More Like this

1. Interpretable Active Learning

   Phillips, Richard; Chang, Kyu Hyun; Friedler, Sorelle A. (January 2018, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency)

   Active learning has long been a topic of study in machine learning. However, as increasingly complex and opaque models have become standard practice, the process of active learning, too, has become more opaque. There has been little investigation into interpreting what specific trends and patterns an active learning strategy may be exploring. This work expands on the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations framework (LIME) to provide explanations for active learning recommendations. We demonstrate how LIME can be used to generate locally faithful explanations for an active learning strategy, and how these explanations can be used to understand how different models and datasets explore a problem space over time. In order to quantify the per-subgroup differences in how an active learning strategy queries spatial regions, we introduce a notion of uncertainty bias (based on disparate impact) to measure the discrepancy in the confidence for a model's predictions between one subgroup and another. Using the uncertainty bias measure, we show that our query explanations accurately reflect the subgroup focus of the active learning queries, allowing for an interpretable explanation of what is being learned as points with similar sources of uncertainty have their uncertainty bias resolved. We demonstrate that this technique can be applied to track uncertainty bias over user-defined clusters or automatically generated clusters based on the source of uncertainty. 

   more » « less
2. Revisiting Local Neighborhood Methods in Machine Learning

   https://doi.org/10.1109/DSLW51110.2021.9523409  

   Shekkizhar, Sarath; Ortega, Antonio (June 2021, 2021 IEEE Data Science and Learning Workshop (DSLW))

   Several machine learning methods leverage the idea of locality by using k-nearest neighbor (KNN) techniques to design better pattern recognition models. However, the choice of KNN parameters such as k is often made experimentally, e.g., via cross-validation, leading to local neighborhoods without a clear geometric interpretation. In this paper, we replace KNN with our recently introduced polytope neighborhood scheme - Non Negative Kernel regression (NNK). NNK formulates neighborhood selection as a sparse signal approximation problem and is adaptive to the local distribution of samples in the neighborhood of the data point of interest. We analyze the benefits of local neighborhood construction based on NNK. In particular, we study the generalization properties of local interpolation using NNK and present data dependent bounds in the non asymptotic setting. The applicability of NNK in transductive few shot learning setting and for measuring distance between two datasets is demonstrated. NNK exhibits robust, superior performance in comparison to standard locally weighted neighborhood methods. 

   more » « less
3. Provably efficient, succinct, and precise explanations

   Blanc, G.; Lange, J.; Tan, L. (January 2021, Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2021))

   We consider the problem of explaining the predictions of an arbitrary blackbox model f: given query access to f and an instance x, output a small set of x's features that in conjunction essentially determines f(x). We design an efficient algorithm with provable guarantees on the succinctness and precision of the explanations that it returns. Prior algorithms were either efficient but lacked such guarantees, or achieved such guarantees but were inefficient. We obtain our algorithm via a connection to the problem of {\sl implicitly} learning decision trees. The implicit nature of this learning task allows for efficient algorithms even when the complexity of~f necessitates an intractably large surrogate decision tree. We solve the implicit learning problem by bringing together techniques from learning theory, local computation algorithms, and complexity theory. Our approach of “explaining by implicit learning” shares elements of two previously disparate methods for post-hoc explanations, global and local explanations, and we make the case that it enjoys advantages of both. 

   more » « less
4. Interpretable Active Learning

   Phillips, Richard; Chang, Kyu Hyun; Friedler, Sorelle A. (January 2018, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency)

   Active learning has long been a topic of study in machine learning. However, as increasingly complex and opaque models have become standard practice, the process of active learning, too, has become more opaque. There has been little investigation into interpreting what specific trends and patterns an active learning strategy may be exploring. This work expands on the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations framework (LIME) to provide explanations for active learning recommendations. We demonstrate how LIME can be used to generate locally faithful explanations for an active learning strategy, and how these explanations can be used to understand how different models and datasets explore a problem space over time. These explanations can also be used to generate batches based on common sources of uncertainty. These regions of common uncertainty can be useful for understanding a model’s current weaknesses. In order to quantify the per-subgroup differences in how an active learning strategy queries spatial regions, we introduce a notion of uncertainty bias (based on disparate impact) to measure the discrepancy in the confidence for a model’s predictions between one subgroup and another. Using the uncertainty bias measure, we show that our query explanations accurately reflect the subgroup focus of the active learning queries, allowing for an interpretable explanation of what is being learned as points with similar sources of uncertainty have their uncertainty bias resolved. We demonstrate that this technique can be applied to track uncertainty bias over user-defined clusters or automatically generated clusters based on the source of uncertainty. We also measure how the choice of initial labeled examples effects groups over time. 

   more » « less
5. Domain Generalization by Marginal Transfer Learning

   Blanchard, Gilles; Deshmukh, Aniket Anand; Dogan, Urun; Lee, Gyemin; Scott, Clayton (January 2021, Journal of machine learning research)

   null (Ed.)

   In the problem of domain generalization (DG), there are labeled training data sets from several related prediction problems, and the goal is to make accurate predictions on future unlabeled data sets that are not known to the learner. This problem arises in several applications where data distributions fluctuate because of environmental, technical, or other sources of variation. We introduce a formal framework for DG, and argue that it can be viewed as a kind of supervised learning problem by augmenting the original feature space with the marginal distribution of feature vectors. While our framework has several connections to conventional analysis of supervised learning algorithms, several unique aspects of DG require new methods of analysis. This work lays the learning theoretic foundations of domain generalization, building on our earlier conference paper where the problem of DG was introduced (Blanchard et al., 2011). We present two formal models of data generation, corresponding notions of risk, and distribution-free generalization error analysis. By focusing our attention on kernel methods, we also provide more quantitative results and a universally consistent algorithm. An efficient implementation is provided for this algorithm, which is experimentally compared to a pooling strategy on one synthetic and three real-world data sets. Keywords: domain generalization, generalization error bounds, Rademacher complexity, kernel methods, universal consistency, kernel approximation 

   more » « less