skip to main content

Title: DEC-LOS-RRT: Decentralized Path Planning for Multi-robot Systems with Line-of-sight Constrained Communication
Decentralized planning for multi-agent systems, such as fleets of robots in a search-and-rescue operation, is often constrained by limitations on how agents can communicate with each other. One such limitation is the case when agents can communicate with each other only when they are in line-of-sight (LOS). Developing decentralized planning methods that guarantee safety is difficult in this case, as agents that are occluded from each other might not be able to communicate until it’s too late to avoid a safety violation. In this paper, we develop a decentralized planning method that explicitly avoids situations where lack of visibility of other agents would lead to an unsafe situation. Building on top of an existing Rapidly exploring Random Tree (RRT)-based approach, our method guarantees safety at each iteration. Simulation studies show the effectiveness of our method and compare the degradation in performance with respect to a clairvoyant decentralized planning algorithm where agents can communicate despite not being in LOS of each other.
Authors:
; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1743772
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10356666
Journal Name:
2021 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA)
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
103 to 110
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) are expected to enable reliable and efficient transportation systems. Most motion planning algorithms for multi-agent systems are not completely safe because they implicitly assume that all vehicles/agents will execute the expected plan with a small error. This assumption, however, is hard to keep for CAVs since they may have to slow down (e.g., to yield to a jaywalker) or are forced to stop (e.g. break down), sometimes even without a notice. Responsibility-Sensitive Safety (RSS) defines a set of safety rules for each driving scenario to ensure that a vehicle will not cause an accident irrespective of other vehicles' behavior. RSS rules, however, are hard to evaluate for merge, intersection, and unstructured road scenarios. In addition, deadlock situations can happen that are not considered by the RSS. In this paper, we propose a generic version of RSS rules for CAVs that can be applied to any driving scenario. We integrate the proposed RSS rules with the CAV's motion planning algorithm to enable cooperative driving of CAVs. Our approach can also detect and resolve deadlocks in a decentralized manner. We have conducted experiments to verify that a CAV does not cause an accident no matter when other CAVsmore »slow down or stop. We also showcase our deadlock detection and resolution mechanism. Finally, we compare the average velocity and fuel consumption of vehicles when they drive autonomously but not connected with the case that they are connected.« less
  2. In open agent systems, the set of agents that are cooperating or competing changes over time and in ways that are nontrivial to predict. For example, if collaborative robots were tasked with fighting wildfires, they may run out of suppressants and be temporarily unavailable to assist their peers. We consider the problem of planning in these contexts with the additional challenges that the agents are unable to communicate with each other and that there are many of them. Because an agent's optimal action depends on the actions of others, each agent must not only predict the actions of its peers, but, before that, reason whether they are even present to perform an action. Addressing openness thus requires agents to model each other's presence, which becomes computationally intractable with high numbers of agents. We present a novel, principled, and scalable method in this context that enables an agent to reason about others' presence in its shared environment and their actions. Our method extrapolates models of a few peers to the overall behavior of the many-agent system, and combines it with a generalization of Monte Carlo tree search to perform individual agent reasoning in many-agent open environments. Theoretical analyses establish the numbermore »of agents to model in order to achieve acceptable worst case bounds on extrapolation error, as well as regret bounds on the agent's utility from modeling only some neighbors. Simulations of multiagent wildfire suppression problems demonstrate our approach's efficacy compared with alternative baselines.« less
  3. In many real-world scenarios, the time it takes for a mobile agent, e.g., a robot, to move from one location to another may vary due to exogenous events and be difficult to predict accurately. Planning in such scenarios is challenging, especially in the context of Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF), where the goal is to find paths to multiple agents and temporal coordination is necessary to avoid collisions. In this work, we consider a MAPF problem with this form of time uncertainty, where we are only given upper and lower bounds on the time it takes each agent to move. The objective is to find a safe solution, which is a solution that can be executed by all agents and is guaranteed to avoid collisions. We propose two complete and optimal algorithms for finding safe solutions based on well-known MAPF algorithms, namely, A* with Operator Decomposition (A* + OD) and Conflict-Based Search (CBS). Experimentally, we observe that on several standard MAPF grids the CBS-based algorithm performs better. We also explore the option of online replanning in this context, i.e., modifying the agents' plans during execution, to reduce the overall execution cost. We consider two online settings: (a) when an agent can sensemore »the current time and its current location, and (b) when the agents can also communicate seamlessly during execution. For each setting, we propose a replanning algorithm and analyze its behavior theoretically and empirically. Our experimental evaluation confirms that indeed online replanning in both settings can significantly reduce solution cost.« less
  4. Robust trajectory execution is an extension of cooperative collision avoidance that takes pre-planned trajectories directly into account. We propose an algorithm for robust trajectory execution that compensates for a variety of dynamic changes, including newly appearing obstacles, robots breaking down, imperfect motion execution, and external disturbances. Robots do not communicate with each other and only sense other robots’ positions and the obstacles around them. At the high-level we use a hybrid planning strategy employing both discrete planning and trajectory optimization with a dynamic receding horizon approach. The discrete planner helps to avoid local minima, adjusts the planning horizon, and provides good initial guesses for the optimization stage. Trajectory optimization uses a quadratic programming formulation, where all safety-critical parts are formulated as hard constraints. At the low-level, we use buffered Voronoi cells as a multi-robot collision avoidance strategy. Compared to ORCA, our approach supports higher-order dynamic limits and avoids deadlocks better. We demonstrate our approach in simulation and on physical robots, showing that it can operate in real time.
  5. Robust trajectory execution is an extension of cooperative collision avoidance that takes pre-planned trajectories directly into account. We propose an algorithm for robust trajectory execution that compensates for a variety of dynamic changes, including newly appearing obstacles, robots breaking down, imperfect motion execution, and external disturbances. Robots do not communicate with each other and only sense other robots’ positions and the obstacles around them. At the high-level we use a hybrid planning strategy employing both discrete planning and trajectory optimization with a dynamic receding horizon approach. The discrete planner helps to avoid local minima, adjusts the planning horizon, and provides good initial guesses for the optimization stage. Trajectory optimization uses a quadratic programming formulation, where all safety-critical parts are formulated as hard constraints. At the low-level, we use buffered Voronoi cells as a multi-robot collision avoidance strategy. Compared to ORCA, our approach supports higher-order dynamic limits and avoids deadlocks better. We demonstrate our approach in simulation and on physical robots, showing that it can operate in real time.