skip to main content


Title: Exploring the practical efficiency limit of silicon solar cells using thin solar-grade substrates
Multiple silicon solar cell technologies have surpassed or are close to surpassing 26% efficiency. Dielectric and amorphous silicon-based passivation layers combined with minimal metal/silicon contact areas were responsible for reducing the surface saturation current density below 3 fA cm −2 . At open-circuit, in passivated contact solar cells, the recombination is mainly from fundamental mechanisms (Auger and radiative) representing over 3/4 of the total recombination. At the maximum power point, the fundamental recombination fraction can drop to half, as surface and bulk Shockley–Read–Hall step in. As a result, to further increase the performance at the operating point, it is paramount to reduce the bulk dependence and secure proper surface passivation. Bulk recombination can be mitigated either by reducing bulk defect density or by reducing the wafer thickness. We demonstrate that for commercially-viable solar-grade silicon, thinner wafers and surface saturation current densities below 1 fA cm −2 , are required to significantly increase the practical efficiency limit of solar cells up to 0.6% absolute. For a high-quality n-type bulk silicon minority-carrier lifetime of 10 ms, the optimum wafer thickness range is 40–60 μm, a very different value from 110 μm previously calculated assuming undoped substrates and solely Auger and radiative recombination. In this thickness range surface saturation current densities near 0.1 fA cm −2 are required to narrow the gap towards the fundamental efficiency limit. We experimentally demonstrate surface saturation currents below 0.5 fA cm −2 on pi/CZ/in structures across different wafer thicknesses (35–170 μm), with potential to reach open-circuit voltages close to 770 mV and bandgap-voltage offsets near 350 mV. Finally, we use the bandgap-voltage offset as a metric to compare the quality of champion experimental solar cells in the literature, for the most commercially-relevant photovoltaic cell absorbers and architectures.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2016552
NSF-PAR ID:
10281907
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Materials Chemistry A
Volume:
8
Issue:
32
ISSN:
2050-7488
Page Range / eLocation ID:
16599 to 16608
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Air‐stable p‐type SnF2:Cs2SnI6with a bandgap of 1.6 eV has been demonstrated as a promising material for Pb‐free halide perovskite solar cells. Crystalline Cs2SnI6phase is obtained with CsI, SnI2, and SnF2salts in gamma‐butyrolactone solvent, but not with dimethyl sulfoxide andN,N‐dimethylformamide solvents. Cs2SnI6is found to be stable for at least 1000 h at 100 °C when dark annealed in nitrogen atmosphere. In this study, Cs2SnI6has been used in a superstrate n–i–p planar device structure enabled by a spin‐coated absorber thickness of ≈2 μm on a chemical bath deposited Zn(O,S) electron transport layer. The best device power conversion efficiency reported here is 5.18% withVOCof 0.81 V, 9.28 mA cm−2JSC, and 68% fill factor. The dark saturation current and diode ideality factor are estimated as 1.5 × 10−3 mA cm−2and 2.18, respectively. The devices exhibit a highVOCdeficit and low short‐circuit current density due to high bulk and interface recombination. Device efficiency can be expected to increase with improvement in material and interface quality, charge transport, and device engineering.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Surface recombination is a major bottleneck for realizing highly efficient micro/nanostructure solar cells. Here, parametric studies of the influence of Si microwire (SiMW) surface‐facet orientation (rectangular with flat‐facets, {110}, {100} and circular), with a fixed height of 10 µm, diameter (D= 1.5–9.5 µm), and sidewall spacing (S= 2.5–8.5 µm), and mesh‐grid density (1–16 mm−2) on recombination and carrier collection in SiMW solar cells with radial p‐n junctions are reported. An effective surface passivation layer composed of thin thermally grown silicon dioxide (SiO2) and silicon nitride (SiNx) layers is employed. For a fixedDof 1.5 µm, tight SiMW spacing results in improved short‐circuit current density (Jsc= 30.1 mA cm−2) and sparse arrays result in open‐circuit voltages (Voc= 0.552 V) that are similar to those of control Si planar cells. For a fixedS, smallerDresults in better light trapping at shorter wavelengths and higherJscwhile largerDexhibits better light trapping at larger wavelengths and a higherVoc. With a mesh‐grid electrode the power conversion efficiency increases to 15.3%. These results provide insights on the recombination mechanisms in SiMW solar cells and provide general design principles for optimizing their performance.

     
    more » « less
  3. Resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) have come full-circle in the past 10 years after their demonstration in the early 1990s as the fastest room-temperature semiconductor oscillator, displaying experimental results up to 712 GHz and fmax values exceeding 1.0 THz [1]. Now the RTD is once again the preeminent electronic oscillator above 1.0 THz and is being implemented as a coherent source [2] and a self-oscillating mixer [3], amongst other applications. This paper concerns RTD electroluminescence – an effect that has been studied very little in the past 30+ years of RTD development, and not at room temperature. We present experiments and modeling of an n-type In0.53Ga0.47As/AlAs double-barrier RTD operating as a cross-gap light emitter at ~300K. The MBE-growth stack is shown in Fig. 1(a). A 15-μm-diam-mesa device was defined by standard planar processing including a top annular ohmic contact with a 5-μm-diam pinhole in the center to couple out enough of the internal emission for accurate free-space power measurements [4]. The emission spectra have the behavior displayed in Fig. 1(b), parameterized by bias voltage (VB). The long wavelength emission edge is at  = 1684 nm - close to the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap energy of Ug ≈ 0.75 eV at 300 K. The spectral peaks for VB = 2.8 and 3.0 V both occur around  = 1550 nm (h = 0.75 eV), so blue-shifted relative to the peak of the “ideal”, bulk InGaAs emission spectrum shown in Fig. 1(b) [5]. These results are consistent with the model displayed in Fig. 1(c), whereby the broad emission peak is attributed to the radiative recombination between electrons accumulated on the emitter side, and holes generated on the emitter side by interband tunneling with current density Jinter. The blue-shifted main peak is attributed to the quantum-size effect on the emitter side, which creates a radiative recombination rate RN,2 comparable to the band-edge cross-gap rate RN,1. Further support for this model is provided by the shorter wavelength and weaker emission peak shown in Fig. 1(b) around = 1148 nm. Our quantum mechanical calculations attribute this to radiative recombination RR,3 in the RTD quantum well between the electron ground-state level E1,e, and the hole level E1,h. To further test the model and estimate quantum efficiencies, we conducted optical power measurements using a large-area Ge photodiode located ≈3 mm away from the RTD pinhole, and having spectral response between 800 and 1800 nm with a peak responsivity of ≈0.85 A/W at  =1550 nm. Simultaneous I-V and L-V plots were obtained and are plotted in Fig. 2(a) with positive bias on the top contact (emitter on the bottom). The I-V curve displays a pronounced NDR region having a current peak-to-valley current ratio of 10.7 (typical for In0.53Ga0.47As RTDs). The external quantum efficiency (EQE) was calculated from EQE = e∙IP/(∙IE∙h) where IP is the photodiode dc current and IE the RTD current. The plot of EQE is shown in Fig. 2(b) where we see a very rapid rise with VB, but a maximum value (at VB= 3.0 V) of only ≈2×10-5. To extract the internal quantum efficiency (IQE), we use the expression EQE= c ∙i ∙r ≡ c∙IQE where ci, and r are the optical-coupling, electrical-injection, and radiative recombination efficiencies, respectively [6]. Our separate optical calculations yield c≈3.4×10-4 (limited primarily by the small pinhole) from which we obtain the curve of IQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) (right-hand scale). The maximum value of IQE (again at VB = 3.0 V) is 6.0%. From the implicit definition of IQE in terms of i and r given above, and the fact that the recombination efficiency in In0.53Ga0.47As is likely limited by Auger scattering, this result for IQE suggests that i might be significantly high. To estimate i, we have used the experimental total current of Fig. 2(a), the Kane two-band model of interband tunneling [7] computed in conjunction with a solution to Poisson’s equation across the entire structure, and a rate-equation model of Auger recombination on the emitter side [6] assuming a free-electron density of 2×1018 cm3. We focus on the high-bias regime above VB = 2.5 V of Fig. 2(a) where most of the interband tunneling should occur in the depletion region on the collector side [Jinter,2 in Fig. 1(c)]. And because of the high-quality of the InGaAs/AlAs heterostructure (very few traps or deep levels), most of the holes should reach the emitter side by some combination of drift, diffusion, and tunneling through the valence-band double barriers (Type-I offset) between InGaAs and AlAs. The computed interband current density Jinter is shown in Fig. 3(a) along with the total current density Jtot. At the maximum Jinter (at VB=3.0 V) of 7.4×102 A/cm2, we get i = Jinter/Jtot = 0.18, which is surprisingly high considering there is no p-type doping in the device. When combined with the Auger-limited r of 0.41 and c ≈ 3.4×10-4, we find a model value of IQE = 7.4% in good agreement with experiment. This leads to the model values for EQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) - also in good agreement with experiment. Finally, we address the high Jinter and consider a possible universal nature of the light-emission mechanism. Fig. 3(b) shows the tunneling probability T according to the Kane two-band model in the three materials, In0.53Ga0.47As, GaAs, and GaN, following our observation of a similar electroluminescence mechanism in GaN/AlN RTDs (due to strong polarization field of wurtzite structures) [8]. The expression is Tinter = (2/9)∙exp[(-2 ∙Ug 2 ∙me)/(2h∙P∙E)], where Ug is the bandgap energy, P is the valence-to-conduction-band momentum matrix element, and E is the electric field. Values for the highest calculated internal E fields for the InGaAs and GaN are also shown, indicating that Tinter in those structures approaches values of ~10-5. As shown, a GaAs RTD would require an internal field of ~6×105 V/cm, which is rarely realized in standard GaAs RTDs, perhaps explaining why there have been few if any reports of room-temperature electroluminescence in the GaAs devices. [1] E.R. Brown,et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 58, 2291, 1991. [5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981). [2] M. Feiginov et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, 233506, 2011. [6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995). [3] Y. Nishida et al., Nature Sci. Reports, 9, 18125, 2019. [7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961). [4] P. Fakhimi, et al., 2019 DRC Conference Digest. [8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018). [5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981). [6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995). [7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961). [8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018). 
    more » « less
  4.  
    more » « less
  5.  
    more » « less