skip to main content

Title: Interstitial lung abnormalities in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer are associated with shorter overall survival: the Boston lung cancer study
Abstract Background Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA) can be detected on computed tomography (CT) in lung cancer patients and have an association with mortality in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The aim of this study is to demonstrate the significance of ILA for mortality in patients with stage I NSCLC using Boston Lung Cancer Study cohort. Methods Two hundred and thirty-one patients with stage I NSCLC from 2000 to 2011 were investigated in this retrospective study (median age, 69 years; 93 males, 138 females). ILA was scored on baseline CT scans prior to treatment using a 3-point scale (0 = no evidence of ILA, 1 = equivocal for ILA, 2 = ILA) by a sequential reading method. ILA score 2 was considered the presence of ILA. The difference of overall survival (OS) for patients with different ILA scores were tested via log-rank test and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) including ILA score, age, sex, smoking status, and treatment as the confounding variables. Results ILA was present in 22 out of 231 patients (9.5%) with stage I NSCLC. The presence of ILA was associated with shorter OS (patients with ILA score 2, median 3.85 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.36 – more » not reached (NR)]; patients with ILA score 0 or 1, median 10.16 years [95%CI: 8.65 - NR]; P  <  0.0001). In a Cox proportional hazards model, the presence of ILA remained significant for increased risk for death (HR = 2.88, P  = 0.005) after adjusting for age, sex, smoking and treatment. Conclusions ILA was detected on CT in 9.5% of patients with stage I NSCLC. The presence of ILA was significantly associated with a shorter OS and could be an imaging marker of shorter survival in stage I NSCLC. « less
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
Publication Date:
Journal Name:
Cancer Imaging
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the gold standard for a carefully selected patient population with end-stage lung disease. We sought to create a unique risk stratification model using only preoperative recipient data to predict one-year postoperative mortality during our pre-transplant assessment. METHODS: Data of lung transplant recipients at Houston Methodist Hospital (HMH) from 1/2009 to 12/2014 were extracted from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Patients were randomly divided into development and validation cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards models were conducted. Variables associated with 1-year mortality post-transplant were assigned weights based on the beta coefficients, and risk scores were derived. Patients were stratified into low-, medium- and high-risk categories. Our model was validated using the validation dataset and data from other US transplant centers in the UNOS database RESULTS: We randomized 633 lung recipients from HMH into the development (n=317 patients) and validation cohort (n=316). One-year survival after transplant was significantly different among risk groups: 95% (low-risk), 84% (medium-risk), and 72% (high-risk) (p<0.001) with a C-statistic of 0.74. Patient survival in the validation cohort was also significantly different among risk groups (85%, 77% and 65%, respectively, p<0.001). Validation of the model with the UNOS dataset included 9,920 patients and found 1-yearmore »survival to be 91%, 86% and 82%, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Using only recipient data collected at the time of pre-listing evaluation, our simple scoring system has good discrimination power and can be a practical tool in the assessment and selection of potential lung transplant recipients.« less
  2. Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) represents 85% of newly diagnosed lung cancers. In this study, we utilized our untargeted assignment tool Small Molecule Isotope Resolved Formula Enumerator (SMIRFE) and ultra-high-resolution Fourier transform mass spectrometry to examine lipid profile differences between paired cancerous and non-cancerous lung tissue samples from 86 patients with suspected stage I or IIA primary NSCLC. Correlation and co-occurrence analysis revealed significant lipid profile differences between cancer and non-cancer samples. Further analysis of machine-learned lipid categories for the differentially abundant molecular formulas identified a high abundance sterol, high abundance and high m/z sphingolipid, and low abundance glycerophospholipid metabolic phenotype across the NSCLC samples. At the class level, higher abundances of sterol esters and lower abundances of cardiolipins were observed suggesting altered stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) or acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase (ACAT1) activity and altered human cardiolipin synthase 1 or lysocardiolipin acyltransferase activity respectively, the latter of which is known to confer apoptotic resistance. The presence of a shared metabolic phenotype across a variety of genetically distinct NSCLC subtypes suggests that this phenotype is necessary for NSCLC development and may result from multiple distinct genetic lesions. Thus, targeting the sharedmore »affected pathways may be beneficial for a variety of genetically distinct NSCLC subtypes.« less
  3. e20551 Background: Enzyme activity is at the center of all biological processes. When these activities are misregulated by changes in sequence, expression, or activity, pathologies emerge. Misregulation of protease enzymes such as Matrix Metalloproteinases and Cathepsins play a key role in the pathophysiology of cancer. We describe here a novel class of graphene-based, cost effective biosensors that can detect altered protease activation in a blood sample from early stage lung cancer patients. Methods: The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) tool was used to identify proteases differentially expressed in lung cancer and matched normal tissue. Biosensors were assembled on a graphene backbone annotated with one of a panel of fluorescently tagged peptides. The graphene quenches fluorescence until the peptide is either cleaved by active proteases or altered by post-translational modification. 19 protease biosensors were evaluated on 431 commercially collected serum samples from non-lung cancer controls (69%) and pathologically confirmed lung cancer cases (31%) tested over two independent cohorts. Serum was incubated with each of the 19 biosensors and enzyme activity was measured indirectly as a continuous variable by a fluorescence plate reader. Analysis was performed using Emerge, a proprietary predictive and classification modeling system based on massively parallel evolving “Turing machine” algorithms.more »Each analysis stratified allocation into training and testing sets, and reserved an out-of-sample validation set for reporting. Results: 256 clinical samples were initially evaluated including 35% cancer cases evenly distributed across stages I (29%), II (26%), III (24%) and IV (21%). The case controls included common co-morbidies in the at-risk population such as COPD, chronic bronchitis, and benign nodules (19%). Using the Emerge classification analysis, biosensor biomarkers alone (no clinical factors) demonstrated Sensitivity (Se.) = 92% (CI 82%-99%) and Specificity (Sp.) = 82% (CI 69%-91%) in the out-of-sample set. An independent cohort of 175 clinical cases (age 67±8, 52% male) focused on early detection (26% cancer, 70% Stage I, 30% Stage II/III) were similarly evaluated. Classification showed Se. = 100% (CI 79%-100%) and Sp. = 93% (CI 80%-99%) in the out-of-sample set. For the entire dataset of 175 samples, Se. = 100% (CI 92%-100%) and Sp. = 97% (CI 92%-99%) was observed. Conclusions: Lung cancer can be treated if it is diagnosed when still localized. Despite clear data showing screening for lung cancer by Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) is effective, screening compliance remains very low. Protease biosensors provide a cost effective additional specialized tool with high sensitivity and specificity in detection of early stage lung cancer. A large prospective trial of at-risk smokers with follow up is being conducted to evaluate a commercial version of this assay.« less
  4. Abstract Background:

    Randomized controlled trials (RCT) play a central role in evidence-based healthcare. However, the clinical and policy implications of implementing RCTs in clinical practice are difficult to predict as the studied population is often different from the target population where results are being applied. This study illustrates the concepts of generalizability and transportability, demonstrating their utility in interpreting results from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST).


    Using inverse-odds weighting, we demonstrate how generalizability and transportability techniques can be used to extrapolate treatment effect from (i) a subset of NLST to the entire NLST population and from (ii) the entire NLST to different target populations.


    Our generalizability analysis revealed that lung cancer mortality reduction by LDCT screening across the entire NLST [16% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4–24)] could have been estimated using a smaller subset of NLST participants. Using transportability analysis, we showed that populations with a higher prevalence of females and current smokers had a greater reduction in lung cancer mortality with LDCT screening [e.g., 27% (95% CI, 11–37) for the population with 80% females and 80% current smokers] than those with lower prevalence of females and current smokers.


    This article illustrates how generalizability and transportability methods extend estimation ofmore »RCTs' utility beyond trial participants, to external populations of interest, including those that more closely mirror real-world populations.


    Generalizability and transportability approaches can be used to quantify treatment effects for populations of interest, which may be used to design future trials or adjust lung cancer screening eligibility criteria.

    « less
  5. Purpose: To develop and evaluate a deep learning (DL) approach to extract rich information from high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: We develop a DL-based model to learn a compact representation of a subject, which is predictive of COPD physiologic severity and other outcomes. Our DL model learned: (a) to extract informative regional image features from HRCT; (b) to adaptively weight these features and form an aggregate patient representation; and finally, (c) to predict several COPD outcomes. The adaptive weights correspond to the regional lung contribution to the disease. We evaluate the model on 10 300 participants from the COPDGene cohort. Results: Our model was strongly predictive of spirometric obstruction ( r2 = 0.67) and grouped 65.4% of subjects correctly and 89.1% within one stage of their GOLD severity stage. Our model achieved an accuracy of 41.7% and 52.8% in stratifying the population-based on centrilobular (5-grade) and paraseptal (3-grade) emphysema severity score, respectively. For predicting future exacerbation, combining subjects' representations from our model with their past exacerbation histories achieved an accuracy of 80.8% (area under the ROC curve of 0.73). For all-cause mortality, in Cox regression analysis, we outperformed the BODE index improvingmore »the concordance metric (ours: 0.61 vs BODE: 0.56). Conclusions: Our model independently predicted spirometric obstruction, emphysema severity, exacerbation risk, and mortality from CT imaging alone. This method has potential applicability in both research and clinical practice.« less