as tests of mathematical achievement. Children, fathers, and mothers exhibited stereotypes that link math with males. More specifically, mothers identified more with language than with math, while fathers and children identified more with math than with language. Path analyses models revealed that children’s explicit math self-concepts significantly predicted their actual math achievement. Children’s explicit self-concept was, in turn, explained marginally by the mathematical anxiety of their mothers. Practice or Policy: These results contribute to our understanding of the relation between parental and children’s beliefs and children’s math achievement during early elementary school years. In countries such as Chile, with a significant gender gap in math achievement, these findings may highlight relevant aspects to consider when designing interventions aimed at educational equity and providing equal mathematical learning opportunities to boys and girls. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Child Development)
    Three hundred and ninety‐one children (195 girls;Mage = 9.56 years) attending Grades 1 and 5 completed implicit and explicit measures of math attitudes and math self‐concepts. Math grades were obtained. Multilevel analyses showed that first‐grade girls held a strong negative implicit attitude about math, despite no gender differences in math grades or self‐reported (explicit) positivity about math. The explicit measures significantly predicted math grades, and implicit attitudes accounted for additional variance in boys. The contrast between the implicit (negativity for girls) and explicit (positivity for girls and boys) effects suggest implicit–explicit dissociations in children, which have also been observed in adults. Early‐emerging implicit attitudes may be a foundation for the later development of explicit attitudes and beliefs about math. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Physical Review Physics Education Research)
    Accuracy on assessments is commonly studied in education research but response time (RT) is relatively less investigated even though decades of research in cognitive sciences indicate that time can be an important dimension for understanding student learning. To better understand RT and the potentially important relations between accuracy and RT in physics education, we conducted an exploratory investigation by collecting and analyzing both accuracy and RT data on physics-relevant math skills on low-stakes pre and posttests as well as course exam scores in algebra-based and calculus-based introductory physics courses over two semesters for a total of N = 1 9 3 6 participants. Overall, we found a high level of variation in response times revealing weak but consistent patterns of associations between RT and accuracy on skills and exam scores. First, we found a nonlinear relationship between RT and accuracy on the pretest and on the post-test, which may indicate a variety of strategies and engagement among students on these participation-credit-only tests. Second, the results indicate that while RT alone does not predict course grade, when controlling for accuracy on pre or posttest math skills, students with lower RT on these skills are more likely to get better grades. Therefore, both pre or posttest accuracy and speed predicted course grades, though accuracy explained a substantial amount of variance ( ∼ 35 % ) while pretest RT explained a much smaller amount of variance ( ∼ 1 % ). Third, controlling for both pretest accuracy and pretest RT, we found that students who sped up from pre to posttest were likely to get higher exam scores; however, students who slowed down were on average likely to have a higher post-test score. Fourth, since systemic inequities in STEM education have been documented via measured mean differences between some demographic groups for exam scores and accuracy on math skills, we compared RTs by sex, race, first-generation status, and citizenship to potentially gain more insight into these inequities. We found no consistent or conclusive evidence of demographic differences, though in multiple comparisons, Black, Hispanic, Native American, and Pacific Islander students had larger RTs on average, and in one comparison they were slightly faster. We found that RT was not a mediator of demographic differences in physics grades, though, as expected, accuracy on math skills was a mediator. We briefly discuss how our results relate to various cognitive models such as cognitive ability, speed-accuracy trade-offs, fluency and cognitive load, dual-process theories, and student psychological factors like self-efficacy, anxiety, and motivation. We argue that, based on which (if any) of the above mechanisms are at play, valuing speed in physics may have benefits, such as improving fluency to reduce cognitive load and drawbacks, such as unintentionally using speed as a proxy for achievement or inducing excessive stress that may interfere with performance and student well-being. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Developmental Psychology)
    Spatial skills in early childhood are key predictors of mathematical achievement. Previous studies have found that training mental rotation can transfer to arithmetic skills; however, some studies have failed to replicate this transfer effect, or observed transfer effects only in certain types of arithmetic problems. Even in studies where transfer effects were observed, the underlying mechanisms of this transfer have not been explored. This study focused on the effect of short-duration (i.e., single-session) spatial training on arithmetic skills, and tested two underlying mechanisms. First, based on the spatial modeling account, short-duration spatial training may prime spatial processing, leading to a reduction in the use of counting strategies and an increase in spatially-related strategies following spatial training. Second, from a social-psychological account, short-duration spatial training may reduce children’s state anxiety, thus allowing them more cognitive resources in spatial and arithmetic tasks. We tested these mechanisms among 80 U.S. second- and third-graders using a pretest-intervention-posttest design, with 40 children in the spatial training group and 40 in an active control group. Short-duration spatial training improved children’s overall arithmetic performance; this effect did not differ by problem type (conventional, missing-term, or two-step problems). Spatial training also reduced children’s use of counting strategies. However, we did not find a significant increase in spatially-related strategies, nor did we observe a significant reduction in state anxiety. This study makes an important contribution to understanding the mechanisms underlying the transfer effects of short-duration spatial training on arithmetic skills, providing partial support for the spatial modeling account. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education)
    Prior studies have explored the potential of erroneous examples in helping students learn more effectively by correcting errors in solutions to decimal problems. One recent study found that while students experience more confusion and frustration (confrustion) when working with erroneous examples, they demonstrate better retention of decimal concepts. In this study, we investigated whether this finding could be replicated in a digital learning game. In the erroneous examples (ErrEx) version of the game, students saw a character play the games and make mistakes, and then they corrected the characters’ errors. In the problem solving (PS) version, students played the games by themselves. We found that confrustion was significantly, negatively correlated with performance in both pretest (r = -.62, p < .001) and posttest (r = -.68, p < .001) and so was gaming the system (pretest r = -.58, p < .001, posttest r = -.66, p < .001). Posthoc (Tukey) tests indicated that students who did not see any erroneous examples (PS-only) experienced significantly lower levels of confrustion (p < .001) and gaming (p < .001). While we did not find significant differences in post-test performance across conditions, our findings show that students working with erroneous examples experience consistently higher levels of confrustion in both game and non-game contexts. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email