Ultrapure NaI(Tl) crystals are the key element for a modelindependent verification of the long standing DAMA result and a powerful means to search for the annual modulation signature of dark matter interactions. The SABRE collaboration has been developing cuttingedge techniques for the reduction of intrinsic backgrounds over several years. In this paper we report the first characterization of a 3.4 kg crystal, named NaI33, performed in an underground passive shielding setup at LNGS. NaI33 has a record low
We report the identification of metastable isomeric states of
 Award ID(s):
 1913742
 NSFPAR ID:
 10306794
 Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; more »
 Publisher / Repository:
 Springer Science + Business Media
 Date Published:
 Journal Name:
 The European Physical Journal C
 Volume:
 81
 Issue:
 8
 ISSN:
 14346044
 Format(s):
 Medium: X
 Sponsoring Org:
 National Science Foundation
More Like this

Abstract K contamination of 4.3 ± 0.2 ppb as determined by mass spectrometry. We measured a light yield of 11.1 ± 0.2 photoelectrons/keV and an energy resolution of 13.2% (FWHM/E) at 59.5 keV. We evaluated the activities of$$^{39}$$ ${}^{39}$ Ra and$$^{226}$$ ${}^{226}$ Th inside the crystal to be$$^{228}$$ ${}^{228}$ Bq/kg and$$5.9\pm 0.6~\upmu $$ $5.9\pm 0.6\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\mu $ Bq/kg, respectively, which would indicate a contamination from$$1.6\pm 0.3~\upmu $$ $1.6\pm 0.3\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\mu $ U and$$^{238}$$ ${}^{238}$ Th at partpertrillion level. We measured an activity of 0.51 ± 0.02 mBq/kg due to$$^{232}$$ ${}^{232}$ Pb out of equilibrium and a$$^{210}$$ ${}^{210}$ quenching factor of 0.63 ± 0.01 at 5304 keV. We illustrate the analyses techniques developed to reject electronic noise in the lower part of the energy spectrum. A cutbased strategy and a multivariate approach indicated a rate, attributed to the intrinsic radioactivity of the crystal, of$$\alpha $$ $\alpha $ 1 count/day/kg/keV in the [5–20] keV region.$$\sim $$ $\sim $ 
Abstract The Cryogenic Underground Observatory for Rare Events (CUORE) is the first cryogenic experiment searching for
decay that has been able to reach the onetonne mass scale. The detector, located at the Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS) in Italy, consists of an array of 988$$0\nu \beta \beta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $ crystals arranged in a compact cylindrical structure of 19 towers. CUORE began its first physics data run in 2017 at a base temperature of about 10 mK and in April 2021 released its$${\mathrm{TeO}}_{2}$$ ${\mathrm{TeO}}_{2}$ result of the search for$$3{\mathrm{rd}}$$ $3\mathrm{rd}$ , corresponding to a tonneyear of$$0\nu \beta \beta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $ exposure. This is the largest amount of data ever acquired with a solid state detector and the most sensitive measurement of$$\mathrm{TeO}_{2}$$ ${\mathrm{TeO}}_{2}$ decay in$$0\nu \beta \beta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $ ever conducted . We present the current status of CUORE search for$${}^{130}\mathrm{Te}$$ ${}^{130}\mathrm{Te}$ with the updated statistics of one tonneyr. We finally give an update of the CUORE background model and the measurement of the$$0\nu \beta \beta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $$${}^{130}\mathrm{Te}$$ ${}^{130}\mathrm{Te}$ decay halflife and decay to excited states of$$2\nu \beta \beta $$ $2\nu \beta \beta $ , studies performed using an exposure of 300.7 kg yr.$${}^{130}\mathrm{Xe}$$ ${}^{130}\mathrm{Xe}$ 
Abstract Xenon dualphase time projections chambers (TPCs) have proven to be a successful technology in studying physical phenomena that require lowbackground conditions. With
of liquid xenon (LXe) in the TPC baseline design, DARWIN will have a high sensitivity for the detection of particle dark matter, neutrinoless double beta decay ($$40\,\textrm{t}$$ $40\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}\text{t}$ ), and axionlike particles (ALPs). Although cosmic muons are a source of background that cannot be entirely eliminated, they may be greatly diminished by placing the detector deep underground. In this study, we used Monte Carlo simulations to model the cosmogenic background expected for the DARWIN observatory at four underground laboratories: Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS), Sanford Underground Research Facility (SURF), Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane (LSM) and SNOLAB. We present here the results of simulations performed to determine the production rate of$$0\upnu \upbeta \upbeta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $ Xe, the most crucial isotope in the search for$${}^{137}$$ ${}^{137}$ of$$0\upnu \upbeta \upbeta $$ $0\nu \beta \beta $ Xe. Additionally, we explore the contribution that other muoninduced spallation products, such as other unstable xenon isotopes and tritium, may have on the cosmogenic background.$${}^{136}$$ ${}^{136}$ 
Abstract This paper presents a search for dark matter,
, using events with a single top quark and an energetic$$\chi $$ $\chi $W boson. The analysis is based on proton–proton collision data collected with the ATLAS experiment at 13 TeV during LHC Run 2 (2015–2018), corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$$\sqrt{s}=$$ $\sqrt{s}=$ . The search considers final states with zero or one charged lepton (electron or muon), at least one$$^{1}$$ ${}^{1}$b jet and large missing transverse momentum. In addition, a result from a previous search considering twochargedlepton final states is included in the interpretation of the results. The data are found to be in good agreement with the Standard Model predictions and the results are interpreted in terms of 95% confidencelevel exclusion limits in the context of a class of dark matter models involving an extended twoHiggsdoublet sector together with a pseudoscalar mediator particle. The search is particularly sensitive to onshell production of the charged Higgs boson state, , arising from the twoHiggsdoublet mixing, and its semiinvisible decays via the mediator particle,$$H^{\pm }$$ ${H}^{\pm}$a : . Signal models with$$H^{\pm } \rightarrow W^\pm a (\rightarrow \chi \chi )$$ ${H}^{\pm}\to {W}^{\pm}a(\to \chi \chi )$ masses up to 1.5 TeV and$$H^{\pm }$$ ${H}^{\pm}$a masses up to 350 GeV are excluded assuming a value of 1. For masses of$$\tan \beta $$ $tan\beta $a of 150 (250) GeV, values up to 2 are excluded for$$\tan \beta $$ $tan\beta $ masses between 200 (400) GeV and 1.5 TeV. Signals with$$H^{\pm }$$ ${H}^{\pm}$ values between 20 and 30 are excluded for$$\tan \beta $$ $tan\beta $ masses between 500 and 800 GeV.$$H^{\pm }$$ ${H}^{\pm}$ 
Abstract It has been recently established in David and Mayboroda (Approximation of green functions and domains with uniformly rectifiable boundaries of all dimensions.
arXiv:2010.09793 ) that on uniformly rectifiable sets the Green function is almost affine in the weak sense, and moreover, in some scenarios such Green function estimates are equivalent to the uniform rectifiability of a set. The present paper tackles a strong analogue of these results, starting with the “flagship degenerate operators on sets with lower dimensional boundaries. We consider the elliptic operators associated to a domain$$L_{\beta ,\gamma } = {\text {div}}D^{d+1+\gamma n} \nabla $$ ${L}_{\beta ,\gamma}=\text{div}{D}^{d+1+\gamma n}\nabla $ with a uniformly rectifiable boundary$$\Omega \subset {\mathbb {R}}^n$$ $\Omega \subset {R}^{n}$ of dimension$$\Gamma $$ $\Gamma $ , the now usual distance to the boundary$$d < n1$$ $d<n1$ given by$$D = D_\beta $$ $D={D}_{\beta}$ for$$D_\beta (X)^{\beta } = \int _{\Gamma } Xy^{d\beta } d\sigma (y)$$ ${D}_{\beta}{\left(X\right)}^{\beta}={\int}_{\Gamma}{Xy}^{d\beta}d\sigma \left(y\right)$ , where$$X \in \Omega $$ $X\in \Omega $ and$$\beta >0$$ $\beta >0$ . In this paper we show that the Green function$$\gamma \in (1,1)$$ $\gamma \in (1,1)$G for , with pole at infinity, is well approximated by multiples of$$L_{\beta ,\gamma }$$ ${L}_{\beta ,\gamma}$ , in the sense that the function$$D^{1\gamma }$$ ${D}^{1\gamma}$ satisfies a Carleson measure estimate on$$\big  D\nabla \big (\ln \big ( \frac{G}{D^{1\gamma }} \big )\big )\big ^2$$ $D\nabla (ln(\frac{G}{{D}^{1\gamma}})){}^{2}$ . We underline that the strong and the weak results are different in nature and, of course, at the level of the proofs: the latter extensively used compactness arguments, while the present paper relies on some intricate integration by parts and the properties of the “magical distance function from David et al. (Duke Math J, to appear).$$\Omega $$ $\Omega $