More Like this

1. On Recent Large Antarctic Ozone Holes and Ozone Recovery Metrics

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095232  

   Stone, K. A.; Solomon, S.; Kinnison, D. E.; Mills, Michael J. (November 2021, Geophysical Research Letters)
2. Have improvements in ozone air quality reduced ozone uptake into plants?

   https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.399  

   Ronan, Allison C.; Ducker, Jason A.; Schnell, Jordan L.; Holmes, Christopher (January 2020, Elem Sci Anth)
3. STCN-Ozone: A Graph-Based Spatiotemporal Forecasting Framework for Modeling Tropospheric Ozone

   https://doi.org/10.1109/IRI66576.2025.00015  

   Khan, Shaian; Lor, Mohammadreza Akbari; Chen, Shu-Ching; Shyu, Mei-Ling; Christiansen, Amy (August 2025, IEEE)

   Timely and precise forecasting of ground-level ozone (O3) remains a critical challenge in atmospheric science due to the compound influences of spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability. This paper introduces STCN-Ozone, a novel graph-based spatiotemporal framework specifically designed to model ozone dynamics by jointly learning spatial interactions and temporal evolution from real-world pollutant data. The model constructs geospatial graphs based on monitoring station proximity and applies spatial encoding through a Graph Convolutional Network (GCN). These spatial representations are temporally unfolded and modeled using a dilated Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) to capture long-range temporal dependencies with high resolution. STCN-Ozone is trained on five years of ozone concentration data (1999–2003) across 451 unique locations, using 30-day sequences to predict the subsequent day’s ozone level. We use the model to estimate 95% confidence intervals to support uncertainty-aware forecasting. STCN-Ozone has been shown to be a scalable and domain-adaptive solution for operational atmospheric prediction systems. 

   more » « less
4. Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report

   https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.034  

   Archibald, A. T.; Neu, J. L.; Elshorbany, Y. F.; Cooper, O. R.; Young, P. J.; Akiyoshi, H.; Cox, R. A.; Coyle, M.; Derwent, R. G.; Deushi, M.; et al (January 2020, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene)

   null (Ed.)

   Our understanding of the processes that control the burden and budget of tropospheric ozone has changed dramatically over the last 60 years. Models are the key tools used to understand these changes, and these underscore that there are many processes important in controlling the tropospheric ozone budget. In this critical review, we assess our evolving understanding of these processes, both physical and chemical. We review model simulations from the International Global Atmospheric Chemistry Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project and Chemistry Climate Modelling Initiative to assess the changes in the tropospheric ozone burden and its budget from 1850 to 2010. Analysis of these data indicates that there has been significant growth in the ozone burden from 1850 to 2000 (approximately 43 ± 9%) but smaller growth between 1960 and 2000 (approximately 16 ± 10%) and that the models simulate burdens of ozone well within recent satellite estimates. The Chemistry Climate Modelling Initiative model ozone budgets indicate that the net chemical production of ozone in the troposphere plateaued in the 1990s and has not changed since then inspite of increases in the burden. There has been a shift in net ozone production in the troposphere being greatest in the northern mid and high latitudes to the northern tropics, driven by the regional evolution of precursor emissions. An analysis of the evolution of tropospheric ozone through the 21st century, as simulated by Climate Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 models, reveals a large source of uncertainty associated with models themselves (i.e., in the way that they simulate the chemical and physical processes that control tropospheric ozone). This structural uncertainty is greatest in the near term (two to three decades), but emissions scenarios dominate uncertainty in the longer term (2050–2100) evolution of tropospheric ozone. This intrinsic model uncertainty prevents robust predictions of near-term changes in the tropospheric ozone burden, and we review how progress can be made to reduce this limitation. 

   more » « less
5. Ozone atmospheric chemistry in southeast Michigan during the Michigan-Ontario Ozone Source Experiment (MOOSE)

   Mariscal, Noribeth; Emmons, Louisa; Jo, Duseong; Xiong, Ying; Chai, Jiajue; Huang, Yaoxian (December 2023, American Geophysical Union)