A scaling law for the shear-production range of second-order structure functions
Dimensional analysis suggests that the dissipation length scale ( $\ell _{{\it\epsilon}}=u_{\star }^{3}/{\it\epsilon}$ ) is the appropriate scale for the shear-production range of the second-order streamwise structure function in neutrally stratified turbulent shear flows near solid boundaries, including smooth- and rough-wall boundary layers and shear layers above canopies (e.g. crops, forests and cities). These flows have two major characteristics in common: (i) a single velocity scale, i.e. the friction velocity ( $u_{\star }$ ) and (ii) the presence of large eddies that scale with an external length scale much larger than the local integral length scale. No assumptions are made about the local integral scale, which is shown to be proportional to $\ell _{{\it\epsilon}}$ for the scaling analysis to be consistent with Kolmogorov’s result for the inertial subrange. Here ${\it\epsilon}$ is the rate of dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) that represents the rate of energy cascade in the inertial subrange. The scaling yields a log-law dependence of the second-order streamwise structure function on ( $r/\ell _{{\it\epsilon}}$ ), where $r$ is the streamwise spatial separation. This scaling law is confirmed by large-eddy simulation (LES) results in the roughness sublayer above a model canopy, where the imbalance between local production and dissipation of TKE more »
Authors:
;
Award ID(s):
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10218845
Journal Name:
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Volume:
801
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
459 to 474
ISSN:
0022-1120
5. Abstract Direct numerical simulations are performed to compare the evolution of turbulent stratified shear layers with different density gradient profiles at a high Reynolds number. The density profiles include uniform stratification, two-layer hyperbolic tangent profile and a composite of these two profiles. All profiles have the same initial bulk Richardson number ( $$Ri_{b,0}$$ R i b , 0 ); however, the minimum gradient Richardson number and the distribution of density gradient across the shear layer are varied among the cases. The objective of the study is to provide a comparative analysis of the evolution of the shear layers in term of shear layer growth, turbulent kinetic energy as well as the mixing efficiency and its parameterization. The evolution of the shear layers in all cases shows the development of Kelvin–Helmholtz billows, the transition to turbulence by secondary instabilities followed by the decay of turbulence. Comparison among the cases reveals that the amount of turbulent mixing varies with the density gradient distribution inside the shear layer. The minimum gradient Richardson number and the initial bulk Richardson number do not correlate well with the integrated TKE production, dissipation and buoyancy flux. The bulk mixing efficiency for fixed $$Ri_{b,0}$$ R i b ,more »