An official website of the United States government
K-12 schools utilize a growing number of technologies to operate effectively, ranging from technologies for learning to technologies that manage student and personnel data. We share findings from an analysis of 23 school district websites for technologies used in a number of K-12 school districts surrounding a public, research university in a southeast region of the United States. In addition, we also share findings on technologies used in K-12 school districts from interviews with 12 technology directors. We propose a technology classification framework including educational technologies, management technologies, support technologies, networking technologies, and security technologies in addition to identifying various technologies that are currently used by school districts based on this framework. This framework has implications for K-12 technology adoption and clarifying the roles of school technology personnel.
more »
« less
Constructing a visualization dashboard to improve educational standards in Arizona legislative districts
The quality of K-12 public education is a perennial issue in Arizona that has heightened in salience over the past several years, with broad public concerns over insufficient funding sparking the Red for Ed movement for higher teacher pay. However, despite the push for educational change, there remain many barriers to K-12 public school education funding, including a lack of visibility for how Arizona public schools are performing at a legislative district level. Such information is released at a school district level by organizations like the Arizona Department of Education, but much of the information is limited and can be difficult for legislators to parse, particularly when school districts lie on the boundary between two legislative districts. Moreover, school outcome data is often limited to raw spreadsheets for the public and may be fragmented between government websites and educational organizations depending on the metric. Ultimately, this hinders the public’s understanding of the current educational standing. As such, a visualization dashboard that clearly identifies schools and their relative performance within each legislative district would be an invaluable tool for legislative bodies and the Arizona public. It is proposed that a dashboard for Arizona at the district level would increase transparency and availability of public information about these districts, allowing legislators to utilize the dashboard as a tool for greater understanding and more effective policymaking. While there are many positive social implications to be afforded by educational dashboards, this article also points to potential risks of this new visibility without end-user training.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1828010
- PAR ID:
- 10344522
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 8
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Increased use of technology in schools raises new privacy and security challenges for K-12 students---and harms such as commercialization of student data, exposure of student data in security breaches, and expanded tracking of students---but the extent of these challenges is unclear. In this paper, first, we interviewed 18 school officials and IT personnel to understand what educational technologies districts use and how they manage student privacy and security around these technologies. Second, to determine if these educational technologies are frequently endorsed across United States (US) public schools, we compiled a list of linked educational technology websites scraped from 15,573 K-12 public school/district domains and analyzed them for privacy risks. Our findings suggest that administrators lack resources to properly assess privacy and security issues around educational technologies even though they do pose potential privacy issues. Based on these findings, we make recommendations for policymakers, educators, and the CHI research community.more » « less
-
Problem. As school districts develop K-12 computer science pathways, they seek guidance and examples from other districts with established pathways. Research Question. Our research question for this project was: How have K-12 school districts in a Midwest state built and implemented a K-12 CS pathway? Methodology. We conducted virtual interviews with 15 representatives from 11 Midwest school districts on developing CS pathways, using a semi-structured protocol and thematic analysis. Findings. CS pathways are often initiated by champions, frequently beginning in high school and progressing to elementary then middle school. CS teachers find it challenging to meet, a variety of funding sources are used, and equity often focuses on student enrollment. Implications. Many school districts need to create CS pathways while others continue to build and refine their pathways; many of whom desire support in that process. The findings can be used by districts, support organizations and policymakers to inform the development of CS pathways.more » « less
-
Schools and school districts are complex, dynamic systems affected by numerous factors, specific to the particular environment. These factors, which range from the stability of the home life of the enrolled children, to the interpersonal relationships of the school staff, to the funding decisions of the school board, to the laws passed by the U.S. Congress (and innumerable additional factors in between), all interact in sometimes predictable but often completely surprising ways. Educational initiatives and interventions that work well in one environment can prove completely ineffective (or un-implementable) in a different school setting, for a myriad of reasons. For university faculty and STEM professionals who partner with K-12 schools to implement and assess STEM educational reform initiatives, particularly for those who choose to work or scale up projects in non-charter or non-specialized lab school settings, the complexity of the system of K-12 education makes it difficult to identify all the potential barriers that can impact the proposed project. Unexpected factors can easily derail an otherwise well thought-out project, both in terms of project implementation and also in the success of assessing student outcomes. Educational researchers have long studied school reform and the issues of what facilitates and hinders success in curricular and other interventions. Experts in educational policy and public policy also have studied the interaction of policies and practices of reform agendas within social and organizational contexts. Industrial engineering, which had its origins in studying manufacturing systems, is a field where researchers have made great contributions towards understanding complex systems including transportation systems, financial systems, health care, and even recently humanitarian support systems. The Advanced Manufacturing and Prototyping Integrated to Unlock Potential (AMP-IT-UP) NSF Math/Science Partnership at the Georgia Institute of Technology is creating an innovative framework, which is both conceptual and theoretical and rooted within the field of industrial and systems engineering, to examine barriers and enablers to school change and reform. The framework describes the system in terms of both agents and the attributes of those agents and will become the foundation for identifying a subset of attribute combinations that allow for successful change in the system. In this paper we describe the first step in creating this framework, namely identifying the agents within K-12 education and the attributes of these agents that are critical to educational change. The paper also presents a sample scale for describing these attributes.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The U.S. Department of Education made recent technical changes reducing eligibility for the Rural and Low-Income School Program. Given smaller budgets and lower economies of scale, rural districts may be less able to absorb short-term funding cuts and experience stronger negative achievement effects. Kansas implemented a state-level finance change (block grant funding) after 2015, which froze district revenue regardless of enrollment and reduced funding in districts where enrollment increased. Difference-in-differences models compare achievement before and after block grant implementation to estimate effects of funding cuts separately in rural and nonrural districts. Between-state and within-state comparisons offer complementary identification strategies in which the strengths of one approach help address limitations of the other. Revenue/spending reductions are similar by geography but represent a larger fraction of rural district budgets. Results indicate that revenue reductions have larger implications for achievement in rural areas, where they represent a larger proportion of the total budget.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS52410.2021.9629195
