More Like this

1. The Carnegie Supernova Project II: Early observations and progenitor constraints of the Type Ib supernova LSQ13abf

   https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936619  

   Stritzinger, M. D. ; Taddia, F. ; Holmbo, S. ; Baron, E. ; Contreras, C. ; Karamehmetoglu, E. ; Phillips, M. M. ; Sollerman, J. ; Suntzeff, N. B. ; Vinko, J. ; et al ( February 2020 , Astronomy & Astrophysics)

   Supernova LSQ13abf was discovered soon after explosion by the La Silla-QUEST Survey and then followed by the Carnegie Supernova Project II at its optical and near-IR wavelengths. Our analysis indicates that LSQ13abf was discovered within two days of explosion and its first ≈10 days of evolution reveal a B -band light curve with an abrupt drop in luminosity. Contemporaneously, the V -band light curve exhibits a rise towards a first peak and the r - and i -band light curves show no early peak. The early light-curve evolution of LSQ13abf is reminiscent of the post-explosion cooling phase observed in the Type Ib SN 2008D, and the similarity between the two objects extends over weeks. Spectroscopically, LSQ13abf also resembles SN 2008D, with P Cygni He  I features that strengthen over several weeks. Spectral energy distributions are constructed from the broad-bandphotometry, a UVOIR light curve is constructed by fitting black-body (BB) functions, and the underlying BB-temperature and BB-radius profiles are estimated. Explosion parameters are estimated by simultaneously fitting an Arnett model to the UVOIR light curve and the velocity evolution derived from spectral features, and an in addition to a post-shock breakout cooling model to the first two epochs of the bolometric evolution. This combined model suggests an explosion energy of 1.27 ± 0.23 × 10 51 ergs, in addition to a relatively high ejecta mass of 5.94 ± 1.10 M ⊙ , a 56 Ni mass of 0.16 ± 0.02 M ⊙ , and a progenitor-star radius of 28.0 ± 7.5 R ⊙ . The ejecta mass suggests the origins of LSQ13abf lie with a > 25  M ⊙ zero-age-main-sequence mass progenitor and its estimated radius is three times larger compared to the result obtained from the same analysis applied to observations of SN 2008D, and nine times larger compared to SN 1999ex. Alternatively, a comparison of hydrodynamical simulations of ≳20−25 M ⊙ zero-age-main-sequence progenitors that evolve to pre-supernova envelope masses of ≲10 M ⊙ and extended (∼100 R ⊙ ) envelopes also broadly match the observations of LSQ13abf. 

   more » « less
2. Supernova 2018cuf: A Type IIP Supernova with a Slow Fall from Plateau

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc417  

   Dong, Yize ; Valenti, S. ; Bostroem, K. A. ; Sand, D. J. ; Andrews, Jennifer E. ; Galbany, L. ; Jha, Saurabh W. ; Eweis, Youssef ; Kwok, Lindsey ; Hsiao, E. Y. ; et al ( January 2021 , The Astrophysical Journal)

   null (Ed.)
3. First cosmology results using Type Ia supernova from the Dark Energy Survey: simulations to correct supernova distance biases

   https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz463  

   Kessler, R ; Brout, D ; D’Andrea, C B ; Davis, T M ; Hinton, S R ; Kim, A G ; Lasker, J ; Lidman, C ; Macaulay, E ; Möller, A ; et al ( February 2019 , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)
4. Supernova 2020wnt: An Atypical Superluminous Supernova with a Hidden Central Engine

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc6c3  

   Tinyanont, Samaporn ; Woosley, Stan E. ; Taggart, Kirsty ; Foley, Ryan J. ; Yan, Lin ; Lunnan, Ragnhild ; Davis, Kyle W. ; Kilpatrick, Charles D. ; Siebert, Matthew R. ; Schulze, Steve ; et al ( June 2023 , The Astrophysical Journal)

   We present observations of a peculiar hydrogen- and helium-poor stripped-envelope (SE) supernova (SN) 2020wnt, primarily in the optical and near-infrared (near-IR). Its peak absolute bolometric magnitude of −20.9 mag (L_{bol, peak}= (6.8 ± 0.3) × 10⁴³erg s⁻¹) and a rise time of 69 days are reminiscent of hydrogen-poor superluminous SNe (SLSNe I), luminous transients potentially powered by spinning-down magnetars. Before the main peak, there is a brief peak lasting <10 days post explosion, likely caused by interaction with circumstellar medium (CSM) ejected ∼years before the SN explosion. The optical spectra near peak lack a hot continuum and Oiiabsorptions, which are signs of heating from a central engine; they quantitatively resemble those of radioactivity-powered hydrogen/helium-poor Type Ic SESNe. At ∼1 yr after peak, nebular spectra reveal a blue pseudo-continuum and narrow Oirecombination lines associated with magnetar heating. Radio observations rule out strong CSM interactions as the dominant energy source at +266 days post peak. Near-IR observations at +200–300 days reveal carbon monoxide and dust formation, which causes a dramatic optical light-curve dip. Pair-instability explosion models predict slow light curve and spectral features incompatible with observations. SN 2020wnt is best explained as a magnetar-powered core-collapse explosion of a 28M_⊙pre-SN star. The explosion kinetic energy is significantly larger than the magnetar energy at peak, effectively concealing the magnetar-heated inner ejecta until well after peak. SN 2020wnt falls into a continuum between normal SNe Ic and SLSNe I, and demonstrates that optical spectra at peak alone cannot rule out the presence of a central engine.

    

   more » « less
5. The Type Ibn Supernova 2019kbj: Indications for Diversity in Type Ibn Supernova Progenitors

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb432  

   Ben-Ami, Tom ; Arcavi, Iair ; Newsome, Megan ; Farah, Joseph ; Pellegrino, Craig ; Terreran, Giacomo ; Burke, Jamison ; Hosseinzadeh, Griffin ; McCully, Curtis ; Hiramatsu, Daichi ; et al ( March 2023 , The Astrophysical Journal)

   Type Ibn supernovae (SNe) are a rare class of stellar explosions whose progenitor systems are not yet well determined. We present and analyze observations of the Type Ibn SN 2019kbj, and model its light curve in order to constrain its progenitor and explosion parameters. SN 2019kbj shows roughly constant temperature during the first month after peak, indicating a power source (likely circumstellar material interaction) that keeps the continuum emission hot at ∼15,000 K. Indeed, we find that the radioactive decay of⁵⁶Ni is disfavored as the sole power source of the bolometric light curve. A radioactive decay + circumstellar material (CSM) interaction model, on the other hand, does reproduce the bolometric emission well. The fits prefer a uniform-density CSM shell rather than CSM due to a steady mass-loss wind, similar to what is seen in other Type Ibn SNe. The uniform-density CSM shell model requires ∼0.1M_⊙of⁵⁶Ni and ∼1M_⊙total ejecta mass to reproduce the light curve. SN 2019kbj differs in this manner from another Type Ibn SN with derived physical parameters, SN 2019uo, for which an order of magnitude lower⁵⁶Ni mass and larger ejecta mass were derived. This points toward a possible diversity in SN Ibn progenitor systems and explosions.

    

   more » « less