An official website of the United States government
Abstract Four new isoorotamide (Io)‐containing PNA nucleobases have been designed for A−U recognition of double helical RNA. New PNA monomers were prepared efficiently and incorporated into PNA nonamers for binding A−U in a PNA:RNA2triplex. Isothermal titration calorimetry and UV thermal melting experiments revealed slightly improved binding affinity for singly modified PNA compared to known A‐binding nucleobases. Molecular dynamics simulations provided further insights into binding ofIobases in the triple helix. Together, the data revealed interesting insights into binding modes including the notion that three Hoogsteen hydrogen bonds are unnecessary for strong selective binding of an extended nucleobase. Cationic monomerIo8additionally gave the highest affinity observed for an A‐binding nucleobase to date. These results will help inform future nucleobase design toward the goal of recognizing any sequence of double helical RNA.
more »
« less
Extended Peptide Nucleic Acid Nucleobases Based on Isoorotic Acid for the Recognition of A–U Base Pairs in Double‐Stranded RNA
Abstract Peptide nucleic acids (PNA) with extended isoorotamide containing nucleobases (Io) were designed for binding A–U base pairs in double‐stranded RNA. Isothermal titration calorimetry and UV thermal melting experiments revealed improved affinity for A–U using theIoscaffold in PNA. PNAs having four sequentialIoextended nucleobases maintained high binding affinity.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10255870
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Chemistry – A European Journal
- Volume:
- 27
- Issue:
- 13
- ISSN:
- 0947-6539
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 4332-4335
- Size(s):
- p. 4332-4335
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Triple‐helical recognition of any sequence of double‐stranded RNA requires high affinity Hoogsteen hydrogen binding to pyrimidine interruptions of polypurine tracts. Because pyrimidines have only one hydrogen bond donor/acceptor on Hoogsteen face, their triple‐helical recognition is a formidable problem. The present study explored various five‐membered heterocycles and linkers that connect nucleobases to backbone of peptide nucleic acid (PNA) to optimize formation of X•C‐G and Y•U‐A triplets. Molecular modeling and biophysical (UV melting and isothermal titration calorimetry) results revealed a complex interplay between the heterocyclic nucleobase and linker to PNA backbone. While the five‐membered heterocycles did not improve pyrimidine recognition, increasing the linker length by four atoms provided promising gains in binding affinity and selectivity. The results suggest that further optimization of heterocyclic bases with extended linkers to PNA backbone may be a promising approach to triple‐helical recognition of RNA.more » « less
-
Abstract Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) forms a triple helix with double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) stabilized by a hydrogen‐bonding zipper formed by PNA's backbone amides (N−H) interacting with RNA phosphate oxygens. This hydrogen‐bonding pattern is enabled by the matching ∼5.7 Å spacing (typical for A‐form dsRNA) between PNA's backbone amides and RNA phosphate oxygens. We hypothesized that extending the PNA's backbone by one −CH2− group might bring the distance between PNA amide groups closer to 7 Å, which is favourable for hydrogen bonding to the B‐form dsDNA phosphate oxygens. Extension of the PNA backbone was expected to selectively stabilize PNA‐DNA triplexes compared to PNA‐RNA. To test this hypothesis, we synthesized triplex‐forming PNAs that had the pseudopeptide backbones extended by an additional −CH2− group in three different positions. Isothermal titration calorimetry measurements of the binding affinity of these extended PNA analogues for the matched dsDNA and dsRNA showed that, contrary to our structural reasoning, extending the PNA backbone at any position had a strong negative effect on triplex stability. Our results suggest that PNAs might have an inherent preference for A‐form‐like conformations when binding double‐stranded nucleic acids. It appears that the original six‐atom‐long PNA backbone is an almost perfect fit for binding to A‐form nucleic acids.more » « less
-
Abstract Affinities of six anions (mesylate, acetate, trifluoroacetate,p‐toluenecarboxylate,p‐toluenesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate) for three related Pt2+‐linked porphyrin nanocages were measured to probe the influence of different noncovalent recognition motifs (e. g., hydrogen bonding, electrostatics, π bonding) on anion binding. Two new hosts of M6L312+(1b) and M4L28+(2) composition (M=(en)Pt2+, L=(3‐py)4porphyrin) were prepared in a one‐pot synthesis and allowed comparison of hosts that differ in structure while maintaining similar N−H hydrogen‐bond donor ability. Comparisons of isostructural hosts that differ in hydrogen‐bonding ability were made between1band a related M6L312+nanoprism (1a, M=(tmeda)Pt2+) that lacks N−H groups. Considerable variation in association constants (K1=1.6×103 M−1to 1.3×108 M−1) and binding mode (exovs.endo) were found for different host–guest combinations. Strongest binding was seen betweenp‐toluenecarboxylate and1b, but surprisingly, association of this guest with1awas only slightly weaker despite the absence of NH⋅⋅⋅O interactions. The high affinity betweenp‐toluenecarboxylate and1acould be turned off by protonation, and this behavior was used to toggle between the binding of this guest and the environmental pollutant perfluorooctanoate, which otherwise has a lower affinity for the host.more » « less
-
Abstract Reaction of (P)AuOTf [P=P(t‐Bu)2o‐biphenyl] with indenyl‐ or 3‐methylindenyl lithium led to isolation of gold η1‐indenyl complexes (P)Au(η1‐inden‐1‐yl) (1 a) and (P)Au(η1‐3‐methylinden‐1‐yl) (1 b), respectively, in >65 % yield. Whereas complex1 bis static, complex1 aundergoes facile, degenerate 1,3‐migration of gold about the indenyl ligand (ΔG≠153K=9.1±1.1 kcal/mol). Treatment of complexes1 aand1 bwith (P)AuNTf2led to formation of the corresponding cationic bis(gold) indenyl complexestrans‐[(P)Au]2(η1,η1‐inden‐1,3‐yl) (2 a) andtrans‐[(P)Au]2(η1,η2‐3‐methylinden‐1‐yl) (2 b), respectively, which were characterized spectroscopically and modeled computationally. Despite the absence of aurophilic stabilization in complexes2 aand2 b, the binding affinity of mono(gold) complex1 atoward exogenous (P)Au+exceed that of free indene by ~350‐fold and similarly the binding affinity of1 btoward exogenous (P)Au+exceed that of 3‐methylindene by ~50‐fold. The energy barrier for protodeauration of bis(gold) indenyl complex2 awith HOAc was ≥8 kcal/mol higher than for protodeauration of mono(gold) complex1 a.more » « less
