More Like this

1. Efficient Interactive Proofs for Non-Deterministic Bounded Space

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.47  

   Cook, Joshua; Rothblum, Ron D. (September 2023, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023))

   Megow, Nicole; Smith, Adam (Ed.)

   The celebrated IP = PSPACE Theorem gives an efficient interactive proof for any bounded-space algorithm. In this work we study interactive proofs for non-deterministic bounded space computations. While Savitch’s Theorem shows that nondeterministic bounded-space algorithms can be simulated by deterministic bounded-space algorithms, this simulation has a quadratic overhead. We give interactive protocols for nondeterministic algorithms directly to get faster verifiers. More specifically, for any non-deterministic space S algorithm, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n+S²). This improves on the best previous bound of Õ(n+S³) and matches the result for deterministic space bounded algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors. We further generalize to alternating bounded space algorithms. For any language L decided by a time T, space S algorithm that uses d alternations, we construct an interactive proof in which the verifier runs in time Õ(n + S log(T) + S d) and the prover runs in time 2^O(S). For d = O(log(T)), this matches the best known interactive proofs for deterministic algorithms, up to polylog(S) factors, and improves on the previous best verifier time for nondeterministic algorithms by a factor of log(T). We also improve the best prior verifier time for unbounded alternations by a factor of S. Using known connections of bounded alternation algorithms to bounded depth circuits, we also obtain faster verifiers for bounded depth circuits with unbounded fan-in. 

   more » « less
2. Quantum algorithms and approximating polynomials for composed functions with shared inputs

   https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2021-09-16-543  

   Bun, Mark; Kothari, Robin; Thaler, Justin (September 2021, Quantum)

   We give new quantum algorithms for evaluating composed functions whose inputs may be shared between bottom-level gates. Let f be an m -bit Boolean function and consider an n -bit function F obtained by applying f to conjunctions of possibly overlapping subsets of n variables. If f has quantum query complexity Q ( f ) , we give an algorithm for evaluating F using O ~ ( Q ( f ) ⋅ n ) quantum queries. This improves on the bound of O ( Q ( f ) ⋅ n ) that follows by treating each conjunction independently, and our bound is tight for worst-case choices of f . Using completely different techniques, we prove a similar tight composition theorem for the approximate degree of f .By recursively applying our composition theorems, we obtain a nearly optimal O ~ ( n 1 − 2 − d ) upper bound on the quantum query complexity and approximate degree of linear-size depth- d AC 0 circuits. As a consequence, such circuits can be PAC learned in subexponential time, even in the challenging agnostic setting. Prior to our work, a subexponential-time algorithm was not known even for linear-size depth-3 AC 0 circuits.As an additional consequence, we show that AC 0 ∘ ⊕ circuits of depth d + 1 require size Ω ~ ( n 1 / ( 1 − 2 − d ) ) ≥ ω ( n 1 + 2 − d ) to compute the Inner Product function even on average. The previous best size lower bound was Ω ( n 1 + 4 − ( d + 1 ) ) and only held in the worst case (Cheraghchi et al., JCSS 2018). 

   more » « less
3. Tighter MA/1 Circuit Lower Bounds from Verifier Efficient PCPs for PSPACE

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.APPROX/RANDOM.2023.55  

   Cook, Joshua; Moshkovitz, Dana (September 2024, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2023))

   Megow, Nicole; Smith, Adam (Ed.)

   We prove that for some constant a > 1, for all k ≤ a, MATIME[n^{k(1+o(1))}]/1 ⊄ SIZE[O(n^k)], for some specific o(1) function. This is a super linear polynomial circuit lower bound. Previously, Santhanam [Santhanam, 2007] showed that there exists a constant c>1 such that for all k>1: MATIME[n^{ck}]/1 ⊄ SIZE[O(n^k)]. Inherently to Santhanam’s proof, c is a large constant and there is no upper bound on c. Using ideas from Murray and Williams [Murray and Williams, 2018], one can show for all k>1: MATIME [n^{10 k²}]/1 ⊄ SIZE[O(n^k)]. To prove this result, we construct the first PCP for SPACE[n] with quasi-linear verifier time: our PCP has a Õ(n) time verifier, Õ(n) space prover, O(log(n)) queries, and polynomial alphabet size. Prior to this work, PCPs for SPACE[O(n)] had verifiers that run in Ω(n²) time. This PCP also proves that NE has MIP verifiers which run in time Õ(n). 

   more » « less
4. Stabilizer Entanglement Distillation and Efficient Fault-Tolerant Encoders

   https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010339  

   Shi, Yu; Patil, Ashlesha; Guha, Saikat (March 2025, PRX Quantum)

   Entanglement is essential for quantum information processing, but is limited by noise. We address this by developing high-yield entanglement distillation protocols with several advancements. (1) We extend the 2-to-1 recurrence entanglement distillation protocol to higher-rate n-to-(n−1) protocols that can correct any single-qubit errors. These protocols are evaluated through numerical simulations focusing on fidelity and yield. We also outline a method to adapt any classical error-correcting code for entanglement distillation, where the code can correct both bit-flip and phase-flip errors by incorporating Hadamard gates. (2) We propose a constant-depth decoder for stabilizer codes that transforms logical states into physical ones using single-qubit measurements. This decoder is applied to entanglement distillation protocols, reducing circuit depth and enabling protocols derived from high-performance quantum error-correcting codes. We demonstrate this by evaluating the circuit complexity for entanglement distillation protocols based on surface codes and quantum convolutional codes. (3) Our stabilizer entanglement distillation techniques advance quantum computing. We propose a fault-tolerant protocol for constant-depth encoding and decoding of arbitrary states in surface codes, with potential extensions to more general quantum low-density parity-check codes. This protocol is feasible with state-of-the-art reconfigurable atom arrays and surpasses the limits of conventional logarithmic depth encoders. Overall, our study integrates stabilizer formalism, measurement-based quantum computing, and entanglement distillation, advancing both quantum communication and computing. 

   more » « less
5. Lattice Problems beyond Polynomial Time

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3564246.3585227  

   Aggarwal, Divesh; Bennett, Huck; Brakerski, Zvika; Golovnev, Alexander; Kumar, Rajendra; Li, Zeyong; Peters, Spencer; Stephens-Davidowitz, Noah; Vaikuntanathan, Vinod (July 2023, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing)

   Servedio, Rocco (Ed.)

   We study the complexity of lattice problems in a world where algorithms, reductions, and protocols can run in superpolynomial time, revisiting four foundational results: two worst-case to average-case reductions and two protocols. We also show a novel protocol. 1. We prove that secret-key cryptography exists if O˜(n‾√)-approximate SVP is hard for 2εn-time algorithms. I.e., we extend to our setting (Micciancio and Regev's improved version of) Ajtai's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O˜(n)-approximate SVP to SIS. 2. We prove that public-key cryptography exists if O˜(n)-approximate SVP is hard for 2εn-time algorithms. This extends to our setting Regev's celebrated polynomial-time worst-case to average-case reduction from O˜(n1.5)-approximate SVP to LWE. In fact, Regev's reduction is quantum, but ours is classical, generalizing Peikert's polynomial-time classical reduction from O˜(n2)-approximate SVP. 3. We show a 2εn-time coAM protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP, generalizing the celebrated polynomial-time protocol for O(n/logn‾‾‾‾‾‾‾√)-CVP due to Goldreich and Goldwasser. These results show complexity-theoretic barriers to extending the recent line of fine-grained hardness results for CVP and SVP to larger approximation factors. (This result also extends to arbitrary norms.) 4. We show a 2εn-time co-non-deterministic protocol for O(logn‾‾‾‾‾√)-approximate SVP, generalizing the (also celebrated!) polynomial-time protocol for O(n‾√)-CVP due to Aharonov and Regev. 5. We give a novel coMA protocol for O(1)-approximate CVP with a 2εn-time verifier. All of the results described above are special cases of more general theorems that achieve time-approximation factor tradeoffs. 

   more » « less