Search for: All records

Using visible‐range and infrared (3–5 µm) high‐speed video cameras, we observed collisions of adjacent branches in downward negative stepped leaders. Typically, a lagging (chasing) branch (CB) approached a leading branch (LB) from aside at about 90° angle and connected to the lateral surface of the LB within some tens of meters or less of its tip. We infer that collisions can be facilitated by the attracting force of upward moving positive‐charge wave associated with stepping at the leading branch tip. Outcomes of branch collisions differ. The chasing branch may be absorbed by the LB, rebound, or temporarily bridge two branches. It appears that a heavily branched negative stepped leader creates a highly structured and rapidly changing electric field pattern inside the volume it occupies. We observed abrupt changes in the direction of branch extension, suggesting that the direction of local electric field can differ significantly from the ambient.

High‐speed video and electric field change data were used to analyze the initiation and propagation of four predominantly vertical bidirectional leaders making connection to a predominantly horizontal channel previously formed aloft. The four bidirectional leaders sequentially developed along the same path and served to form a positive branch of the horizontal in‐cloud channel, which became a downward positive leader producing a 135‐kA positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) return stroke. The positive (lower) end of each bidirectional leader elongated abruptly at the time of connection of the negative (upper) end to the pre‐existing channel aloft. Thirty‐six negative streamer‐like filaments (resembling recently reported “needles”) extended sideways over ∼110 to 740 m from the pre‐existing horizontal channel at speeds of ∼0.5 to 1.9 × 10⁷ m/s, in response to the injection of negative charge associated with the +CG.

Using visible‐range and infrared (3–5 μm) high‐speed video cameras, we observed luminosity transients that reilluminated decayed branches of two close (2 to 4 km) negative stepped leaders in Florida. Leader branches were energized via stepping at their tips and, as a result, were most heated near their lower ends, with the hotter sections being connected via cooler sections to the trunk. In the modeling of lightning leaders, usually a single tip is considered. In contrast, in the present study, many (up to 30 per major branch) tips were active at the same time, forming a network‐like structure with a descending multitip “ionization front” whose transverse dimensions were of the order of hundreds of meters. The front exhibited alternating stepping, with each step necessarily generating a positive charge wave traveling from the leader tip up along the channel, like a mini return stroke. We inferred that the step‐related waves can cause luminosity transients in the remnants of decayed negative branches at higher altitudes. Such reactivated branches, in turn, may facilitate further leader stepping at lower altitudes, as first reported by Stolzenburg et al. (2015,https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022933). The reactivation process is likely to involve multiple steps, as evidenced by a large number of active tips (some tens per 50‐μs frame) and corresponding electric field pulses occurring at time intervals of 2 μs or less. Additionally, our observations suggest that a transient in one decayed branch can trigger (or assist with triggering of) a transient in another branch.

Using high‐speed video cameras operating with framing rates of 20 and 525 kfps, we imaged the attachment process of a natural negative cloud‐to‐ground flash, occurring at a distance of 490 m. Nine upward leaders were observed. A total of 12 space stems/leaders in 47 steps of the downward negative stepped leader were captured. The two‐dimensional length of them was between 2.0 and 5.9 m, with an average of 3.0 m. The average interstep interval, step length, and two‐dimensional speed of the downward negative leader and that of upward positive leader were statistically analyzed. The last step of the downward negative leader making contact with the upward connecting leader was recorded. The two‐dimensional length of the final imaged gap between the tips of opposite‐polarity leaders was estimated to be about 13 m.

High‐speed video and electric field change data have been used to examine the initiation and propagation of 21 recoil leaders, 7 of which evolved into dart (or dart‐stepped) leaders (DLs) initiating return strokes and 14 were attempted leaders (ALs), in a Canton‐Tower upward flash. Three DLs and two ALs clearly exhibited bidirectional extension. Each DL was preceded by one or more ALs and initiated near the extremity of the positive end of the preceding AL. The positive end of each bidirectional DL generally appeared to be inactive (stationary) or intermittently propagated along the positive part of the preceding AL channel and extended into the virgin air. A sequence of two floating channel segments was formed ahead of the approaching positive end of one DL, causing its abrupt elongation.

An advanced nonlinear and nonuniform distributed circuit (RLCG) model of lightning M‐component has been developed. The model accounts for the variation of the series resistanceRof M‐component channel due to its heating by the transient current and its subsequent cooling, longitudinal voltage drop along the channel due to the background continuing current, ohmic losses in the channel corona sheath (represented by shunt conductanceG), and variation of series inductanceLand shunt capacitanceCof the channel with height above ground. The model was tested against the channel‐base current and corresponding close electric fields measured for seven M‐components in negative lightning triggered using the rocket‐and‐wire technique. Detailed sensitivity analysis was performed for one M‐component. The influences of height‐varying series inductance and shunt capacitance and the length of in‐cloud channel (representing the excitation source) on the computed current and field waveforms were found to be relatively insignificant, while the influences of ohmic losses in the channel corona sheath and voltage drop along the grounded channel were significant. The effects of background continuing current level and grounding resistance were significant for M‐field, but not for M‐current. Model‐predicted overall power and current profiles below the cloud base are consistent with the observed M‐component luminosity profiles and are drastically different from the observed downward leader/upward return stroke profiles. The characteristic feature of M‐components, the time shift between the current onset and close electric field peak (essentially absent for leader/return stroke sequences), was well reproduced by our model.

A positive cloud‐to‐ground (+CG) lightning flash containing a single stroke with a peak current of approximately +310 kA followed by a long continuing current triggered seven upward lightning flashes from tall structures. The flashes were observed on 4 June 2016 at the Tall Object Lightning Observatory in Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China. The optical and electric field characteristics of these flashes were analyzed using synchronized two‐station data from two high‐speed video cameras, one total‐sky lightning channel imager, two lightning channel imagers, and two sets of slow and fast electric field measuring systems. Three upward flashes were initiated sequentially in the field of view of high‐speed video cameras. One of them was initiated approximately 0.35 ms after the return stroke of +CG flash from the Canton Tower, the tallest structure within a 12‐km radius of the +CG flash, while the other two upward flashes were initiated from two other, more distant tall objects, approximately 18 ms after the +CG flash stroke. The initiation of the latter two upward flashes could be caused by the combined effect of the return stroke of +CG flash, its associated continuing current, and K process in the cloud. Each of these three upward flashes contained multiple downward leader/upward return stroke sequences, with the first leader/return stroke sequence of the second and third flashes occurring only after the completion of the last leader/return stroke sequence of the preceding flash. The total number of strokes in the three upward flashes was 13, and they occurred over approximately 1.5 s.