skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: TLSL e AF: automatic leaf angle estimates from single‐scan terrestrial laser scanning
Summary Leaf angle distribution (LAD) in forest canopies affects estimates of leaf area, light interception, and global‐scale photosynthesis, but is often simplified to a single theoretical value. Here, we present TLSLeAF (Terrestrial Laser Scanning Leaf Angle Function), an automated open‐source method of deriving LADs from terrestrial laser scanning.TLSLeAF produces canopy‐scale leaf angle and LADs by relying on gridded laser scanning data. The approach increases processing speed, improves angle estimates, and requires minimal user input. Key features are automation, leaf–wood classification, beta parameter output, and implementation in R to increase accessibility for the ecology community.TLSLeAF precisely estimates leaf angle with minimal distance effects on angular estimates while rapidly producing LADs on a consumer‐grade machine. We challenge the popular spherical LAD assumption, showing sensitivity to ecosystem type in plant area index and foliage profile estimates that translate toc. 25% andc. 11% increases in canopy net photosynthesis (c. 25%) and solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (c. 11%).TLSLeAF can now be applied to the vast catalog of laser scanning data already available from ecosystems around the globe. The ease of use will enable widespread adoption of the method outside of remote‐sensing experts, allowing greater accessibility for addressing ecological hypotheses and large‐scale ecosystem modeling efforts.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2005574
PAR ID:
10375264
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
New Phytologist
Volume:
232
Issue:
4
ISSN:
0028-646X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 1876-1892
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Summary Grasses are exceptionally productive, yet their hydraulic adaptation is paradoxical. Among C3grasses, a high photosynthetic rate (Aarea) may depend on higher vein density (Dv) and hydraulic conductance (Kleaf). However, the higherDvof C4grasses suggests a hydraulic surplus, given their reduced need for highKleafresulting from lower stomatal conductance (gs).Combining hydraulic and photosynthetic physiological data for diverse common garden C3and C4species with data for 332 species from the published literature, and mechanistic modeling, we validated a framework for linkages of photosynthesis with hydraulic transport, anatomy, and adaptation to aridity.C3and C4grasses had similarKleafin our common garden, but C4grasses had higherKleafthan C3species in our meta‐analysis. Variation inKleafdepended on outside‐xylem pathways. C4grasses have highKleaf : gs, which modeling shows is essential to achieve their photosynthetic advantage.Across C3grasses, higherAareawas associated with higherKleaf, and adaptation to aridity, whereas for C4species, adaptation to aridity was associated with higherKleaf : gs. These associations are consistent with adaptation for stress avoidance.Hydraulic traits are a critical element of evolutionary and ecological success in C3and C4grasses and are crucial avenues for crop design and ecological forecasting. 
    more » « less
  2. Summary Photosynthetic capacity per unit irradiance is greater, and the marginal carbon revenue of water (∂A/∂E) is smaller, in shaded leaves than sunlit leaves, apparently contradicting optimization theory. I tested the hypothesis that these patterns arise from optimal carbon partitioning subject to biophysical constraints on leaf water potential.In a whole plant model with two canopy modules, I adjusted carbon partitioning, nitrogen partitioning and leaf water potential to maximize carbon profit or canopy photosynthesis, and recorded how gas exchange parameters compared between shaded and sunlit modules in the optimum.The model predicted that photosynthetic capacity per unit irradiance should be larger, and ∂A/∂Esmaller, in shaded modules compared to sunlit modules. This was attributable partly to radiation‐driven differences in evaporative demand, and partly to differences in hydraulic conductance arising from the need to balance marginal returns on stem carbon investment between modules. The model verified, however, that invariance in the marginal carbon revenue of N (∂A/∂N) is in fact optimal.The Cowan–Farquhar optimality solution (invariance of ∂A/∂E) does not apply to spatial variation within a canopy. The resulting variation in carbon–water economy explains differences in capacity per unit irradiance, reconciling optimization theory with observations. 
    more » « less
  3. Summary Leaf dark respiration (Rd) acclimates to environmental changes. However, the magnitude, controls and time scales of acclimation remain unclear and are inconsistently treated in ecosystem models.We hypothesized thatRdand Rubisco carboxylation capacity (Vcmax) at 25°C (Rd,25,Vcmax,25) are coordinated so thatRd,25variations supportVcmax,25at a level allowing full light use, withVcmax,25reflecting daytime conditions (for photosynthesis), andRd,25/Vcmax,25reflecting night‐time conditions (for starch degradation and sucrose export). We tested this hypothesis temporally using a 5‐yr warming experiment, and spatially using an extensive field‐measurement data set. We compared the results to three published alternatives:Rd,25declines linearly with daily average prior temperature;Rdat average prior night temperatures tends towards a constant value; andRd,25/Vcmax,25is constant.Our hypothesis accounted for more variation in observedRd,25over time (R2 = 0.74) and space (R2 = 0.68) than the alternatives. Night‐time temperature dominated the seasonal time‐course ofRd, with an apparent response time scale ofc.2 wk.Vcmaxdominated the spatial patterns.Our acclimation hypothesis results in a smaller increase in globalRdin response to rising CO2and warming than is projected by the two of three alternative hypotheses, and by current models. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Given the current rates of climate change, with associated shifts in herbivore population densities, understanding the role of different herbivores in ecosystem functioning is critical for predicting ecosystem responses. Here, we examined how migratory geese and resident, non‐migratory reindeer—two dominating yet functionally contrasting herbivores—control vegetation and ecosystem processes in rapidly warming Arctic tundra.We collected vegetation and ecosystem carbon (C) flux data at peak plant growing season in the two longest running, fully replicated herbivore removal experiments found in high‐Arctic Svalbard. Experiments had been set up independently in wet habitat utilised by barnacle geeseBranta leucopsisin summer and in moist‐to‐dry habitat utilised by wild reindeerRangifer tarandus platyrhynchusyear‐round.Excluding geese induced vegetation state transitions from heavily grazed, moss‐dominated (only 4 g m−2of live above‐ground vascular plant biomass) to ungrazed, graminoid‐dominated (60 g m−2after 4‐year exclusion) and horsetail‐dominated (150 g m−2after 15‐year exclusion) tundra. This caused large increases in vegetation C and nitrogen (N) pools, dead biomass and moss‐layer depth. Alterations in plant N concentration and CN ratio suggest overall slower plant community nutrient dynamics in the short‐term (4‐year) absence of geese. Long‐term (15‐year) goose removal quadrupled net ecosystem C sequestration (NEE) by increasing ecosystem photosynthesis more than ecosystem respiration (ER).Excluding reindeer for 21 years also produced detectable increases in live above‐ground vascular plant biomass (from 50 to 80 g m−2; without promoting vegetation state shifts), as well as in vegetation C and N pools, dead biomass, moss‐layer depth and ER. Yet, reindeer removal did not alter the chemistry of plants and soil or NEE.Synthesis. Although both herbivores were key drivers of ecosystem structure and function, the control exerted by geese in their main habitat (wet tundra) was much more pronounced than that exerted by reindeer in their main habitat (moist‐to‐dry tundra). Importantly, these herbivore effects are scale dependent, because geese are more spatially concentrated and thereby affect a smaller portion of the tundra landscape compared to reindeer. Our results highlight the substantial heterogeneity in how herbivores shape tundra vegetation and ecosystem processes, with implications for ongoing environmental change. 
    more » « less
  5. Summary High concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon in stems of herbaceous and woody C3plants exit leaves in the dark. In the light, C3species use a small portion of xylem‐transported CO2for leaf photosynthesis. However, it is not known if xylem‐transported CO2will exit leaves in the dark or be used for photosynthesis in the light in Kranz‐type C4plants.Cut leaves ofAmaranthus hypochondriacuswere placed in one of three solutions of [NaH13CO3] dissolved in KCl water to measure the efflux of xylem‐transported CO2exiting the leaf in the dark or rates of assimilation of xylem‐transported CO2* in the light, in real‐time, using a tunable diode laser absorption spectroscope.In the dark, the efflux of xylem‐transported CO2increased with increasing rates of transpiration and [13CO2*]; however, rates of13CeffluxinA. hypochondriacuswere lower compared to C3species. In the light,A. hypochondriacusfixed nearly 75% of the xylem‐transported CO2supplied to the leaf.Kranz anatomy and biochemistry likely influence the efflux of xylem‐transported CO2out of cut leaves ofA. hypochondriacusin the dark, as well as the use of xylem‐transported CO2* for photosynthesis in the light. Thus increasing the carbon use efficiency of Kranz‐type C4species over C3species. 
    more » « less