skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 10:00 PM to 12:00 AM ET on Tuesday, March 25 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Probing coordinated co-culture cancer related motility through differential micro-compartmentalized elastic substrates
Abstract Cell development and behavior are driven by internal genetic programming, but the external microenvironment is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in cell differentiation, migration, and in the case of cancer, metastatic progression. Yet it remains unclear how the microenvironment influences cell processes, especially when examining cell motility. One factor that affects cell motility is cell mechanics, which is known to be related to substrate stiffness. Examining how cells interact with each other in response to mechanically differential substrates would allow an increased understanding of their coordinated cell motility. In order to probe the effect of substrate stiffness on tumor related cells in greater detail, we created hard–soft–hard (HSH) polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with alternating regions of different stiffness (200 and 800 kPa). We then cultured WI-38 fibroblasts and A549 epithelial cells to probe their motile response to the substrates. We found that when the 2 cell types were exposed simultaneously to the same substrate, fibroblasts moved at an increased speed over epithelial cells. Furthermore, the HSH substrate allowed us to physically guide and separate the different cell types based on their relative motile speed. We believe that this method and results will be important in a diversity of areas including mechanical microenvironment, cell motility, and cancer biology.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1946456
PAR ID:
10317848
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Scientific Reports
Volume:
10
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2045-2322
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    A monolayer of highly motile cells can establish long-range orientational order, which can be explained by hydrodynamic theory of active gels and fluids. However, it is less clear how cell shape changes and rearrangement are governed when the monolayer is in mechanical equilibrium states when cell motility diminishes. In this work, we report that rat embryonic fibroblasts (REF), when confined in circular mesoscale patterns on rigid substrates, can transition from the spindle shapes to more compact morphologies. Cells align radially only at the pattern boundary when they are in the mechanical equilibrium. This radial alignment disappears when cell contractility or cell-cell adhesion is reduced. Unlike monolayers of spindle-like cells such as NIH-3T3 fibroblasts with minimal intercellular interactions or epithelial cells like Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) with strong cortical actin network, confined REF monolayers present an actin gradient with isotropic meshwork, suggesting the existence of a stiffness gradient. In addition, the REF cells tend to condense on soft substrates, a collective cell behavior we refer to as the ‘condensation tendency’. This condensation tendency, together with geometrical confinement, induces tensile prestretch (i.e. an isotropic stretch that causes tissue to contract when released) to the confined monolayer. By developing a Voronoi-cell model, we demonstrate that the combined global tissue prestretch and cell stiffness differential between the inner and boundary cells can sufficiently define the cell radial alignment at the pattern boundary. 
    more » « less
  2. Adhesive cell–substrate interactions are crucial for cell motility and are responsible for the necessary traction that propels cells. These interactions can also change the shape of the cell, analogous to liquid droplet wetting on adhesive substrates. To address how these shape changes affect cell migration and cell speed we model motility using deformable, 2D cross-sections of cells in which adhesion and frictional forces between cell and substrate can be varied separately. Our simulations show that increasing the adhesion results in increased spreading of cells and larger cell speeds. We propose an analytical model which shows that the cell speed is inversely proportional to an effective height of the cell and that increasing this height results in increased internal shear stress. The numerical and analytical results are confirmed in experiments on motile eukaryotic cells. 
    more » « less
  3. null (Ed.)
    Cells in vivo generate mechanical traction on the surrounding 3D extracellular matrix (ECM) and neighboring cells. Such traction and biochemical cues may remodel the matrix, e.g., increase stiffness, which, in turn, influences cell functions and forces. This dynamic reciprocity mediates development and tumorigenesis. Currently, there is no method available to directly quantify single-cell forces and matrix remodeling in 3D. Here, we introduce a method to fulfill this long-standing need. We developed a high-resolution microfabricated sensor that hosts a 3D cell-ECM tissue formed by self-assembly. This sensor measures cell forces and tissue stiffness and can apply mechanical stimulation to the tissue. We measured single and multicellular force dynamics of fibroblasts (3T3), human colon (FET) and lung (A549) cancer cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF05) with 1-nN resolution. Single cells show notable force fluctuations in 3D. FET/CAF coculture system, mimicking cancer tumor microenvironment, increased tissue stiffness by three times within 24 hours. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    The mechanical micro-environment of cells and tissues influences key aspects of cell structure and function, including cell motility. For proper tissue development, cells need to migrate, interact, and form contacts. Cells are known to exert contractile forces on underlying soft substrates and sense deformations in them. Here, we propose and analyze a minimal biophysical model for cell migration and long-range cell–cell interactions through mutual mechanical deformations of the substrate. We compute key metrics of cell motile behavior, such as the number of cell-cell contacts over a given time, the dispersion of cell trajectories, and the probability of permanent cell contact, and analyze how these depend on a cell motility parameter and substrate stiffness. Our results elucidate how cells may sense each other mechanically and generate coordinated movements and provide an extensible framework to further address both mechanical and short-range biophysical interactions. 
    more » « less
  5. Senescence is a potent tumor-suppressive mechanism that irreversibly arrests the growth of damaged cells. However, senescent cells that accumulate in tissues eventually develop a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) that alters the microenvironment to promote cancer. Paracrine factors in the SASP may also contribute to the formation of rare giant polyploidal cancer cells (GPCCs). A single-cell mechanical approach was used to profile cytoskeletal and nuclear mechanics, morphology, motility, and adhesion for breast cancer cells treated with conditioned media from senescent fibroblasts. Our study showed that a small but significant population of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (less than 5%) treated with conditioned media from senescent LF-1 fibroblasts develop an enlarged morphology, chromosomal instability, and polyploidy, a phenotype associated with GPCCs. Although GPCCs are highly invasive and chemoresistant, little is known about their biophysical properties. First, we developed a method for identifying the small subpopulation of GPCCs in a heterogeneous population of cancer cells based on increased nuclear area and confirmed that GPCCs are more resistant to paclitaxel than normal-size MDA-MB-231 cells (NCCs). We then compared critical biophysical properties of NCCs and GPCCs, including cytoskeletal and nuclear mechanics, cell and nuclear morphology, motility, and adhesion. Cells were stained for cytoskeletal proteins actin, tubulin, and vinculin. Cytoskeletal organization was dramatically altered in GPCCs compared to NCCs. GPCCs displayed more disorganized microtubule structure, dense actin stress fibers, and mature focal adhesions. Intracellular particle tracking microrheology was used to measure cytoskeletal and nuclear mechanics. These studies demonstrated that although GPCCs are thought to be highly invasive cancer cells, they are inherently stiffer than NCCs, in terms of both their cytoskeletal and nuclear mechanics. This was surprising since more invasive cancer cells are often more compliant than less invasive cancer cells. This result may be in part to the ability for GPCCs to behave like activated stromal cells that stiffen in the tumor; we confirmed that GPCCs display similar adhesive behavior as activated stromal cells. To determine how mechanics correlates with cell migration, we used time-lapse nuclear tracking to measure cell motility. The average cell speed was higher for NCCs than for GPCCs; however, GPCCs moved longer distances over time because their motion was more directional. These findings highlight the unusual biophysical behavior of GPCCs. To develop pharmacologic tools that target GPCCs, it is imperative to understand their biophysical properties. 
    more » « less