More Like this

1. Boba: Authoring and Visualizing Multiverse Analyses

   https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3028985  

   Liu, Yang; Kale, Alex; Althoff, Tim; Heer, Jeffrey (February 2021, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics)

   null (Ed.)
2. Structure-Aware Analyses and Algorithms for Interpolative Decompositions

   https://doi.org/10.1137/23M1610811  

   Armstrong, Robin; Buzali, Alex; Damle, Anil (June 2025, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing)
3. Differentiating Digital Printing Through Physical and Chemical Analyses

   Sousa Ribeiro, Ana C.; Kellar, Jon J.; Crawford, Grant A.; Simske, Steven J.; Petersen, Jacob B. (October 2020, NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference, Printing for Fabrication Online 2020 Final Program and Proceedings)

   null (Ed.)

   Over the past decade, the trade of counterfeit goods has increased. This has been enabled by advancements in low-cost digital printing methods (e.g., inkjet and laserjet) that are an asset for counterfeit production methods. However, each printing method produces characteristic printed features that can be used to identify not only the printing method, but also, uniquely identify the specific make and model of printer. This knowledge can be used for determination of whether or not the analyzed item is counterfeit. During the first phase of this research, chemical and physical analyses were performed on printed documents and ink samples for two types of digital printing: inkjet and laserjet. The results showed that it is possible to identify the digital method used to print a document by its unique features. Physical analysis revealed that the laserjet prints have a higher image quality characterized by sharper feature edge quality, brighter image area, and a thicker ink layer (10 micron average thickness) than in inkjet documents. Chemical analysis showed that the inkjet and laserjet inks could easily be distinguished by identifying the various ink components. Ink jet inks included (among others) water, ethylene glycol while laserjet inks presented styrene, methacrylate, and sulfide compounds. 

   more » « less
4. Genomics and conservation: Guidance from training to analyses and applications

   https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13893  

   Schiebelhut, Lauren M.; Guillaume, Annie S.; Kuhn, Arianna; Schweizer, Rena M.; Armstrong, Ellie E.; Beaumont, Mark A.; Byrne, Margaret; Cosart, Ted; Hand, Brian K.; Howard, Leif; et al (February 2024, Molecular Ecology Resources)

   Abstract Environmental change is intensifying the biodiversity crisis and threatening species across the tree of life. Conservation genomics can help inform conservation actions and slow biodiversity loss. However, more training, appropriate use of novel genomic methods and communication with managers are needed. Here, we review practical guidance to improve applied conservation genomics. We share insights aimed at ensuring effectiveness of conservation actions around three themes: (1) improving pedagogy and training in conservation genomics including for online global audiences, (2) conducting rigorous population genomic analyses properly considering theory, marker types and data interpretation and (3) facilitating communication and collaboration between managers and researchers. We aim to update students and professionals and expand their conservation toolkit with genomic principles and recent approaches for conserving and managing biodiversity. The biodiversity crisis is a global problem and, as such, requires international involvement, training, collaboration and frequent reviews of the literature and workshops as we do here. 

   more » « less
5. Community-developed checklists for publishing images and image analyses

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-023-01987-9  

   Schmied, Christopher; Nelson, Michael S.; Avilov, Sergiy; Bakker, Gert-Jan; Bertocchi, Cristina; Bischof, Johanna; Boehm, Ulrike; Brocher, Jan; Carvalho, Mariana T.; Chiritescu, Catalin; et al (September 2023, Nature Methods)

   Images document scientific discoveries and are prevalent in modern biomedical research. Microscopy imaging in particular is currently undergoing rapid technological advancements. However, for scientists wishing to publish obtained images and image-analysis results, there are currently no unified guidelines for best practices. Consequently, microscopy images and image data in publications may be unclear or difficult to interpret. Here, we present community-developed checklists for preparing light microscopy images and describing image analyses for publications. These checklists offer authors, readers and publishers key recommendations for image formatting and annotation, color selection, data availability and reporting image-analysis workflows. The goal of our guidelines is to increase the clarity and reproducibility of image figures and thereby to heighten the quality and explanatory power of microscopy data. 

   more » « less