skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Observed and Modeled Mountain Waves from the Surface to the Mesosphere near the Drake Passage
Abstract Four state-of-the-science numerical weather prediction (NWP) models were used to perform mountain wave (MW)-resolving hindcasts over the Drake Passage of a 10-day period in 2010 with numerous observed MW cases. The Integrated Forecast System (IFS) and the Icosahedral Nonhydrostatic (ICON) model were run at Δx≈ 9 and 13 km globally. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model and the Met Office Unified Model (UM) were both configured with a Δx= 3-km regional domain. All domains had tops near 1 Pa (z≈ 80 km). These deep domains allowedquantitativevalidation against Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) observations, accounting for observation time, viewing geometry, and radiative transfer. All models reproduced observed middle-atmosphere MWs with remarkable skill. Increased horizontal resolution improved validations. Still, all models underrepresented observed MW amplitudes, even after accounting for model effective resolution and instrument noise, suggesting even at Δx≈ 3-km resolution, small-scale MWs are underresolved and/or overdiffused. MW drag parameterizations are still necessary in NWP models at current operational resolutions of Δx≈ 10 km. Upper GW sponge layers in the operationally configured models significantly, artificially reduced MW amplitudes in the upper stratosphere and mesosphere. In the IFS, parameterized GW drags partly compensated this deficiency, but still, total drags were ≈6 times smaller than that resolved at Δx≈ 3 km. Meridionally propagating MWs significantly enhance zonal drag over the Drake Passage. Interestingly, drag associated with meridional fluxes of zonal momentum (i.e.,) were important; not accounting for these terms results in a drag in the wrong direction at and below the polar night jet. Significance StatementThis study had three purposes: to quantitatively evaluate how well four state-of-the-science weather models could reproduce observed mountain waves (MWs) in the middle atmosphere, to compare the simulated MWs within the models, and to quantitatively evaluate two MW parameterizations in a widely used climate model. These models reproduced observed MWs with remarkable skill. Still, MW parameterizations are necessary in current Δx≈ 10-km resolution global weather models. Even Δx≈ 3-km resolution does not appear to be high enough to represent all momentum-fluxing MW scales. Meridionally propagating MWs can significantly influence zonal winds over the Drake Passage. Parameterizations that handle horizontal propagation may need to consider horizontal fluxes of horizontal momentum in order to get the direction of their forcing correct.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2004512
PAR ID:
10367816
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
American Meteorological Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
Volume:
79
Issue:
4
ISSN:
0022-4928
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 909-932
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences)
    null (Ed.)
    Abstract This paper addresses the compressible nonlinear dynamics accompanying increasing mountain wave (MW) forcing over the southern Andes and propagation into the mesosphere and lower thermosphere (MLT) under winter conditions. A stretched grid provides very high resolution of the MW dynamics in a large computational domain. A slow increase of cross-mountain winds enables MWs to initially break in the mesosphere and extend to lower and higher altitudes thereafter. MW structure and breaking is strongly modulated by static mean and semidiurnal tide fields exhibiting a critical level at ~114 km for zonal MW propagation. Varying vertical group velocities for different zonal wavelengths λ x yield initial breaking in the lee of the major Andes peaks for λ x ~ 50 km, and extending significantly upstream for larger λ x approaching the critical level at later times. The localized extent of the Andes terrain in latitude leads to “ship wave” responses above the individual peaks at earlier times, and a much larger ship-wave response at 100 km and above as the larger-scale MWs achieve large amplitudes. Other responses above regions of MW breaking include large-scale secondary gravity waves and acoustic waves that achieve very large amplitudes extending well into the thermosphere. MW breaking also causes momentum deposition that yields local decelerations initially, which merge and extend horizontally thereafter and persist throughout the event. Companion papers examine the associated momentum fluxes, mean-flow evolution, gravity wave–tidal interactions, and the MW instability dynamics and sources of secondary gravity waves and acoustic waves. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems)
    Abstract Atmospheric gravity waves (GWs) span a broad range of length scales. As a result, the un‐resolved and under‐resolved GWs have to be represented using a sub‐grid scale (SGS) parameterization in general circulation models (GCMs). In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques have emerged as novel methods for SGS modeling of climate processes. In the widely used approach of supervised (offline) learning, the true representation of the SGS terms have to be properly extracted from high‐fidelity data (e.g., GW‐resolving simulations). However, this is a non‐trivial task, and the quality of the ML‐based parameterization significantly hinges on the quality of these SGS terms. Here, we compare three methods to extract 3D GW fluxes and the resulting drag (Gravity Wave Drag [GWD]) from high‐resolution simulations: Helmholtz decomposition, and spatial filtering to compute the Reynolds stress and the full SGS stress. In addition to previous studies that focused only on vertical fluxes by GWs, we also quantify the SGS GWD due to lateral momentum fluxes. We build and utilize a library of tropical high‐resolution (Δx = 3 km) simulations using weather research and forecasting model. Results show that the SGS lateral momentum fluxes could have a significant contribution to the total GWD. Moreover, when estimating GWD due to lateral effects, interactions between the SGS and the resolved large‐scale flow need to be considered. The sensitivity of the results to different filter type and length scale (dependent on GCM resolution) is also explored to inform the scale‐awareness in the development of data‐driven parameterizations. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; (, Weather and Forecasting)
    Abstract Pure artificial intelligence (AI)-based weather prediction (AIWP) models have made waves within the scientific community and the media, claiming superior performance to numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. However, these models often lack impactful output variables such as precipitation. One exception is Google DeepMind’s GraphCast model, which became the first mainstream AIWP model to predict precipitation, but performed only limited verification. We present an analysis of the ECMWF’s Integrated Forecasting System (IFS)-initialized (GRAPIFS) and the NCEP’s Global Forecast System (GFS)-initialized (GRAPGFS) GraphCast precipitation forecasts over the contiguous United States and compare to results from the GFS and IFS models using 1) grid-based, 2) neighborhood, and 3) object-oriented metrics verified against the fifth major global reanalysis produced by ECMWF (ERA5) and the NCEP/Environmental Modeling Center (EMC) stage IV precipitation analysis datasets. We affirmed that GRAPGFSand GRAPIFSperform better than the GFS and IFS in terms of root-mean-square error and stable equitable errors in probability space, but the GFS and IFS precipitation distributions more closely align with the ERA5 and stage IV distributions. Equitable threat score also generally favored GraphCast, particularly for lower accumulation thresholds. Fractions skill score for increasing neighborhood sizes shows greater gains for the GFS and IFS than GraphCast, suggesting the NWP models may have a better handle on intensity but struggle with the location. Object-based verification for GraphCast found positive area biases at low accumulation thresholds and large negative biases at high accumulation thresholds. GRAPGFSsaw similar performance gains to GRAPIFSwhen compared to their NWP counterparts, but initializing with the less familiar GFS conditions appeared to lead to an increase in light precipitation. Significance StatementPure artificial intelligence (AI)-based weather prediction (AIWP) has exploded in popularity with promises of better performance and faster run times than numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. However, less attention has been paid to their capability to predict impactful, sensible weather like precipitation, precipitation type, or specific meteorological features. We seek to address this gap by comparing precipitation forecast performance by an AI model called GraphCast to the Global Forecast System (GFS) and the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) NWP models. While GraphCast does perform better on many verification metrics, it has some limitations for intense precipitation forecasts. In particular, it less frequently predicts intense precipitation events than the GFS or IFS. Overall, this article emphasizes the promise of AIWP while at the same time stresses the need for robust verification by domain experts. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences)
    Abstract Based on 20-day control forecasts by the 9-km Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for selected periods of summer and winter events, this study investigates global distributions of gravity wave momentum fluxes resolved by the highest-resolution-ever global operational numerical weather prediction model. Two supplementary datasets, including 18-km ECMWF IFS experiments and the 30-km ERA5, are included for comparison. In the stratosphere, there is a clear dominance of westward momentum fluxes over the winter extratropics with strong baroclinic instability, while eastward momentum fluxes are found in the summer tropics. However, meridional momentum fluxes, locally as important as the above zonal counterpart, show different behaviors of global distribution characteristics, with northward and southward momentum fluxes alternating with each other especially at lower altitudes. Both events illustrate conclusive evidence that stronger stratospheric fluxes are found in the ECMWF forecast with finer resolution, and that ERA5 datasets have the weakest signals in general, regardless of whether regridding is applied. In the troposphere, probability distributions of vertical motion perturbations are highly asymmetric with more strong positive signals especially over latitudes covering heavy rainfall, likely caused by convective forcing. With the aid of precipitation accumulation, a simple filtering method is proposed in an attempt to eliminate those tropospheric asymmetries by convective forcing, before calculating tropospheric wave-induced fluxes. Furthermore, this research demonstrates promising findings that the proposed filtering method could help in reducing the potential uncertainties with respect to estimating tropospheric wave-induced fluxes. Finally, absolute momentum flux distributions with proposed approaches are presented, for further assessment in the future. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, 104th AMS Annual Meeting)
    Rotation in hurricane flows can highly affect the dynamics and structure of hurricane boundary layers (HBLs). Recent studies (Momen et al. 2021) showed that there is a significant distinction between turbulence characteristics in hurricane and regular atmospheric boundary layers due to the strong rotational effects of hurricane flows. Despite these unique features of HBLs, the current planetary boundary layer (PBL) and turbulence schemes in numerical weather prediction (NWP) models are neither specifically designed nor comprehensively tested for major hurricane flows. In this talk, we will address this knowledge gap by characterizing the role of horizontal and vertical eddy diffusion under different PBL schemes in simulated hurricane intensity, size, and track. To this end, the results of multiple simulated hurricane cases will be presented using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The impacts of changing the grid resolution, horizontal turbulence, PBL scheme, vertical eddy diffusivity, and PBL height on hurricane dynamics and accuracy will be characterized. The results indicate that the current turbulence and PBL schemes in WRF are overly diffusive for simulating major hurricanes (Romdhani et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023) primarily since they do not account for turbulence suppression effects in rotating hurricane flows. We will also show new suites of simulations in which the default horizontal and vertical diffusion in WRF are modulated to determine the impacts of eddy diffusion changes on hurricane dynamics. The results indicate that reducing the default vertical diffusion depth and magnitude led to ~38% and ~24% improvements, on average, in hurricane intensity forecasts compared to the default models in the considered cases (Matak and Momen 2023). Moreover, by decreasing the default horizontal mixing length, we managed to decrease the intensity errors on average between ~8-23% in the WRF’s default models for both low and high resolutions. Figure A displays an example of the simulations in which our new adjustment of the vertical diffusion (reduced diffusion, blue line) agrees better with the observed data (black line) compared to the default WRF results (gray line). The figure also depicts wind speed contours that how this change in vertical diffusion can remarkably influence the structure, size, and intensity of hurricane simulations. The results of this study provide notable insights into the role of turbulent fluxes in simulated hurricanes that can be useful to advance the turbulence and PBL parameterizations of NWP models for accurate tropical cyclone forecasts. References: Li M, Zhang JA, Matak L, Momen M (2023) The impacts of adjusting momentum roughness length on strong and weak hurricanes forecasts: a comprehensive analysis of weather simulations and observations. Mon Weather Rev. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-22-0191.1 Matak L, Momen M (2023) The role of vertical diffusion parameterizations in the dynamics and accuracy of simulated intensifying hurricanes . Boundary Layer Meteorology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-023-00818-w Momen M, Parlange MB, Giometto MG (2021) Scrambling and reorientation of classical boundary layer turbulence in hurricane winds. Geophys Res Lett 48:.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL091695 Romdhani O, Zhang JA, Momen M (2022) Characterizing the impacts of turbulence closures on real hurricane forecasts: A comprehensive joint assessment of grid resolution, horizontal turbulence models, and horizontal mixing length. J Adv Model Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021MS002796 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email