skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Exploring Thread Coarsening on FPGA
Over the past few years, there has been an increased interest in including FPGAs in data centers and high-performance computing clusters along with GPUs and other accelerators. As a result, it has become increasingly important to have a unified, high-level programming interface for CPUs, GPUs and FPGAs. This has led to the development of compiler toolchains to deploy OpenCL code on FPGA. However, the fundamental architectural differences between GPUs and FPGAs have led to performance portability issues: it has been shown that OpenCL code optimized for GPU does not necessarily map well to FPGA, often requiring manual optimizations to improve performance. In this paper, we explore the use of thread coarsening - a compiler technique that consolidates the work of multiple threads into a single thread - on OpenCL code running on FPGA. While this optimization has been explored on CPU and GPU, the architectural features of FPGAs and the nature of the parallelism they offer lead to different performance considerations, making an analysis of thread coarsening on FPGA worthwhile. Our evaluation, performed on our microbenchmarks and on a set of applications from open-source benchmark suites, shows that thread coarsening can yield performance benefits (up to 3-4x speedups) to OpenCL code running on FPGA at a limited resource utilization cost.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1812727 1741683
PAR ID:
10324580
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2021 IEEE 28th International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics (HiPC)
Page Range / eLocation ID:
436 - 441
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, 2020 IEEE 26th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS))
    null (Ed.)
    While FPGAs have been traditionally considered hard to program, recently there have been efforts aimed to allow the use of high-level programming models and libraries intended for multi-core CPUs and GPUs to program FPGAs. For example, both Intel and Xilinx are now providing toolchains to deploy OpenCL code onto FPGA. However, because the nature of the parallelism offered by GPU and FPGA devices is fundamentally different, OpenCL code optimized for GPU can prove very inefficient on FPGA, in terms of both performance and hardware resource utilization. This paper explores this problem on finite automata traversal. In particular, we consider an OpenCL NFA traversal kernel optimized for GPU but exhibiting FPGA-friendly characteristics, namely: limited memory requirements, lack of synchronization, and SIMD execution. We explore a set of structural code changes, custom and best-practice optimizations to retarget this code to FPGA. We showcase the effect of these optimizations on an Intel Stratix V FPGA board using various NFA topologies from different application domains. Our evaluation shows that, while the resource requirements of the original code exceed the capacity of the FPGA in use, our optimizations lead to significant resource savings and allow the transformed code to fit the FPGA for all considered NFA topologies. In addition, our optimizations lead to speedups up to 4x over an already optimized code-variant aimed to fit the NFA traversal kernel on FPGA. Some of the proposed optimizations can be generalized for other applications and introduced in OpenCL-to-FPGA compiler. 
    more » « less
  2. ; (, CF '23: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers)
    Over the past few years, there has been an increased interest in using FPGAs alongside CPUs and GPUs in high-performance computing systems and data centers. This trend has led to a push toward the use of high-level programming models and libraries, such as OpenCL, both to lower the barriers to the adoption of FPGAs by programmers unfamiliar with hardware description languages, and to allow to deploy a single code on different devices seamlessly. Today, both Intel and Xilinx offer toolchains to compile OpenCL code onto FPGA. However, using OpenCL on FPGAs is complicated by performance portability issues, since different devices have fundamental differences in architecture and nature of hardware parallelism they offer. Hence, platform-specific optimizations are crucial to achieving good performance across devices. In this paper, we propose a code transformation to improve the performance of OpenCL codes running on FPGA. The proposed method uses pipes to separate the memory accesses and core computation within OpenCL kernels. We analyze the benefits of the approach as well as the restrictions to its applicability. Using OpenCL applications from popular benchmark suites, we show that this code transformation can result in higher utilization of the global memory bandwidth available and increased instruction concurrency, thus improving the overall throughput of OpenCL kernels at the cost of a modest resource utilization overhead. Further concurrency can be achieved by using multiple memory and compute kernels. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, IEEE)
    As FPGAs and GPUs continue to make inroads into high-performance computing (HPC), the need for languages and frameworks that offer performance, productivity, and portability across heterogeneous platforms, such as FPGAs and GPUs, continues to grow. OpenCL and SYCL have emerged as frameworks that offer cross-platform functional portability between FPGAs and GPUs. While functional portability across a diverse set of platforms is an important feature of portable frameworks, achieving performance portability often requires vendor and platform-specific optimizations. Achieving performance portability, therefore, comes at the expense of productivity. This paper presents a quantification of the tradeoffs between performance, portability, and productivity of OpenCL and SYCL. It extends and complements our prior work on quantifying performance-productivity tradeoffs between Verilog and OpenCL for the FPGA. In addition to evaluating the performance-productivity tradeoffs between OpenCL and SYCL, this work quantifies the performance portability (PP) of OpenCL and SYCL as well as their code convergence (CC), i.e., a measure of productivity across different platforms (e.g., FPGA and GPU). Using two applications as case studies (i.e., edge detection using the Sobel filter, and graph link prediction using the Jaccard similarity index), we characterize the tradeoffs between performance, portability, and productivity. Our results show that OpenCL and SYCL offer complementary tradeoffs. While OpenCL delivers better performance portability than SYCL, SYCL offers better code convergence and a 1.6× improvement in source lines of code over OpenCL. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, IEEE High Performance Extreme Computing Conference (HPEC))
    Traditionally, FPGA programming has been done via a hardware description language (HDL). An HDL provides fine-grained control over reconfigurable hardware but with limited productivity due to a steep learning curve and tedious design cycle. Thus, high-level synthesis (HLS) approaches have been a significant boon to productivity, and in recent years, OpenCL has emerged as a vendor-agnostic HLS language that offers the added benefit of interoperation with other OpenCL platforms (e.g., CPU, GPU, DSP) and existing OpenCL software. However, OpenCL's productivity can also suffer from tedious boilerplate code and the need to manually coordinate the host (i.e., CPU) and device (i.e., FPGA or other device). So, we present MetaCL, a compiler-assisted interface that takes OpenCL kernel functions as input and automatically generates OpenCL host-side code as output. MetaCL produces more efficient and readable host-side code, ensures portability, and introduces minimal additional runtime overhead compared to unassisted OpenCL development. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; (, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science)
    The two largest barriers to adoption of FPGA platforms for HPC applications are the difficulty of programming FPGAs and the performance gap when compared to GPUs. To address the first barrier, new ecosystems like Intel oneAPI, and Xilinx Vitis HLS aim to improve programmability for FPGA platforms. From a performance aspect, FPGAs trade off lower compute frequencies for more customized hardware acceleration and power efficiency when compared to GPUs. The performance for memory-bound applications on recent GPU platforms like NVIDIA’s H100 and AMD’s MI210 has also improved due to the inclusion of high-bandwidth memories (HBM), and newer FPGA platforms are also starting to include HBM in addition to traditional DRAM. To understand the current state-of-the-art and performance differences between FPGAs and GPUs, we consider realized memory bandwidth for recent FPGA and GPU platforms. We utilize a custom STREAM benchmark to evaluate two Intel FPGA platforms, the Stratix 10 SX PAC and Bittware 520N-MX, two AMD/Xilinx FPGA platforms, the Alveo U250 and Alveo U280, as well as GPU platforms from NVIDIA and AMD. We also extract power measurements and estimate memory bandwidth per Watt ((GB/s)/W) on these platforms to evaluate how FPGAs compare against GPU execution. While the GPUs far exceed the FPGAs in raw performance, the HBM equipped FPGAs demonstrate a competitive performance-power balance for larger data sizes that can be easily implemented with oneAPI and Vitis HLS kernels. These findings suggest a potential sweet spot for this emerging FPGA ecosystem to serve bandwidth limited applications in an energy-efficient fashion. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email