skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Noncovalent Bonds through Sigma and Pi-Hole Located on the Same Molecule. Guiding Principles and Comparisons
Over the last years, scientific interest in noncovalent interactions based on the presence of electron-depleted regions called σ-holes or π-holes has markedly accelerated. Their high directionality and strength, comparable to hydrogen bonds, has been documented in many fields of modern chemistry. The current review gathers and digests recent results concerning these bonds, with a focus on those systems where both σ and π-holes are present on the same molecule. The underlying principles guiding the bonding in both sorts of interactions are discussed, and the trends that emerge from recent work offer a guide as to how one might design systems that allow multiple noncovalent bonds to occur simultaneously, or that prefer one bond type over another.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1954310
PAR ID:
10226290
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Molecules
Volume:
26
Issue:
6
ISSN:
1420-3049
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1740
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The Osme bond is defined as pairing a Group 8 metal atom as an electron acceptor in a noncovalent interaction with a nucleophile. DFT calculations with the ωB97XD functional consider MO4 (M = Ru, Os) as the Lewis acid, paired with a series of π electron donors C2H2, C2H4, C6H6, C4H5N, C4H4O, and C4H4S. The calculations establish interaction energies in the range between 9.5 and 26.4 kJ/mol. Os engages in stronger interactions than does Ru, and those involving more extensive π-systems within the aromatic rings form stronger bonds than do the smaller ethylene and acetylene. Extensive analysis questions the existence of a true Osme bond, as the bonding chiefly involves interactions with the three O atoms of MO4 that lie closest to the π-system, via π(C-C)→σ*(M-O) transfers. These interactions are supplemented by back donation from M-O bonds to the π*(CC) antibonding orbitals of the π-systems. Dispersion makes a large contribution to these interactions, higher than electrostatics and much greater than induction. 
    more » « less
  2. All metals of the d-block are capable of forming σ and π-hole bonds to a nucleophile. Some of these bonds are typical of noncovalent bonds, but others are strong enough to be characterized as a covalent coordinate bond. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The structures and associated functions of biological molecules are driven by noncovalent interactions, which have classically been dominated by the hydrogen bond (H‐bond). Introduction of the σ‐hole concept to describe the anisotropic distribution of electrostatic potential of covalently bonded elements from across the periodic table has opened a broad range of nonclassical noncovalent ( nc NC) interactions for applications in chemistry and biochemistry. Here, we review how halogen bonds, chalcogen bonds and tetrel bonds, as they are found naturally or introduced synthetically, affect the structures, assemblies, and potential functions of peptides and proteins. This review intentionally focuses on examples that introduce or support principles of stability, assembly and catalysis that can potentially guide the design of new functional proteins. These three types of nc NC interactions have energies that are comparable to the H‐bond and, therefore, are now significant concepts in molecular recognition and design. However, the recently described H‐bond enhanced X‐bond shows how synergism among nc NC interactions can be exploited as potential means to broaden the range of their applications to affect protein structures and functions. 
    more » « less
  4. Thermal expansion (TE) behavior in solid-state materials is influenced by both molecular and supramolecular structure. For solid-state materials assembled through covalent bonds, such as carbon allotropes, solids with higher dimensionality (i.e., diamond) exhibit less TE than solids with lower dimensionality (e.g., fullerene, graphite). Thus, as the dimensionality of the solid increases, the TE decreases. However, an analogous and systematic variation of the dimensionality in solid-state materials assembled through noncovalent bonds with a correlation to TE has not been studied. Here, we designed a series of solids based on dimensional hierarchy to afford materials with zero-dimensional (0D), 1D, and 2D hydrogen-bonded structures. The 2D materials are structural analogues of graphite and covalent-organic frameworks, and we demonstrate that these 2D solids exhibit unique biaxial zero TE with anisotropic and colossal TE along the π-stacked direction (α ∼ 200 MK–1). The overall behavior in the 2D hydrogen-bonded solids is similar to 2D covalent-bonded solids; however, the coefficient of TE along the π-stacked direction for these hydrogen-bonded solids is an order of magnitude higher than in 2D graphite or phosphorus allotropes. The hierarchal materials design strategy and correlation to TE properties described herein can be broadly applied to the design and synthesis of new solid-state materials sustained by covalent or noncovalent bonds with control over solid-state behaviors. 
    more » « less
  5. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins by kinases and phosphatases are central to cellular responses and function. The structural effects of serine and threonine phosphorylation were examined in peptides and in proteins, by circular dichroism, NMR spectroscopy, bioinformatics analysis of the PDB, small-molecule X-ray crystallography, and computational investigations. Phosphorylation of both serine and threonine residues induces substantial conformational restriction in their physiologically more important dianionic forms. Threonine exhibits a particularly strong disorder-to-order transition upon phosphorylation, with dianionic phosphothreonine preferentially adopting a cyclic conformation with restricted φ (φ ~ –60 ̊) stabilized by three noncovalent interactions: a strong intraresidue phosphate-amide hydrogen bond, an n→π* interaction between consecutive carbonyls, and an n→σ* interaction between the phosphate Oγ lone pair and the antibonding orbital of C–Hβ that restricts the χ2 side chain conformation. Proline is unique among the canonical amino acids for its covalent cyclization on the backbone. Phosphothreonine can mimic proline's backbone cyclization via noncovalent interactions. The preferred torsions of dianionic phosphothreonine are φ,ψ = polyproline II helix > α-helix (φ ~ –60 ̊); χ1 = g–; χ2 ~ +115 ̊ (eclipsed C–H/O–P bonds). This structural signature is observed in diverse proteins, including in the activation loops of protein kinases and in protein-protein interactions. In total, these results suggest a structural basis for the differential use and evolution of threonine versus serine phosphorylation sites in proteins, with serine phosphorylation typically inducing smaller, rheostat-like changes, versus threonine phosphorylation promoting larger, step function-like switches, in proteins. 
    more » « less