An official website of the United States government
Measuring the chemical traits of leaf litter is important for understanding plants’ influence on nutrient cycles, including through nutrient resorption and litter decomposition, but conventional leaf trait measurements are often destructive and labor-intensive. Here, we develop and evaluate the performance of partial least-squares regression models that use reflectance spectra of intact or ground leaves to estimate leaf litter traits, including carbon and nitrogen concentration, carbon fractions, and leaf mass per area (LMA). Our analyses included more than 300 samples of senesced foliage from 11 species of temperate trees, including both needleleaf and broadleaf species. Across all samples, we could predict each trait with moderate-to-high accuracy from both intact-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.543–0.941; %root mean squared error (RMSE) = 7.49–18.5) and ground-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.491–0.946; %RMSE = 7.00–19.5). Notably, intact-leaf spectra yielded better predictions of LMA. Our results support the feasibility of building models to estimate multiple chemical traits from leaf litter of a range of species. In particular, intact-leaf spectral models allow non-destructive trait estimation in a matter of seconds, which could enable researchers to measure the same leaves over time in studies of nutrient resorption.
more »
« less
Reflectance spectroscopy allows rapid, accurate and non‐destructive estimates of functional traits from pressed leaves
More than ever, ecologists seek to employ herbarium collections to estimate plant functional traits from the past and across biomes. However, many trait measurements are destructive, which may preclude their use on valuable specimens. Researchers increasingly use reflectance spectroscopy to estimate traits from fresh or ground leaves, and to delimit or identify taxa. Here, we extend this body of work to non-destructive measurements on pressed, intact leaves, like those in herbarium collections. Using 618 samples from 68 species, we used partial least-squares regression to build models linking pressed-leaf reflectance spectra to a broad suite of traits, including leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), equivalent water thickness, carbon fractions, pigments, and twelve elements. We compared these models to those trained on fresh- or ground-leaf spectra of the same samples. The traits our pressed-leaf models could estimate best were LMA (R2 = 0.932; %RMSE = 6.56), C (R2 = 0.855; %RMSE = 9.03), and cellulose (R2 = 0.803; %RMSE = 12.2), followed by water-related traits, certain nutrients (Ca, Mg, N, and P), other carbon fractions, and pigments (all R2 = 0.514–0.790; %RMSE = 12.8–19.6). Remaining elements were predicted poorly (R2 < 0.5, %RMSE > 20). For most chemical traits, pressed-leaf models performed better than fresh-leaf models, but worse than ground-leaf models. Pressed-leaf models were worse than fresh-leaf models for estimating LMA and LDMC, but better than ground-leaf models for LMA. Finally, in a subset of samples, we used partial least-squares discriminant analysis to classify specimens among 10 species with near-perfect accuracy (>97%) from pressed- and ground-leaf spectra, and slightly lower accuracy (>93%) from fresh-leaf spectra. These results show that applying spectroscopy to pressed leaves is a promising way to estimate leaf functional traits and identify species without destructive analysis. Pressed-leaf spectra might combine advantages of fresh and ground leaves: like fresh leaves, they retain some of the spectral expression of leaf structure; but like ground leaves, they circumvent the masking effect of water absorption. Our study has far-reaching implications for capturing the wide range of functional and taxonomic information in the world’s preserved plant collections.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1831944
- PAR ID:
- 10379627
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- Volume:
- 0
- Issue:
- 0
- ISSN:
- 2041-210X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-17
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Summary Leaf mass per area (LMA) is a key plant trait, reflecting tradeoffs between leaf photosynthetic function, longevity, and structural investment. Capturing spatial and temporal variability in LMA has been a long‐standing goal of ecological research and is an essential component for advancing Earth system models. Despite the substantial variation in LMA within and across Earth's biomes, an efficient, globally generalizable approach to predict LMA is still lacking.We explored the capacity to predict LMA from leaf spectra across much of the global LMA trait space, with values ranging from 17 to 393 g m−2. Our dataset contained leaves from a wide range of biomes from the high Arctic to the tropics, included broad‐ and needleleaf species, and upper‐ and lower‐canopy (i.e. sun and shade) growth environments.Here we demonstrate the capacity to rapidly estimate LMA using only spectral measurements across a wide range of species, leaf age and canopy position from diverse biomes. Our model captures LMA variability with high accuracy and low error (R2 = 0.89; root mean square error (RMSE) = 15.45 g m−2).Our finding highlights the fact that the leaf economics spectrum is mirrored by the leaf optical spectrum, paving the way for this technology to predict the diversity of LMA in ecosystems across global biomes.more » « less
-
Plant traits are often measured in the field or laboratory to characterize stress responses. However, direct measurements are not always cost effective for broader sampling efforts, whereas indirect approaches such as reflectance spectroscopy could offer efficient and scalable alternatives. Here, we used field spectroscopy to assess whether (1) existing vegetation indices could predict leaf trait responses to heat stress, or if (2) partial least squares regression (PLSR) spectral models could quantify these trait responses. On several warm, sunny days, we measured leaf trait responses indicative of photosynthetic mechanisms, plant water status, and morphology, including electron transport rate (ETR), photochemical quenching (qP), leaf water potential (Ψleaf), and specific leaf area (SLA) in 51 urban trees from nine species. Concurrent measures of hyperspectral leaf reflectance from the same individuals were used to calculate vegetation indices for correlation with trait responses. We found that vegetation indices predicted only SLA robustly (R2 = 0.55), while PLSR predicted all leaf trait responses of interest with modest success (R2 = 0.36 to 0.58). Using spectral band subsets corresponding to commercially available drone-mounted hyperspectral cameras, as well as those selected for use in common multispectral satellite missions, we were able to estimate ETR, qP, and SLA with reasonable accuracy, highlighting the potential for large-scale prediction of these parameters. Overall, reflectance spectroscopy and PLSR can identify wavelengths and wavelength ranges that are important for remote sensing-based modeling of important functional trait responses of trees to heat stress over broad ranges.more » « less
-
Recently, solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is a promising tool to estimate gross primary production (GPP). Photosynthesis gradually saturates with the increasing light, but fluorescence tends to keep increasing, leading to a nonlinear SIF-GPP relationship. This nonlinearity occurs for sunlit leaves but not for shaded leaves for which photosynthesis is light-limited. However, the separation of sunlit and shaded SIF has not been systematically investigated when estimating GPP from SIF. Therefore, it is promising to develop a model for GPP estimation considering such differences. This study proposed an approach to separate the total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal) from TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) SIF into their sunlit and shaded components (SIFsun and SIFshade). The nonlinearity and linearity in SIF-GPP relationships for sunlit and shaded leaves were incorporated into a two-leaf hybrid model, which was fitted using flux tower data and then evaluated using leave-one-site-out crossing validation. We also elucidated the distinct SIF-GPP relationships between sunlit and shaded leaves using the Soil-Canopy-Observation of Photosynthesis and the Energy balance (SCOPE) model simulation. Compared to previously used linear (R2 = 0.68, RMSE = 2.13 gC⋅m^-2*d^-1) or hyperbolic (R2 = 0.72, RMSE = 2.01 gC⋅m^-2⋅d^-1) model based on the big-leaf assumption, our proposed two-leaf hybrid model has the best performance on GPP estimation (R2 = 0.77, RMSE = 1.79 gC⋅m^-2⋅d^-1). We also applied this two-leaf hybrid model to estimate the global GPP during the main growing season in Northern Hemisphere, which were highly correlated with several existing GPP products, with R2 ranging from 0.79 to 0.88. These results will improve our understanding of the relationship between SIF and GPP for sunlit and shaded leaves and will advance application of satellite SIF data to GPP estimation.more » « less
-
Elizabeth Borer (Ed.)Understanding spatial and temporal variation in plant traits is needed to accurately predict how communities and ecosystems will respond to global change. The National Ecological Observatory Network’s (NEON’s) Airborne Observation Platform (AOP) provides hyperspectral images and associated data products at numerous field sites at 1 m spatial resolution, potentially allowing high-resolution trait mapping. We tested the accuracy of readily available data products of NEON’s AOP, such as Leaf Area Index (LAI), Total Biomass, Ecosystem Structure (Canopy height model [CHM]), and Canopy Nitrogen, by comparing them to spatially extensive field measurements from a mesic tallgrass prairie. Correlations with AOP data products exhibited generally weak or no relationships with corresponding field measurements. The strongest relationships were between AOP LAI and ground-measured LAI (r = 0.32) and AOP Total Biomass and ground-measured biomass (r = 0.23). We also examined how well the full reflectance spectra (380–2,500 nm), as opposed to derived products, could predict vegetation traits using partial least-squares regression (PLSR) models. Among all the eight traits examined, only Nitrogen had a validation of more than 0.25. For all vegetation traits, validation ranged from 0.08 to 0.29 and the range of the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) was 14–64%. Our results suggest that currently available AOP-derived data products should not be used without extensive ground-based validation. Relationships using the full reflectance spectra may be more promising, although careful consideration of field and AOP data mismatches in space and/or time, biases in field-based measurements or AOP algorithms, and model uncertainty are needed. Finally, grassland sites may be especially challenging for airborne spectroscopy because of their high species diversity within a small area, mixed functional types of plant communities, and heterogeneous mosaics of disturbance and resource availability. Remote sensing observations are one of the most promising approaches to understanding ecological patterns across space and time. But the opportunity to engage a diverse community of NEON data users will depend on establishing rigorous links with in-situ field measurements across a diversity of sites.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13958
