More Like this

1. Implementing and Assessing an Alchemical Method for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Free Energy

   https://doi.org/doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01045  

   Patel, Dharmeshkumar; Patel, Jagdish S.; Ytreberg, F. Marty (March 2021, Journal of chemical theory and computation)

   null (Ed.)

   Protein–protein binding is fundamental to most biological processes. It is important to be able to use computation to accurately estimate the change in protein–protein binding free energy due to mutations in order to answer biological questions that would be experimentally challenging, laborious, or time-consuming. Although nonrigorous free-energy methods are faster, rigorous alchemical molecular dynamics-based methods are considerably more accurate and are becoming more feasible with the advancement of computer hardware and molecular simulation software. Even with sufficient computational resources, there are still major challenges to using alchemical free-energy methods for protein–protein complexes, such as generating hybrid structures and topologies, maintaining a neutral net charge of the system when there is a charge-changing mutation, and setting up the simulation. In the current study, we have used the pmx package to generate hybrid structures and topologies, and a double-system/single-box approach to maintain the net charge of the system. To test the approach, we predicted relative binding affinities for two protein–protein complexes using a nonequilibrium alchemical method based on the Crooks fluctuation theorem and compared the results with experimental values. The method correctly identified stabilizing from destabilizing mutations for a small protein–protein complex, and a larger, more challenging antibody complex. Strong correlations were obtained between predicted and experimental relative binding affinities for both protein–protein systems. 

   more » « less
2. Predicting binding affinity changes from long‐distance mutations using molecular dynamics simulations and Rosetta

   https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26477  

   Wells, Nicholas G. M.; Smith, Colin A. (March 2023, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics)

   Abstract Computationally modeling how mutations affect protein–protein binding not only helps uncover the biophysics of protein interfaces, but also enables the redesign and optimization of protein interactions. Traditional high‐throughput methods for estimating binding free energy changes are currently limited to mutations directly at the interface due to difficulties in accurately modeling how long‐distance mutations propagate their effects through the protein structure. However, the modeling and design of such mutations is of substantial interest as it allows for greater control and flexibility in protein design applications. We have developed a method that combines high‐throughput Rosetta‐based side‐chain optimization with conformational sampling using classical molecular dynamics simulations, finding significant improvements in our ability to accurately predict long‐distance mutational perturbations to protein binding. Our approach uses an analytical framework grounded in alchemical free energy calculations while enabling exploration of a vastly larger sequence space. When comparing to experimental data, we find that our method can predict internal long‐distance mutational perturbations with a level of accuracy similar to that of traditional methods in predicting the effects of mutations at the protein–protein interface. This work represents a new and generalizable approach to optimize protein free energy landscapes for desired biological functions. 

   more » « less
3. Comparative assessment of QM-based and MM-based models for prediction of protein–ligand binding affinity trends

   https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cp00464j  

   Maier, Sarah; Thapa, Bishnu; Erickson, Jon; Raghavachari, Krishnan (June 2022, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics)

   Methods which accurately predict protein – ligand binding strengths are critical for drug discovery. In the last two decades, advances in chemical modelling have enabled steadily accelerating progress in the discovery and optimization of structure-based drug design. Most computational methods currently used in this context are based on molecular mechanics force fields that often have deficiencies in describing the quantum mechanical (QM) aspects of molecular binding. In this study, we show the competitiveness of our QM-based Molecules-in-Molecules (MIM) fragmentation method for characterizing binding energy trends for seven different datasets of protein – ligand complexes. By using molecular fragmentation, the MIM method allows for accelerated QM calculations. We demonstrate that for classes of structurally similar ligands bound to a common receptor, MIM provides excellent correlation to experiment, surpassing the more popular Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area (MM/PBSA) and Molecular Mechanics Generalized Born Surface Area (MM/GBSA) methods. The MIM method offers a relatively simple, well-defined protocol by which binding trends can be ascertained at the QM level and is suggested as a promising option for lead optimization in structure-based drug design. 

   more » « less
4. Review of COVID-19 Antibody Therapies

   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biophys-062920-063711  

   Chen, Jiahui; Gao, Kaifu; Wang, Rui; Nguyen, Duc Duy; Wei, Guo-Wei (May 2021, Annual Review of Biophysics)

   null (Ed.)

   In the global health emergency caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), efficient and specific therapies are urgently needed. Compared with traditional small-molecular drugs, antibody therapies are relatively easy to develop; they are as specific as vaccines in targeting severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); and they have thus attracted much attention in the past few months. This article reviews seven existing antibodies for neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 with 3D structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). Five 3D antibody structures associated with the SARS-CoV spike (S) protein are also evaluated for their potential in neutralizing SARS-CoV-2. The interactions of these antibodies with the S protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) are compared with those between angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 and RBD complexes. Due to the orders of magnitude in the discrepancies of experimental binding affinities, we introduce topological data analysis, a variety of network models, and deep learning to analyze the binding strength and therapeutic potential of the 14 antibody–antigen complexes. The current COVID-19 antibody clinical trials, which are not limited to the S protein target, are also reviewed. 

   more » « less
5. PDA-Pred: Predicting the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes using machine learning techniques and structural features

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2023.03.002  

   Harini, K.; Kihara, Daisuke; Michael Gromiha, M. (May 2023, Methods)

   Protein–DNA interactions play an important role in various biological processes such as gene expression, replication, and transcription. Understanding the important features that dictate the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes and predicting their affinities is important for elucidating their recognition mechanisms. In this work, we have collected the experimental binding free energy (ΔG) for a set of 391 Protein-DNA complexes and derived several structure-based features such as interaction energy, contact potentials, volume and surface area of binding site residues, base step parameters of the DNA and contacts between different types of atoms. Our analysis on relationship between binding affinity and structural features revealed that the important factors mainly depend on the number of DNA strands as well as functional and structural classes of proteins. Specifically, binding site properties such as number of atom contacts between the DNA and protein, volume of protein binding sites and interaction-based features such as interaction energies and contact potentials are important to understand the binding affinity. Further, we developed multiple regression equations for predicting the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes belonging to different structural and functional classes. Our method showed an average correlation and mean absolute error of 0.78 and 0.98 kcal/mol, respectively, between the experimental and predicted binding affinities on a jack-knife test. We have developed a webserver, PDA-PreD (Protein-DNA Binding affinity predictor), for predicting the affinity of protein-DNA complexes and it is freely available at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/pdapred/ 

   more » « less