An official website of the United States government
The Alchemical Transfer Method (ATM) is herein validated against the relative binding free energies of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes. We employed a streamlined setup workflow, a bespoke force field, and the AToM-OpenMM software to compute the relative binding free energies (RBFE) of the benchmark set prepared by Schindler and collaborators at Merck KGaA. This benchmark set includes examples of standard small R-group ligand modifications as well as more challenging scenarios, such as large R-group changes, scaffold hopping, formal charge changes, and charge-shifting transformations. The novel coordinate perturbation scheme and a dual-topology approach of ATM address some of the challenges of single-topology alchemical relative binding free energy methods. Specifically, ATM eliminates the need for splitting electrostatic and Lennard-Jones interactions, atom mapping, defining ligand regions, and post-corrections for charge-changing perturbations. Thus, ATM is simpler and more broadly applicable than conventional alchemical methods, especially for scaffold-hopping and charge-changing transformations. Here, we performed well over 500 relative binding free energy calculations for eight protein targets and found that ATM achieves accuracy comparable to existing state-of-the-art methods, albeit with larger statistical fluctuations. We discuss insights into specific strengths and weaknesses of the ATM method that will inform future deployments. This study confirms that ATM is applicable as a production tool for relative binding free energy (RBFE) predictions across a wide range of perturbation types within a unified, open-source framework.
more »
« less
Implementing and Assessing an Alchemical Method for Calculating Protein–Protein Binding Free Energy
Protein–protein binding is fundamental to most biological processes. It is important to be able to use computation to accurately estimate the change in protein–protein binding free energy due to mutations in order to answer biological questions that would be experimentally challenging, laborious, or time-consuming. Although nonrigorous free-energy methods are faster, rigorous alchemical molecular dynamics-based methods are considerably more accurate and are becoming more feasible with the advancement of computer hardware and molecular simulation software. Even with sufficient computational resources, there are still major challenges to using alchemical free-energy methods for protein–protein complexes, such as generating hybrid structures and topologies, maintaining a neutral net charge of the system when there is a charge-changing mutation, and setting up the simulation. In the current study, we have used the pmx package to generate hybrid structures and topologies, and a double-system/single-box approach to maintain the net charge of the system. To test the approach, we predicted relative binding affinities for two protein–protein complexes using a nonequilibrium alchemical method based on the Crooks fluctuation theorem and compared the results with experimental values. The method correctly identified stabilizing from destabilizing mutations for a small protein–protein complex, and a larger, more challenging antibody complex. Strong correlations were obtained between predicted and experimental relative binding affinities for both protein–protein systems.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1736253
- PAR ID:
- 10293056
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of chemical theory and computation
- ISSN:
- 1549-9618
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)A growing number of computational tools have been developed to accurately and rapidly predict the impact of amino acid mutations on protein-protein relative binding affinities. Such tools have many applications, for example, designing new drugs and studying evolutionary mechanisms. In the search for accuracy, many of these methods employ expensive yet rigorous molecular dynamics simulations. By contrast, non-rigorous methods use less exhaustive statistical mechanics, allowing for more efficient calculations. However, it is unclear if such methods retain enough accuracy to replace rigorous methods in binding affinity calculations. This trade-off between accuracy and computational expense makes it difficult to determine the best method for a particular system or study. Here, eight non-rigorous computational methods were assessed using eight antibody-antigen and eight non-antibody-antigen complexes for their ability to accurately predict relative binding affinities (ΔΔG) for 654 single mutations. In addition to assessing accuracy, we analyzed the CPU cost and performance for each method using a variety of physico-chemical structural features. This allowed us to posit scenarios in which each method may be best utilized. Most methods performed worse when applied to antibody-antigen complexes compared to non-antibody-antigen complexes. Rosetta-based JayZ and EasyE methods classified mutations as destabilizing (ΔΔG < -0.5 kcal/mol) with high (83–98%) accuracy and a relatively low computational cost for non-antibody-antigen complexes. Some of the most accurate results for antibody-antigen systems came from combining molecular dynamics with FoldX with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.46, but this was also the most computationally expensive method. Overall, our results suggest these methods can be used to quickly and accurately predict stabilizing versus destabilizing mutations but are less accurate at predicting actual binding affinities. This study highlights the need for continued development of reliable, accessible, and reproducible methods for predicting binding affinities in antibody-antigen proteins and provides a recipe for using current methods.more » « less
-
Simonson, Thomas (Ed.)This chapter discusses the theory and application of physics-based free energy methods to estimate protein-peptide binding free energies. It presents a statistical mechanics formulation of molecular binding, which is then specialized in three methodologies: (i) alchemical absolute binding free energy estimation with implicit solvation, (ii) alchemical relative binding free energy estimation with explicit solvation, and (iii) potential of mean force binding free energy estimation. Case studies of protein-peptide binding application taken from the recent literature are discussed for each method.more » « less
-
Accurate computational simulations of protein–glycan dynamics are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of critical biological mechanisms, including host–pathogen interactions, immune system defenses, and intercellular communication. The accuracy of these simulations, including molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and alchemical free energy calculations, critically relies on the appropriate parameters, including the water model, because of the extensive hydrogen bonding with glycan hydroxyl groups. However, a systematic evaluation of water models’ accuracy in simulating protein–glycan interaction at the molecular level is still lacking. In this study, we used full atomistic MD simulations and alchemical absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations to investigate the performance of five distinct water models in six protein–glycan complex systems. We evaluated water models’ impact on structural dynamics and binding affinity through over 5.8 μs of simulation time per system. Our results reveal that most protein–glycan complexes are stable in the overall structural dynamics regardless of the water model used, while some show obvious fluctuations with specific water models. More importantly, we discover that the stability of the binding motif’s conformation is dependent on the water model chosen when its residues form weak hydrogen bonds with the glycan. The water model also influences the conformational stability of the glycan in its bound state according to density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Using alchemical ABFE calculations, we find that the OPC water model exhibits exceptional consistency with experimental binding affinity data, whereas commonly used models such as TIP3P are less accurate. The findings demonstrate how different water models affect protein–glycan interactions and the accuracy of binding affinity calculations, which is crucial in developing therapeutic strategies targeting these interactions.more » « less
-
Abstract Computationally modeling how mutations affect protein–protein binding not only helps uncover the biophysics of protein interfaces, but also enables the redesign and optimization of protein interactions. Traditional high‐throughput methods for estimating binding free energy changes are currently limited to mutations directly at the interface due to difficulties in accurately modeling how long‐distance mutations propagate their effects through the protein structure. However, the modeling and design of such mutations is of substantial interest as it allows for greater control and flexibility in protein design applications. We have developed a method that combines high‐throughput Rosetta‐based side‐chain optimization with conformational sampling using classical molecular dynamics simulations, finding significant improvements in our ability to accurately predict long‐distance mutational perturbations to protein binding. Our approach uses an analytical framework grounded in alchemical free energy calculations while enabling exploration of a vastly larger sequence space. When comparing to experimental data, we find that our method can predict internal long‐distance mutational perturbations with a level of accuracy similar to that of traditional methods in predicting the effects of mutations at the protein–protein interface. This work represents a new and generalizable approach to optimize protein free energy landscapes for desired biological functions.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01045
