An official website of the United States government
Abstract High‐speed video and electric field change data were used to analyze the initiation and propagation of four predominantly vertical bidirectional leaders making connection to a predominantly horizontal channel previously formed aloft. The four bidirectional leaders sequentially developed along the same path and served to form a positive branch of the horizontal in‐cloud channel, which became a downward positive leader producing a 135‐kA positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) return stroke. The positive (lower) end of each bidirectional leader elongated abruptly at the time of connection of the negative (upper) end to the pre‐existing channel aloft. Thirty‐six negative streamer‐like filaments (resembling recently reported “needles”) extended sideways over ∼110 to 740 m from the pre‐existing horizontal channel at speeds of ∼0.5 to 1.9 × 107 m/s, in response to the injection of negative charge associated with the +CG.
more »
« less
High‐Speed Video Observations of Recoil Leaders Producing and Not Producing Return Strokes in a Canton‐Tower Upward Flash
Abstract High‐speed video and electric field change data have been used to examine the initiation and propagation of 21 recoil leaders, 7 of which evolved into dart (or dart‐stepped) leaders (DLs) initiating return strokes and 14 were attempted leaders (ALs), in a Canton‐Tower upward flash. Three DLs and two ALs clearly exhibited bidirectional extension. Each DL was preceded by one or more ALs and initiated near the extremity of the positive end of the preceding AL. The positive end of each bidirectional DL generally appeared to be inactive (stationary) or intermittently propagated along the positive part of the preceding AL channel and extended into the virgin air. A sequence of two floating channel segments was formed ahead of the approaching positive end of one DL, causing its abrupt elongation.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1701484
- PAR ID:
- 10362050
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 14
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 8546-8553
- Size(s):
- p. 8546-8553
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract We examined three descending positive leaders at distances of 5–11 km and three descending negative leaders at distances of 6–7 km, all simultaneously imaged by high‐speed framing cameras operating in the visible and UV ranges. UV images (290–370 nm) of the positive leaders each exhibited a strong embellishment at the lower channel end, which was not observed in the corresponding visible images (480–800 nm). In contrast, none of the negative leaders exhibited channel embellishment in the UV range and their morphology in UV was similar to that in the visible. Additionally, no embellishment was seen in four negative leaders imaged in UV only. The observed UV embellishment, which is likely to be the streamer zone at the positive‐leader tip, appeared to undergo expansion‐contraction cycles. We attributed the lack of detectable streamer‐zone emission in the UV range in negative leaders to a much lower streamer generation rate compared to positive leaders.more » « less
-
Abstract Previous studies have shown that subsequent leaders in positive cloud‐to‐ground lightning (+CG) flashes rarely traverse pre‐existing channels to ground. In this paper, we present evidence that this actually can be common, at least for some thunderstorms. Observations of +CG flashes in a supercell storm in Argentina by Córdoba Argentina Marx Meter Array (CAMMA) are presented, in which 54 (64%) of 84 multiple‐stroke +CG flashes had subsequent leaders following a pre‐existing channel to ground. These subsequent positive leaders are found to behave similarly to their negative counterparts, including propagation speeds along pre‐existing channels with a median of 8 × 106 m/s, which is comparable to that of negative dart leaders. Two representative multiple‐stroke +CG flashes are presented and discussed in detail. The observations reported herein call for an update to the traditional explanation of the disparity between positive and negative lightning.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Abstract Time-correlated high-speed video and electric field change data for 139 natural, negative cloud-to-ground (CG)-lightning flashes reveal 615 return strokes (RSs) and 29 upward-illumination (UI)-type strokes. Among 121 multi-stroke flashes, 56% visibly connected to more than one ground location for either a RS or UI-type stroke. The number of separate ground-stroke connection locations per CG flash averaged 1.74, with maximum 6. This study examines the 88 subsequent strokes that involved a subsequent stepped leader (SSL), either reaching ground or intercepting a former leader to ground, in 61 flashes. Two basic modes by which these SSLs begin are described and are termed dart - then - stepped leaders herein. One inception mode occurs when a dart leader deflects from the prior main channel and begins propagating as a stepped leader to ground. In these ‘divert’ mode cases, the relevant interstroke time from the prior RS in the channel to the SSL inception from that path is long, ranging from 105 to 204 ms in four visible cases. The alternative mode of SSL inception occurs when a dart leader reaches the end of a prior unsuccessful branch—of an earlier competing dart leader, stepped leader, or initial leader—then begins advancing as a stepped leader toward ground. In this more common ‘branch’ mode (85% of visible cases), there may be no portion of the subsequent RS channel that is shared with a prior RS channel. These two inception modes, and variations among them, can occur in different subsequent strokes of the same flash.more » « less
-
Abstract The dissonant development of positive and negative lightning leaders is a central question in atmospheric electricity. It is also the likely root cause of other reported asymmetries between positive and negative lightning flashes, including the ones regarding: stroke multiplicity, recoil activity, leader velocities, and emission of energetic radiation. In an effort to contrast lightning leaders of different polarities, we highlight the staggering differences between two rocket‐triggered lightning flashes. The flash beginning with upward positive leaders exhibits an initial continuous current stage followed by multiple sequences of dart leaders and return strokes. On the other, in its opposite‐polarity counterpart, the upward development of negative leaders is by itself the entire flash. As a result, the flash with negative leaders is faster, briefer, transfers less charge to the ground, has lower currents, and smaller spatial extent. We conclude by presenting a discussion on the three fundamental leader propagation modes.more » « less
