More Like this

1. Search for dark matter produced in association with a single top quark and an energetic W boson in $$\sqrt{s}=$$ 13 TeV $$pp$$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11582-z  

   Aad, G. ; Abbott, B. ; Abbott, D. C. ; Abeling, K. ; Abidi, S. H. ; Aboulhorma, A. ; Abramowicz, H. ; Abreu, H. ; Abulaiti, Y. ; Hoffman, A. C. ; et al ( July 2023 , The European Physical Journal C)

   This paper presents a search for dark matter,$$\chi $$$\chi$, using events with a single top quark and an energeticWboson. The analysis is based on proton–proton collision data collected with the ATLAS experiment at$$\sqrt{s}=$$$\sqrt{s}=$13 TeV during LHC Run 2 (2015–2018), corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$$^{-1}$$${}^{-1}$. The search considers final states with zero or one charged lepton (electron or muon), at least oneb-jet and large missing transverse momentum. In addition, a result from a previous search considering two-charged-lepton final states is included in the interpretation of the results. The data are found to be in good agreement with the Standard Model predictions and the results are interpreted in terms of 95% confidence-level exclusion limits in the context of a class of dark matter models involving an extended two-Higgs-doublet sector together with a pseudoscalar mediator particle. The search is particularly sensitive to on-shell production of the charged Higgs boson state,$$H^{\pm }$$$H^{\pm }$, arising from the two-Higgs-doublet mixing, and its semi-invisible decays via the mediator particle,a:$$H^{\pm } \rightarrow W^\pm a (\rightarrow \chi \chi )$$$H^{\pm }\to W^{\pm }a(\to \chi \chi )$. Signal models with$$H^{\pm }$$$H^{\pm }$masses up to 1.5 TeV andamasses up to 350 GeV are excluded assuming a$$\tan \beta $$$tan\beta$value of 1. For masses ofaof 150 (250) GeV,$$\tan \beta $$$tan\beta$values up to 2 are excluded for$$H^{\pm }$$$H^{\pm }$masses between 200 (400) GeV and 1.5 TeV. Signals with$$\tan \beta $$$tan\beta$values between 20 and 30 are excluded for$$H^{\pm }$$$H^{\pm }$masses between 500 and 800 GeV.

    

   more » « less
2. A search for decays of the Higgs boson to invisible particles in events with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson in proton-proton collisions at $$\sqrt{s} = 13\,\text {Te}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V} $$

   https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11952-7  

   Tumasyan, A. ; Adam, W. ; Andrejkovic, J. W. ; Bergauer, T. ; Chatterjee, S. ; Damanakis, K. ; Dragicevic, M. ; Escalante Del Valle, A. ; Hussain, P. S. ; Jeitler, M. ; et al ( October 2023 , The European Physical Journal C)

   A search for decays to invisible particles of Higgs bosons produced in association with a top-antitop quark pair or a vector boson, which both decay to a fully hadronic final state, has been performed using proton-proton collision data collected at$${\sqrt{s}=13\,\text {Te}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V}}$$$\sqrt{s}=13\text{Te}\text{V}$by the CMS experiment at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 138$$\,\text {fb}^{-1}$$${\text{fb}}^{-1}$. The 95% confidence level upper limit set on the branching fraction of the 125$$\,\text {Ge}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V}$$$\text{Ge}\text{V}$Higgs boson to invisible particles,$${\mathcal {B}({\textrm{H}} \rightarrow \text {inv})}$$$B(\text{H}\to \text{inv})$, is 0.54 (0.39 expected), assuming standard model production cross sections. The results of this analysis are combined with previous$${\mathcal {B}({\textrm{H}} \rightarrow \text {inv})}$$$B(\text{H}\to \text{inv})$searches carried out at$${\sqrt{s}=7}$$$\sqrt{s}=7$, 8, and 13$$\,\text {Te}\hspace{-.08em}\text {V}$$$\text{Te}\text{V}$in complementary production modes. The combined upper limit at 95% confidence level on$${\mathcal {B}({\textrm{H}} \rightarrow \text {inv})}$$$B(\text{H}\to \text{inv})$is 0.15 (0.08 expected).

    

   more » « less
3. Evidence of a liquid–liquid phase transition in H$$_2$$O and D$$_2$$O from path-integral molecular dynamics simulations

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-09525-x  

   Eltareb, Ali ; Lopez, Gustavo E. ; Giovambattista, Nicolas ( April 2022 , Scientific Reports)

   We perform path-integral molecular dynamics (PIMD), ring-polymer MD (RPMD), and classical MD simulations of H$$_2$$${}_2$O and D$$_2$$${}_2$O using the q-TIP4P/F water model over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. The density$$\rho (T)$$$\rho \left(T\right)$, isothermal compressibility$$\kappa _T(T)$$${\kappa }_T\left(T\right)$, and self-diffusion coefficientsD(T) of H$$_2$$${}_2$O and D$$_2$$${}_2$O are in excellent agreement with available experimental data; the isobaric heat capacity$$C_P(T)$$$C_P\left(T\right)$obtained from PIMD and MD simulations agree qualitatively well with the experiments. Some of these thermodynamic properties exhibit anomalous maxima upon isobaric cooling, consistent with recent experiments and with the possibility that H$$_2$$${}_2$O and D$$_2$$${}_2$O exhibit a liquid-liquid critical point (LLCP) at low temperatures and positive pressures. The data from PIMD/MD for H$$_2$$${}_2$O and D$$_2$$${}_2$O can be fitted remarkably well using the Two-State-Equation-of-State (TSEOS). Using the TSEOS, we estimate that the LLCP for q-TIP4P/F H$$_2$$${}_2$O, from PIMD simulations, is located at$$P_c = 167 \pm 9$$$P_c=167\pm 9$ MPa,$$T_c = 159 \pm 6$$$T_c=159\pm 6$ K, and$$\rho _c = 1.02 \pm 0.01$$${\rho }_c=1.02\pm 0.01$ g/cm$$^3$$${}^3$. Isotope substitution effects are important; the LLCP location in q-TIP4P/F D$$_2$$${}_2$O is estimated to be$$P_c = 176 \pm 4$$$P_c=176\pm 4$ MPa,$$T_c = 177 \pm 2$$$T_c=177\pm 2$ K, and$$\rho _c = 1.13 \pm 0.01$$${\rho }_c=1.13\pm 0.01$ g/cm$$^3$$${}^3$. Interestingly, for the water model studied, differences in the LLCP location from PIMD and MD simulations suggest that nuclear quantum effects (i.e., atoms delocalization) play an important role in the thermodynamics of water around the LLCP (from the MD simulations of q-TIP4P/F water,$$P_c = 203 \pm 4$$$P_c=203\pm 4$ MPa,$$T_c = 175 \pm 2$$$T_c=175\pm 2$ K, and$$\rho _c = 1.03 \pm 0.01$$${\rho }_c=1.03\pm 0.01$ g/cm$$^3$$${}^3$). Overall, our results strongly support the LLPT scenario to explain water anomalous behavior, independently of the fundamental differences between classical MD and PIMD techniques. The reported values of$$T_c$$$T_c$for D$$_2$$${}_2$O and, particularly, H$$_2$$${}_2$O suggest that improved water models are needed for the study of supercooled water.

    

   more » « less
4. Ultrahigh evaporative heat transfer measured locally in submicron water films

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26182-2  

   Wang, Xiaoman ; Ghaffarizadeh, S. Arman ; He, Xiao ; McGaughey, Alan J. H. ; Malen, Jonathan A. ( December 2022 , Scientific Reports)

   Thin film evaporation is a widely-used thermal management solution for micro/nano-devices with high energy densities. Local measurements of the evaporation rate at a liquid-vapor interface, however, are limited. We present a continuous profile of the evaporation heat transfer coefficient ($$h_{\text {evap}}$$$h_{\text{evap}}$) in the submicron thin film region of a water meniscus obtained through local measurements interpreted by a machine learned surrogate of the physical system. Frequency domain thermoreflectance (FDTR), a non-contact laser-based method with micrometer lateral resolution, is used to induce and measure the meniscus evaporation. A neural network is then trained using finite element simulations to extract the$$h_{\text {evap}}$$$h_{\text{evap}}$profile from the FDTR data. For a substrate superheat of 20 K, the maximum$$h_{\text {evap}}$$$h_{\text{evap}}$is$$1.0_{-0.3}^{+0.5}$$$1.0_{-0.3}^{+0.5}$ MW/$$\text {m}^2$$${\text{m}}^2$-K at a film thickness of$$15_{-3}^{+29}$$${15}_{-3}^{+29}$ nm. This ultrahigh$$h_{\text {evap}}$$$h_{\text{evap}}$value is two orders of magnitude larger than the heat transfer coefficient for single-phase forced convection or evaporation from a bulk liquid. Under the assumption of constant wall temperature, our profiles of$$h_{\text {evap}}$$$h_{\text{evap}}$and meniscus thickness suggest that 62% of the heat transfer comes from the region lying 0.1–1 μm from the meniscus edge, whereas just 29% comes from the next 100 μm.

    

   more » « less
5. A simple analytic model for predicting the wicking velocity in micropillar arrays

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56361-7  

   Krishnan, Siva Rama ; Bal, John ; Putnam, Shawn A. ( December 2019 , Scientific Reports)

   Hemiwicking is the phenomena where a liquid wets a textured surface beyond its intrinsic wetting length due to capillary action and imbibition. In this work, we derive a simple analytical model for hemiwicking in micropillar arrays. The model is based on the combined effects of capillary action dictated by interfacial and intermolecular pressures gradients within the curved liquid meniscus and fluid drag from the pillars at ultra-low Reynolds numbers$${\boldsymbol{(}}{{\bf{10}}}^{{\boldsymbol{-}}{\bf{7}}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{\bf{Re}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{{\bf{10}}}^{{\boldsymbol{-}}{\bf{3}}}{\boldsymbol{)}}$$$\left({10}^{-7}\lesssim \mathrm{Re}\lesssim {10}^{-3}\right)$. Fluid drag is conceptualized via a critical Reynolds number:$${\bf{Re}}{\boldsymbol{=}}\frac{{{\bf{v}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{{\bf{x}}}_{{\bf{0}}}}{{\boldsymbol{\nu }}}$$$\mathrm{Re}=\frac{v_0{x}_0}{\nu }$, wherev₀corresponds to the maximum wetting speed on a flat, dry surface andx₀is the extension length of the liquid meniscus that drives the bulk fluid toward the adsorbed thin-film region. The model is validated with wicking experiments on different hemiwicking surfaces in conjunction withv₀andx₀measurements using Water$${\boldsymbol{(}}{{\bf{v}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\approx }}{\bf{2}}\,{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{/}}{\bf{s}}{\boldsymbol{,}}\,{\bf{25}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{{\bf{x}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{\bf{28}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{)}}$$$\left(v_0\approx 2m/s,25\mu m\lesssim x_0\lesssim 28\mu m\right)$, viscous FC-70$${\boldsymbol{(}}{{\boldsymbol{v}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\approx }}{\bf{0.3}}\,{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{/}}{\bf{s}}{\boldsymbol{,}}\,{\bf{18.6}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{{\boldsymbol{x}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{\bf{38.6}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{)}}$$$\left(v_0\approx 0.3m/s,18.6\mu m\lesssim x_0\lesssim 38.6\mu m\right)$and lower viscosity Ethanol$${\boldsymbol{(}}{{\boldsymbol{v}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\approx }}{\bf{1.2}}\,{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{/}}{\bf{s}}{\boldsymbol{,}}\,{\bf{11.8}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{{\bf{x}}}_{{\bf{0}}}{\boldsymbol{\lesssim }}{\bf{33.3}}\,{\boldsymbol{\mu }}{\bf{m}}{\boldsymbol{)}}$$$\left(v_0\approx 1.2m/s,11.8\mu m\lesssim x_0\lesssim 33.3\mu m\right)$.

    

   more » « less