Attention:NSF PAR will be unavailable due to scheduled facility maintenance July 10th, 5 PM EDT through July 13th. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Reflectance spectroscopy allows rapid, accurate and non‐destructive estimates of functional traits from pressed leaves
Title: Reflectance spectroscopy allows rapid, accurate and non‐destructive estimates of functional traits from pressed leaves
More than ever, ecologists seek to employ herbarium collections to estimate plant functional traits from the past and across biomes. However, many trait measurements are destructive, which may preclude their use on valuable specimens. Researchers increasingly use reflectance spectroscopy to estimate traits from fresh or ground leaves, and to delimit or identify taxa. Here, we extend this body of work to non-destructive measurements on pressed, intact leaves, like those in herbarium collections. Using 618 samples from 68 species, we used partial least-squares regression to build models linking pressed-leaf reflectance spectra to a broad suite of traits, including leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), equivalent water thickness, carbon fractions, pigments, and twelve elements. We compared these models to those trained on fresh- or ground-leaf spectra of the same samples. The traits our pressed-leaf models could estimate best were LMA (R2 = 0.932; %RMSE = 6.56), C (R2 = 0.855; %RMSE = 9.03), and cellulose (R2 = 0.803; %RMSE = 12.2), followed by water-related traits, certain nutrients (Ca, Mg, N, and P), other carbon fractions, and pigments (all R2 = 0.514–0.790; %RMSE = 12.8–19.6). Remaining elements were predicted poorly (R2 < 0.5, %RMSE > 20). For most chemical traits, pressed-leaf models performed better than fresh-leaf models, but worse than ground-leaf models. Pressed-leaf models were worse than fresh-leaf models for estimating LMA and LDMC, but better than ground-leaf models for LMA. Finally, in a subset of samples, we used partial least-squares discriminant analysis to classify specimens among 10 species with near-perfect accuracy (>97%) from pressed- and ground-leaf spectra, and slightly lower accuracy (>93%) from fresh-leaf spectra. These results show that applying spectroscopy to pressed leaves is a promising way to estimate leaf functional traits and identify species without destructive analysis. Pressed-leaf spectra might combine advantages of fresh and ground leaves: like fresh leaves, they retain some of the spectral expression of leaf structure; but like ground leaves, they circumvent the masking effect of water absorption. Our study has far-reaching implications for capturing the wide range of functional and taxonomic information in the world’s preserved plant collections.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1831944
PAR ID:
10379627
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Volume:
0
Issue:
0
ISSN:
2041-210X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1-17
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Canadian Journal of Forest Research)
    Measuring the chemical traits of leaf litter is important for understanding plants’ influence on nutrient cycles, including through nutrient resorption and litter decomposition, but conventional leaf trait measurements are often destructive and labor-intensive. Here, we develop and evaluate the performance of partial least-squares regression models that use reflectance spectra of intact or ground leaves to estimate leaf litter traits, including carbon and nitrogen concentration, carbon fractions, and leaf mass per area (LMA). Our analyses included more than 300 samples of senesced foliage from 11 species of temperate trees, including both needleleaf and broadleaf species. Across all samples, we could predict each trait with moderate-to-high accuracy from both intact-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.543–0.941; %root mean squared error (RMSE) = 7.49–18.5) and ground-leaf litter spectra (validation R2 = 0.491–0.946; %RMSE = 7.00–19.5). Notably, intact-leaf spectra yielded better predictions of LMA. Our results support the feasibility of building models to estimate multiple chemical traits from leaf litter of a range of species. In particular, intact-leaf spectral models allow non-destructive trait estimation in a matter of seconds, which could enable researchers to measure the same leaves over time in studies of nutrient resorption. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, New Phytologist)
    Summary Reflectance spectroscopy is a rapid method for estimating traits and discriminating species. Spectral libraries from herbarium specimens represent an untapped resource for generating broad phenomic datasets across space, time, and taxa.We conducted a proof‐of‐concept study using trait data and spectra from herbarium specimens up to 179 yr old, alongside data from recently dried and pressed leaves. We validated model accuracy and transferability for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination.Trait models from herbarium spectra predicted leaf mass per area (LMA) withR2 = 0.94 and %RMSE = 4.86%. Models for LMA prediction were transferable between herbarium and pressed spectra, achievingR2 = 0.88, %RMSE = 8.76% for herbarium to pressed spectra, andR2 = 0.76, %RMSE = 10.5% for the reverse transfer. Discriminant models classified leaf spectra from 25 species with 74% accuracy, and classification probabilities were significantly associated with several herbarium specimen quality metrics.The results validate herbarium spectral data for trait prediction and taxonomic discrimination, and demonstrate that trait modeling can benefit from the complementary use of pressed‐leaf and herbarium‐leaf spectral datasets. These promising advancements help to justify the spectral digitization of plant biodiversity collections and support their application in broad ecological and evolutionary investigations. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Methods in Ecology and Evolution)
    Abstract Community‐wide efforts to digitize herbarium specimens have facilitated novel uses of specimen data across scales. However, the need for destructive sampling has prevented large‐scale examination of foliar functional traits. We demonstrate that nondestructive reflectance spectra are an effective tool for estimating leaf traits from herbarium collections.Using partial least squares regression (PLSR), we developed and evaluated trait estimation models for leaf mass per area (LMA), nitrogen content (N) and carbon content (C) from nondestructive leaf‐level spectra and destructive trait measurements from herbarium specimens. Our modelling dataset consisted of temperate species collected in the Minneapolis‐St. Paul area (Minnesota, USA) between 1876 and 2022. We also trained biased models excluding sample subsets corresponding to specimen age, habit, growth form and species categories to assess the transferability of PLSR trait estimation models. Finally, we evaluated whether leaf traits estimated from spectra recover the temporal trends observed in destructively measured traits.Our PLSR models accurately estimate LMA and N, and reasonably estimate C. They are robust to sample greenness, specimen age and species, but sensitive to mismatches in functional group categories between the training and target data. Furthermore, spectrally estimated LMA and N reproduce temporal trends observed in measured traits over the 146‐year time series; estimated C reproduces most temporal trends despite poorer model performance than the other traits.Given the limitations of broad destructive sampling from herbarium collections, we show that PLSR models trained on younger specimens can reliably estimate leaf traits from older specimens. While we caution that trait estimation models are only as good as their training data, we are optimistic that spectroscopy can capture the extensive functional data preserved in herbarium collections in a largely nondestructive manner. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, bioRxiv)
    Plant functional traits vary across leaf ontogeny and phenology, yet most trait data are snapshots from narrow time windows that miss this temporal dimension. Leaf spectra are increasingly used with empirical models to predict traits, but whether such models accurately capture phenological variation remains unclear. We monitored leaf traits and spectra weekly across a full growing season, generating 7,515 spectra from seven temperate species. Using partial least squares regression, we built three models [all-season and week-as-covariate models (both trained on full-phenology data), and a peak-season model] and evaluated them alongside a widely used model against directly measured traits. Full-phenology models predicted LMA and equivalent water thickness (EWT) with high accuracy (R2 > 0.85) and nitrogen with intermediate accuracy (R2 = 0.64); carbon accuracy was low across all models (R2 < 0.26), likely due to a small sample size. Peak-season trained models performed poorly when evaluated across the full season, often producing biologically unrealistic predictions. Traits and spectra varied significantly across phenological stages both within and among species. Ignoring phenological variation systematically biases trait estimates and ecological inference. Coupled with phenologically representative training data, spectra can capture the temporal dynamics of plant function, enabling novel research in ecology and evolution. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, New Phytologist)
     Large intraspecific functional trait variation strongly impacts many aspects of communities and ecosystems, and is the medium upon which evolution works. Yet intraspecific trait variation is inconsistent and hard to predict across traits, species, and locations.  We measured within-species variation in leaf mass per area (LMA), leaf dry matter content (LDMC), branch wood density (WD), and allocation to stem area vs. leaf area in branches (branch Huber value, HV) across the aridity range of seven Australian eucalypts and a cooccuring Acacia species to explore how traits and their variances change with aridity.  Within-species, we found consistent increases in LMA, LDMC and WD, and HV with increasing aridity, resulting in consistent trait coordination across leaves and branches. However, this coordination only emerged across sites with large climate differences. Unlike trait means, patterns of trait variance with aridity were mixed across populations and species. Only LDMC showed constrained trait variation in more xeric species and drier populations that could indicate limits to plasticity or heritable trait variation.  Our results highlight that climate can drive consistent within-species trait patterns, but that patterns might often be obscured by the complex nature of morphological traits, sampling incomplete species ranges, or sampling confounded stress gradients. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Text Encoded Conversion
  • XML
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email