The production mechanism for terrestrial gamma ray flashes (TGFs) is not entirely understood, and details of the corresponding lightning activity and thunderstorm charge structure have yet to be fully characterized. Here we examine sub‐microsecond VHF (14–88 MHz) radio interferometer observations of a 247‐kA peak‐current EIP, or energetic in‐cloud pulse, a reliable radio signature of a subset of TGFs. The EIP consisted of three high‐amplitude sferic pulses lasting
On February 8, 2019, the Atmosphere‐Space Interaction Monitor observed a terrestrial gamma‐ray flash (TGF) and an Elve from a positive intracloud (+IC) lightning during the initial breakdown stage of a lightning flash north east of Puerto Rico. A second Elve produced by the return stroke (RS) of a negative cloud‐to‐ground (−CG) lightning was observed 456 ms later about 300 km south of the first one. Radio measurements show that a short (30 μs) and large (280 kA km) energetic in‐cloud pulse (EIP) produced the electromagnetic (EM) wave for the first Elve while the RS of the −CG was the EM source for the second Elve. Assuming that the EIP and the RS were the sources of the 777 nm emissions, both the delay relative to the ultra‐violet pulse and the shape and duration of the 777 nm emissions can be explained by scattering and absorption inside the clouds. The TGF produced by the +IC lightning had the same duration as the EIP (∼30 μs). Due to the ±80 μs timing uncertainty of the TGF, we can only state that TGF was produced just before or most likely simultaneously with the EIP. The large 777 nm pulse indicates that a large part of the EIP was produced by a current flowing in a hot channel, but it is likely that the TGF current also contributed significantly to the EIP.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 2026304
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10446057
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Volume:
- 126
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 2169-897X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract ≃ 60μ s in total, which peaked during the second (main) pulse. The EIP occurred during a normal‐polarity intracloud lightning flash that was highly unusual, in that the initial upward negative leader was particularly fast propagating and discharged a highly concentrated region of upper‐positive storm charge. The flash was initiated by a high‐power (46 kW) narrow bipolar event (NBE), and the EIP occurred about 3 ms later after≃ 3 km upward flash development. The EIP was preceded≃ 200μ s by a fast6 × 106 m/s upward negative breakdown and immediately preceded and accompanied by repeated sequences of fast (107 –108 m/s) downward then upward streamer events each lasting 10 to 20μ s, which repeatedly discharged a large volume of positive charge. Although the repeated streamer sequences appeared to be a characteristic feature of the EIP and were presumably involved in initiating it, the EIP sferic evolved independently of VHF‐producing activity, supporting the idea that the sferic was produced by relativistic discharge currents. Moreover, the relativistic currents during the main sferic pulse initiated a strong NBE‐like event comparable in VHF power (115 kW) to the highest‐power NBEs. -
In this study, we analyze 44 terrestrial gamma-ray flashes (TGFs) detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) occurring in 2014–2016 in conjunction with data from the U.S. National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN). We examine the characteristics of magnetic field waveforms measured by NLDN sensors for 61 pulses that occurred within 5 ms of the start-time of the TGF photon flux. For 21 (out of 44) TGFs, the associated NLDN pulse occurred almost simultaneously with (that is, within 200 μs of) the TGF. One TGF had two NLDN pulses within 200 μs. The median absolute time interval between the beginning of these near-simultaneous pulses and the TGF flux start-time is 50 μs. We speculate that these RF pulses are signatures of either TGF-associated relativistic electron avalanches or currents traveling in conducting paths “preconditioned” by TGF-associated electron beams. Compared to pulses that were not simultaneous with TGFs (but within 5 ms of one), simultaneous pulses had higher median absolute peak current (26 kA versus 11 kA), longer median threshold-to-peak rise time (14 μs versus 2.8 μs), and longer median peak-to-zero time (15 μs versus 5.5 μs). A majority (77%) of our simultaneous RF pulses had NLDN-estimated peak currents less than 50 kA indicating that TGF emissions can be associated with moderate-peak-amplitude processes. The lightning flash associated with one of the TGFs in our data set was observed by a Lightning Mapping Array, which reported a relatively high-power source at an altitude of 25 km occurring 101 μs after the GBM-reported TGF discovery-bin start-time.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Do terrestrial gamma‐ray flashes (TGFs) produce their own radio signatures? To explore this question, we analyze TGF data from the Fermi Gamma‐ray Burst Monitor, independent lightning geolocation data from the National Lightning Detection Network, and low‐frequency (LF) magnetic field waveforms, to determine the relationship between TGF generation and LF waveforms. LF waveforms associated with six TGFs are found to contain a clear and isolated slow pulse (~80‐μs duration) within a sequence of multiple fast pulses (<10‐μs risetime). We find that the slow LF pulse is produced simultaneously with the observed gamma rays, with an uncertainty as small as 7 μs. Simultaneity implies a consistent TGF source altitude range of approximately 10–15 km, which is consistent with previous estimates. These findings provide important evidence that the slow LF pulse, when observed, is associated with TGF production and perhaps produced by the electron acceleration itself.
-
more » « less
Abstract A positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) lightning flash containing a single stroke with a peak current of approximately +310 kA followed by a long continuing current triggered seven upward lightning flashes from tall structures. The flashes were observed on 4 June 2016 at the Tall Object Lightning Observatory in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. The optical and electric field characteristics of these flashes were analyzed using synchronized two‐station data from two high‐speed video cameras, one total‐sky lightning channel imager, two lightning channel imagers, and two sets of slow and fast electric field measuring systems. Three upward flashes were initiated sequentially in the field of view of high‐speed video cameras. One of them was initiated approximately 0.35 ms after the return stroke of +CG flash from the Canton Tower, the tallest structure within a 12‐km radius of the +CG flash, while the other two upward flashes were initiated from two other, more distant tall objects, approximately 18 ms after the +CG flash stroke. The initiation of the latter two upward flashes could be caused by the combined effect of the return stroke of +CG flash, its associated continuing current, and K process in the cloud. Each of these three upward flashes contained multiple downward leader/upward return stroke sequences, with the first leader/return stroke sequence of the second and third flashes occurring only after the completion of the last leader/return stroke sequence of the preceding flash. The total number of strokes in the three upward flashes was 13, and they occurred over approximately 1.5 s.
-
more » « less
Abstract In this paper, we present the first high‐speed video observation of a cloud‐to‐ground lightning flash and its associated downward‐directed Terrestrial Gamma‐ray Flash (TGF). The optical emission of the event was observed by a high‐speed video camera running at 40,000 frames per second in conjunction with the Telescope Array Surface Detector, Lightning Mapping Array, interferometer, electric‐field fast antenna, and the National Lightning Detection Network. The cloud‐to‐ground flash associated with the observed TGF was formed by a fast downward leader followed by a very intense return stroke peak current of −154 kA. The TGF occurred while the downward leader was below cloud base, and even when it was halfway in its propagation to ground. The suite of gamma‐ray and lightning instruments, timing resolution, and source proximity offer us detailed information and therefore a unique look at the TGF phenomena.
