An official website of the United States government
Hypervisors are widely deployed by cloud computing providers to support virtual machines, but their growing complexity poses a security risk, as large codebases contain many vulnerabilities. We present SeKVM, a layered Linux KVM hypervisor architecture that has been formally verified on multiprocessor hardware. Using layers, we isolate KVM's trusted computing base into a small core such that only the core needs to be verified to ensure KVM's security guarantees. Using layers, we model hardware features at different levels of abstraction tailored to each layer of software. Lower hypervisor layers that configure and control hardware are verified using a novel machine model that includes multiprocessor memory management hardware such as multi-level shared page tables, tagged TLBs, and a coherent cache hierarchy with cache bypass support. Higher hypervisor layers that build on the lower layers are then verified using a more abstract and simplified model, taking advantage of layer encapsulation to reduce proof burden. Furthermore, layers provide modularity to reduce verification effort across multiple implementation versions. We have retrofitted and verified multiple versions of KVM on Arm multiprocessor hardware, proving the correctness of the implementations and that they contain no vulnerabilities that can affect KVM's security guarantees. Our work is the first machine-checked proof for a commodity hypervisor using multiprocessor memory management hardware. SeKVM requires only modest KVM modifications and incurs only modest performance overhead versus unmodified KVM on real application workloads.
more »
« less
Formal Verification of a Multiprocessor Hypervisor on Arm Relaxed Memory Hardware
Concurrent systems software is widely-used, complex, and error-prone, posing a significant security risk. We introduce VRM, a new framework that makes it possible for the first time to verify concurrent systems software, such as operating systems and hypervisors, on Arm relaxed memory hardware. VRM defines a set of synchronization and memory access conditions such that a program that satisfies these conditions can be mostly verified on a sequentially consistent hardware model and the proofs will automatically hold on relaxed memory hardware. VRM can be used to verify concurrent kernel code that is not data race free, including code responsible for managing shared page tables in the presence of relaxed MMU hardware. Using VRM, we verify the security guarantees of a retrofitted implementation of the Linux KVM hypervisor on Arm. For multiple versions of KVM, we prove KVM's security properties on a sequentially consistent model, then prove that KVM satisfies VRM's required program conditions such that its security proofs hold on Arm relaxed memory hardware. Our experimental results show that the retrofit and VRM conditions do not adversely affect the scalability of verified KVM, as it performs similar to unmodified KVM when concurrently running many multiprocessor virtual machines with real application workloads on Arm multiprocessor server hardware. Our work is the first machine-checked proof for concurrent systems software on Arm relaxed memory hardware.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10311016
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the ACM SIGOPS 28th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Intel SGX promises powerful security: an arbitrary number of user-mode enclaves protected against physical attacks and privileged software adversaries. However, to achieve this, Intel extended the x86 architecture with an isolation mechanism approaching the complexity of an OS microkernel, implemented by an inscrutable mix of silicon and microcode. While hardware-based security can offer performance and features that are difficult or impossible to achieve in pure software, hardware-only solutions are difficult to update, either to patch security flaws or introduce new features. Komodo illustrates an alternative approach to attested, on-demand, user-mode, concurrent isolated execution. We decouple the core hardware mechanisms such as memory encryption, address-space isolation and attestation from the management thereof, which Komodo delegates to a privileged software monitor that in turn implements enclaves. The monitor's correctness is ensured by a machine-checkable proof of both functional correctness and high-level security properties of enclave integrity and confidentiality. We show that the approach is practical and performant with a concrete implementation of a prototype in verified assembly code on ARM TrustZone. Our ultimate goal is to achieve security equivalent to or better than SGX while enabling deployment of new enclave features independently of CPU upgrades. The Komodo specification, prototype implementation, and proofs are available at https://github.com/Microsoft/Komodo.more » « less
-
Parfait is a framework for proving that an implementation of a hardware security module (HSM) leaks nothing more than what is mandated by an application specification. Parfait proofs cover the software and the hardware of an HSM, which catches bugs above the cycle-level digital circuit abstraction, including timing side channels. Parfait's contribution is a scalable approach to proving security and non-leakage by using intermediate levels of abstraction and relating them with transitive information-preserving refinement. This enables Parfait to use different techniques to verify the implementation at different levels of abstraction, reuse existing verified components such as CompCert, and automate parts of the proof, while still providing end-to-end guarantees. We use Parfait to verify four HSMs, including an ECDSA certificate-signing HSM and a password-hashing HSM, on top of the OpenTitan Ibex and PicoRV32 processors. Parfait provides strong guarantees for these HSMs: for instance, it proves that the ECDSA-on-Ibex HSM implementation---2,300 lines of code and 13,500 lines of Verilog---leaks nothing more than what is allowed by a 40-line specification of its behavior.more » « less
-
ARM servers are becoming increasingly common, making server technologies such as virtualization for ARM of growing importance. We present the first study of ARM virtualization performance on server hardware, including multi-core measurements of two popular ARM and x86 hypervisors, KVM and Xen. We show how ARM hardware support for virtualization can enable much faster transitions between VMs and the hypervisor, a key hypervisor operation. However, current hypervisor designs, including both Type 1 hypervisors such as Xen and Type 2 hypervisors such as KVM, are not able to leverage this performance benefit for real application workloads on ARMv8.0. We discuss the reasons why and show that other factors related to hypervisor software design and implementation have a larger role in overall performance. Based on our measurements, we discuss software changes and new hardware features, the Virtualization Host Extensions (VHE), added in ARMv8.1 that bridge the gap and bring ARM's faster VM-to-hypervisor transition mechanism to modern Type 2 hypervisors running real applications.more » « less
-
This article surveys the landscape of security verification approaches and techniques for computer systems at various levels: from a software-application level all the way to the physical hardware level. Different existing projects are compared, based on the tools used and security aspects being examined. Since many systems require both hardware and software components to work together to provide the system’s promised security protections, it is not sufficient to verify just the software levels or just the hardware levels in a mutually exclusive fashion. This survey especially highlights system levels that are verified by the different existing projects and presents to the readers the state of the art in hardware and software system security verification. Few approaches come close to providing full-system verification, and there is still much room for improvement.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3477132.3483560
