More Like this

1. Competition between Nucleic Acids and Intrinsically Disordered Regions within Proteins

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5c00261  

   Wang, Xi; Levy, Yaakov; Iwahara, Junji (July 2025, Accounts of Chemical Research)

   Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are important components of protein functionality, with their charge distribution serving as a key factor in determining their roles. Notably, many proteins possess IDRs that are highly negatively charged, characterized by sequences rich in aspartate (D) or glutamate (E) residues. Bioinformatic analyses indicate that negatively charged low-complexity IDRs are significantly more common than their positively charged counterparts rich in arginine (R) or lysine (K). For instance, sequences of 10 or more consecutive negatively charged residues (D or E) are present in 268 human proteins. In contrast, corresponding sequences of 10 or more consecutive positively charged residues (K or R) are present in only 12 human proteins. Interestingly, about 50% of proteins containing D/E tracts function as DNA-binding or RNA-binding proteins. Negatively charged IDRs can electrostatically mimic nucleic acids and dynamically compete with them for the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) or RNA-binding domains (RBDs) that are positively charged. This leads to a phenomenon known as autoinhibition, in which the negatively charged IDRs inhibit binding to nucleic acids by occupying the binding interfaces within the proteins through intramolecular interactions. Rather than merely reducing binding activity, negatively charged IDRs offer significant advantages for the functions of DNA/RNA-binding proteins. The dynamic competition between negatively charged IDRs and nucleic acids can accelerate the target search processes for these proteins. When a protein encounters DNA or RNA, the electrostatic repulsion force between the nucleic acids and the negatively charged IDRs can trigger conformational changes that allow the nucleic acids to access DBDs or RBDs. Additionally, when proteins are trapped at high-affinity non-target sites on DNA or RNA ("decoys"), the electrostatic repulsion from the negatively charged IDRs can rescue the proteins from these traps. Negatively charged IDRs act as gatekeepers, rejecting nonspecific ligands while allowing the target to access the molecular interfaces of DBDs or RBDs, which increases binding specificity. These IDRs can also promote proper protein folding, facilitate chromatin remodeling by displacing other proteins bound to DNA, and influence phase separation, affecting local pH. The functions of negatively charged IDRs can be regulated through protein-protein interactions, post-translational modifications, and proteolytic processing. These characteristics can be harnessed as tools for protein engineering. Some frame-shift mutations that convert negatively charged IDRs into positively charged ones are linked to human diseases. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the physicochemical properties and functional roles of negatively charged IDRs that compete with nucleic acids. 

   more » « less
2. Searching for a Match: Structure, Function and Application of Sequence-Specific RNA-Binding Proteins

   https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcz072  

   Dedow, Lauren K; Bailey-Serres, Julia (May 2019, Plant and Cell Physiology)

   Abstract Plants encode over 1800 RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that modulate a myriad of steps in gene regulation from chromatin organization to translation, yet only a small number of these proteins and their target transcripts have been functionally characterized. Two classes of eukaryotic RBPs, pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) and pumilio/fem-3 binding factors (PUF), recognize and bind to specific sequential RNA sequences through protein–RNA interactions. These modular proteins possess helical structural units containing key residues with high affinity for specific nucleotides, whose sequential order determines binding to a specific target RNA sequence. PPR proteins are nucleus-encoded, but largely regulate post-transcriptional gene regulation within plastids and mitochondria, including splicing, translation and RNA editing. Plant PUFs are involved in gene regulatory processes within the cell nucleus and cytoplasm. The modular structures of PPRs and PUFs that determine sequence specificity has facilitated identification of their RNA targets and biological functions. The protein-based RNA-targeting of PPRs and PUFs contrasts to the prokaryotic cluster regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-associated proteins (Cas) that target RNAs in prokaryotes. Together the PPR, PUF and CRISPR-Cas systems provide varied opportunities for RNA-targeted engineering applications. 

   more » « less
3. Many-to-one binding by intrinsically disordered protein regions

   https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811215636_0015  

   Alterovitz, W L; Faraggi, E; Oldfield, C J; Meng, J W; Xue, B; Huang, F; Romero, P; Kloczkowski, A; Uversky, V N; Dunker, A K. (January 2020, Pacific symposium on biocomputing)

   Disordered binding regions (DBRs), which are embedded within intrinsically disordered proteins or regions (IDPs or IDRs), enable IDPs or IDRs to mediate multiple protein-protein interactions. DBR-protein complexes were collected from the Protein Data Bank for which two or more DBRs having different amino acid sequences bind to the same (100% sequence identical) globular protein partner, a type of interaction herein called many-to-one binding. Two distinct binding profiles were identified: independent and overlapping. For the overlapping binding profiles, the distinct DBRs interact by means of almost identical binding sites (herein called “similar”), or the binding sites contain both common and divergent interaction residues (herein called “intersecting”). Further analysis of the sequence and structural differences among these three groups indicate how IDP flexibility allows different segments to adjust to similar, intersecting, and independent binding pockets. 

   more » « less
4. Iron–Sulfur Clusters in Zinc Finger Proteins

   https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2017.09.005  

   Shimberg, G.D.; Pritts, J.D.; Michel, S.L.J. (January 2018, Methods in enzymology)

   Zinc finger (ZF) proteins are proteins that use zinc as a structural cofactor. The common feature among all ZFs is that they contain repeats of four cysteine and/or histidine residues within their primary amino acid sequence. With the explosion of genome sequencing in the early 2000s, a large number of proteins were annotated as ZFs based solely upon amino acid sequence. As these proteins began to be characterizedexperimentally, it was discovered that some of these proteins contain iron–sulfur sites either in place of or in addition to zinc. Here, we describe methods to isolate and characterize one such ZF protein, cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 30 (CPSF3O) with respect to its metal-loading and RNA-binding activity. 

   more » « less
5. Salt bridge dynamics in protein/DNA recognition: a comparative analysis of Elk1 and ETV6

   https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP01568K  

   Vo, Tam D.; Schneider, Amelia L.; Wilson, W. David; Poon, Gregory M. (January 2021, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics)

   null (Ed.)

   Electrostatic protein/DNA interactions arise from the neutralization of the DNA phosphodiester backbone as well as coupled exchanges by charged protein residues as salt bridges or with mobile ions. Much focus has been and continues to be paid to interfacial ion pairs with DNA. The role of extra-interfacial ionic interactions, particularly as dynamic drivers of DNA sequence selectivity, remain poorly known. The ETS family of transcription factors represents an attractive model for addressing this knowledge gap given their diverse ionic composition in primary structures that fold to a tightly conserved DNA-binding motif. To probe the importance of extra-interfacial salt bridges in DNA recognition, we compared the salt-dependent binding by Elk1 with ETV6, two ETS homologs differing markedly in ionic composition. While both proteins exhibit salt-dependent binding with cognate DNA that corresponds to interfacial phosphate contacts, their nonspecific binding diverges from cognate binding as well as each other. Molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent, which generated ionic interactions in agreement with the experimental binding data, revealed distinct salt-bridge dynamics in the nonspecific complexes formed by the two proteins. Impaired DNA contact by ETV6 resulted in fewer backbone contacts in the nonspecific complex, while Elk1 exhibited a redistribution of extra-interfacial salt bridges via residues that are non-conserved between the two ETS relatives. Thus, primary structure variation in ionic residues can encode highly differentiated specificity mechanisms in a highly conserved DNA-binding motif. 

   more » « less