skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: One-electron bonds in copper–aluminum and copper–gallium complexes
Odd-electron bonds have unique electronic structures and are often encountered as transiently stable, homonuclear species. In this study, a pair of copper complexes supported by Group 13 metalloligands, M[N(( o -C 6 H 4 )NCH 2 P i Pr 2 ) 3 ] (M = Al or Ga), featuring two-center/one-electron (2c/1e) σ-bonds were synthesized by one-electron reduction of the corresponding Cu( i ) ⇢ M(III) counterparts. The copper bimetallic complexes were investigated by X-ray diffraction, cyclic voltammetry, electron paramagnetic spectroscopy, and density functional theory calculations. The combined experimental and theoretical data corroborate that the unpaired spin is delocalized across Cu, M, and ancillary atoms, and the singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) corresponds to a σ-(Cu–M) bond involving the Cu 4p z and M n s/ n p z atomic orbitals. Collectively, the data suggest the covalent nature of these interactions, which represent the first examples of odd-electron σ-bonds for the heavier Group 13 elements Al and Ga.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1954751 2054723
PAR ID:
10338415
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Chemical Science
Volume:
13
Issue:
22
ISSN:
2041-6520
Page Range / eLocation ID:
6525 to 6531
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Formal nickelate(−I) complexes bearing Group 13 metalloligands (M=Al and Ga) were isolated. These 17 ecomplexes were synthesized by one‐electron reduction of the corresponding Ni0→MIIIprecursors, and were investigated by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, EPR spectroscopy, and quantum chemical calculations. Collectively, the experimental and computational data support: 1) the strengthening of the Ni−M bond upon one‐electron reduction, and 2) the delocalization of the unpaired spin across the Ni and M atoms. An intriguing electronic configuration is revealed where three valence electrons occupy two σ‐type bonding interactions: Ni(3d)2→M and σ‐(Ni−M)1. The latter is an unusual Ni−M σ‐bonding molecular orbital that comprises primarily the Ni 4pzand M npz/ns atomic orbitals. 
    more » « less
  2. Homoleptic, tetranuclear copper( i ) pyrazolates {[3,5-( t -Bu) 2 Pz]Cu} 4 , {[3-(CF 3 )-5-( t -Bu)Pz]Cu} 4 , and {[4-Br-3,5-( i -Pr) 2 Pz]Cu} 4 are excellent stand-alone catalysts for azide–alkyne cycloaddition reactions (CuAAC). This work demonstrates that a range of pyrazolates, including those with electron donating and electron-withdrawing groups to sterically demanding substituents on the pyrazolyl backbones, can serve as effective ligand supports on tetranuclear copper catalysts. However, in contrast to the tetramers and also highly fluorinated {[3,5-(CF 3 ) 2 Pz]Cu} 3 , trinuclear copper( i ) complexes such as {[3,5-( i -Pr) 2 Pz]Cu} 3 and {[3-(CF 3 )-5-(CH 3 )Pz]Cu} 3 supported by relatively electron rich pyrazolates display poor catalytic activity in CuAAC. The behavior and degree of aggregation of several of these copper( i ) pyrazolates in solution were examined using vapor pressure osmometry. Copper( i ) complexes such as {[3,5-(CF 3 ) 2 Pz]Cu} 3 and {[3-(CF 3 )-5-( t -Bu)Pz]Cu} 4 with electron withdrawing pyrazolates were found to break up in solution to different degrees producing smaller aggregates while those such as {[3,5-( i -Pr) 2 Pz]Cu} 3 and {[3,5-( t -Bu) 2 Pz]Cu} 4 with electron rich pyrazolates remain intact. In addition, kinetic experiments were performed to understand the unusual activity of tetranuclear copper( i ) pyrazolate systems. 
    more » « less
  3. To increase the number of potential materials for application as MRI contrast agents, several Cu(II) complexes were synthesized. Cu(II) complexes were chosen because they are less expensive in comparison with the presently used Gd(III), Mn(II) and other agents. Pyridine-2-carboximidamide (1), pyrimidine-2-carboximidamide (2) and pyrazole-2-carboximidamide (3) in the form of different salts along with CuCl2 and NaCl or CuBr2 and NaBr were used to obtain four Cu(II) complexes: dichloro-pyrimidine-2-carboximidamide copper(II) (4), dibromo-pyrimidine-2-carboximidamide copper(II) (5), dichloro-pirazole-2-carboximidamide copper(II) (6), and dibromo-pirazole-2-carboximidamide copper(II) (7). X-ray diffraction analysis revealed that molecular complexes 4–7 contain square planar coordinated Cu(II) atoms and their structures are very similar, as well as their packing in crystals, which allows us to consider them isomorphs. The same synthetic approach to complex preparation where NaCl or NaBr was not used brought us to the formation of dimeric complexes μ-chloro{chloro(pyridine-2-carboximidamide)copper(II)} (8) and μ-chloro{chloro(pyrimidine-2-carboximidamide)copper(II)} (9). In the dimeric complexes, two fragments which were the same as in monomeric complexes 4–7 are held together by bridging Cu-Cl bonds making the coordination of Cu equal to 5 (square pyramid). In dimeric complexes, axial Cu-Cl bonds are 2.7360 and 2.854 Å. These values are Cu-Cl bonds on the edge of existence according to statistical data from CSD. Synthesized complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy, TGA, PXRD, EPR, and quantum chemical calculations. The higher thermal stability of monomer pyrimidine-based complexes with Cl and Br substituents makes them more prospective for further studies. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Copper(I) iodide complexes are well known for displaying a diverse array of structural features even when only small changes in ligand design are made. This structural diversity is well displayed by five copper(I) iodide compounds reported here with closely related piperidine-2,6-dithione (SNS), isoindoline-1,3-dithione (SNS6), and 6-thioxopiperidin-2-one (SNO) ligands: di-μ-iodido-bis[(acetonitrile-κ N )(6-sulfanylidenepiperidin-2-one-κ S )copper(I)], [Cu 2 I 2 (CH 3 CN) 2 (C 5 H 7 NOS) 2 ] ( I ), bis(acetonitrile-κ N )tetra-μ 3 -iodido-bis(6-sulfanylidenepiperidin-2-one-κ S )- tetrahedro -tetracopper(I), [Cu 4 I 4 (CH 3 CN) 4 (C 5 H 7 NOS) 4 ] ( II ), catena -poly[[(μ-6-sulfanylidenepiperidin-2-one-κ 2 O : S )copper(I)]-μ 3 -iodido], [CuI(C 5 H 7 NOS)] n ( III ), poly[[(piperidine-2,6-dithione-κ S )copper(I)]-μ 3 -iodido], [CuI(C 5 H 7 NS 2 )] n ( IV ), and poly[[(μ-isoindoline-1,3-dithione-κ 2 S : S )copper(I)]-μ 3 -iodido], [CuI(C 8 H 5 NS 2 )] n ( V ). Compounds I and II crystallize as discrete dimeric and tetrameric complexes, whereas III , IV , and V crystallize as polymeric two-dimensional sheets. To the best of our knowledge, compound III is the first instance of an extended hexagonal [Cu 3 I 3 ] structure that is not supported by bridging ligands. Structures I , II , and IV display weak to moderately strong Cu...Cu cuprophilic interactions [Cu...Cu internuclear distances range between 2.5803 (10) and 2.8485 (14) Å]. All structures except III display weak hydrogen-bonding interactions between the N—H of the ligand and the μ 2 and μ 3 -I − atoms. Structure III contains classical N–H...O interactions between the SNO ligands that connect the molecules in a three-dimensional framework. Complex V features π–π stacking interactions between the aryl rings of the SNS6 ligands within the same polymeric sheet. In structure IV , there were three partially occupied solvent molecules of dichloromethane and one partially occupied molecule of acetonitrile present in the asymmetric unit. The SQUEEZE routine [Spek (2015). Acta Cryst . C 71 , 9–18] was used to correct the diffraction data for diffuse scattering effects and to identify the solvent molecules. The given chemical formula and other crystal data do not take into account the solvent molecules. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract The copper(I), silver(I), and gold(I) metals bind π‐ligands by σ‐bonding and π‐back bonding interactions. These interactions were investigated using bidentate ancillary ligands with electron donating and withdrawing substituents. The π‐ligands span from ethylene to larger terminal and internal alkenes and alkynes. Results of X‐ray crystallography, NMR, and IR spectroscopy and gas phase experiments show that the binding energies increase in the order Ag 
    more » « less