More Like this

1. A Model for Eruptive Mass Loss in Massive Stars

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad701e  

   Cheng, Shelley_J; Goldberg, Jared_A; Cantiello, Matteo; Bauer, Evan_B; Renzo, Mathieu; Conroy, Charlie (October 2024, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract Eruptive mass loss in massive stars is known to occur, but the mechanism(s) are not yet well understood. One proposed physical explanation appeals to opacity-driven super-Eddington luminosities in stellar envelopes. Here, we present a 1D model for eruptive mass loss and implement this model in theMESAstellar evolution code. The model identifies regions in the star where the energy associated with a local super-Eddington luminosity exceeds the binding energy of the overlaying envelope. The material above such regions is ejected from the star. Stars with initial masses of 10−100M_⊙at solar and SMC metallicities are evolved through core helium burning, with and without this new eruptive mass-loss scheme. We find that eruptive mass loss of up to ∼10⁻²M_⊙yr⁻¹can be driven by this mechanism, and occurs in a vertical band on the H-R diagram between $3.5\lesssim \log \left(T_{\mathrm{eff}}/\mathrm{K}\right)\lesssim 4.0$. This predicted eruptive mass loss prevents stars of initial masses ≳20M_⊙from evolving to become red supergiants (RSGs), with the stars instead ending their lives as blue supergiants, and offers a possible explanation for the observed lack of RSGs in that mass regime. 

   more » « less
2. An Exceptional Dimming Event for a Massive, Cool Supergiant in M51

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac626c  

   Jencson, Jacob E.; Sand, David J.; Andrews, Jennifer E.; Smith, Nathan; Pearson, Jeniveve; Strader, Jay; Valenti, Stefano; Beasor, Emma R.; Rothberg, Barry (May 2022, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract We present the discovery of an exceptional dimming event in a cool supergiant star in the Local Volume spiral M51. The star, dubbed M51-DS1, was found as part of a Hubble Space Telescope (HST) search for failed supernovae (SNe). The supergiant, which is plausibly associated with a very young (≲6 Myr) stellar population, showed clear variability (amplitude ΔF814W≈ 0.7 mag) in numerous HST images obtained between 1995 and 2016, before suddenly dimming by >2 mag inF814Wsometime between late 2017 and mid-2019. In follow-up data from 2021, the star rebrightened, ruling out a failed supernova. Prior to its near-disappearance, the star was luminous and red (M_F814W≲ − 7.6 mag,F606W−F814W= 1.9–2.2 mag). Modeling of the pre-dimming spectral energy distribution of the star favors a highly reddened, very luminous ( $\log \left[L/L_{\odot }\right]=5.4$–5.7) star withT_eff≈ 3700–4700 K, indicative of a cool yellow or post-red supergiant (RSG) with an initial mass of ≈26–40M_⊙. However, the local interstellar extinction and circumstellar extinction are uncertain, and could be lower: the near-IR colors are consistent with an RSG, which would be cooler (T_eff≲ 3700 K) and slightly less luminous ( $\log \left[L/L_{\odot }\right]=5.2$–5.3), giving an inferred initial mass of ≈19–22M_⊙. In either case, the dimming may be explained by a rare episode of enhanced mass loss that temporarily obscures the star, potentially a more extreme counterpart to the 2019–2020 “Great Dimming” of Betelgeuse. Given the emerging evidence that massive evolved stars commonly exhibit variability that can mimic a disappearing star, our work highlights a substantial challenge in identifying true failed SNe. 

   more » « less
3. The Early Ultraviolet Light Curves of Type II Supernovae and the Radii of Their Progenitor Stars

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3de8  

   Irani, Ido; Morag, Jonathan; Gal-Yam, Avishay; Waxman, Eli; Schulze, Steve; Sollerman, Jesper; Hinds, K-Ryan; Perley, Daniel A; Chen, Ping; Strotjohann, Nora L; et al (July 2024, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract We present a sample of 34 normal Type II supernovae (SNe II) detected with the Zwicky Transient Facility, with multiband UV light curves starting att≤ 4 days after explosion, and X-ray observations. We characterize the early UV-optical color, provide empirical host-extinction corrections, and show that thet> 2 day UV-optical colors and the blackbody evolution of the sample are consistent with shock cooling (SC) regardless of the presence of “flash ionization” features. We present a framework for fitting SC models that can reproduce the parameters of a set of multigroup simulations up to 20% in radius and velocity. Observations of 15 SNe II are well fit by models with breakout radii <10¹⁴cm. Eighteen SNe are typically more luminous, with observations att≥ 1 day that are better fit by a model with a large >10¹⁴cm breakout radius. However, these fits predict an early rise during the first day that is too slow. We suggest that these large-breakout events are explosions of stars with an inflated envelope or with confined circumstellar material (CSM). Using the X-ray data, we derive constraints on the extended (∼10¹⁵cm) CSM density independent of spectral modeling and find that most SN II progenitors lose $\dot{M}<{10}^{-4}{M}_{\odot }{\mathrm{yr}}^{-1}$up to a few years before explosion. We show that the overall observed breakout radius distribution is skewed to higher radii due to a luminosity bias. We argue that the ${66}_{-22}^{+11}\%$of red supergiants (RSGs) explode as SNe II with breakout radii consistent with the observed distribution of RSGs, with a tail extending to large radii, likely due to the presence of CSM. 

   more » « less
4. The Scale of Stellar Yields: Implications of the Measured Mean Iron Yield of Core Collapse Supernovae

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6313  

   Weinberg, David_H; Griffith, Emily_J; Johnson, James_W; Thompson, Todd_A (September 2024, The Astrophysical Journal)

   Abstract The scale ofα-element yields is difficult to predict from theory because of uncertainties in massive star evolution, supernova physics, and black hole formation, and it is difficult to constrain empirically because the impact of higher yields can be compensated by greater metal loss in galactic winds. We use a recent measurement of the mean iron yield of core collapse supernovae (CCSN) by Rodriguez et al., ${\overline{y}}_{\mathrm{Fe}}^{\mathrm{cc}}=0.058\pm 0.007M_{\odot }$, to infer the scale ofα-element yields by assuming that the plateau of [α/Fe] abundance ratios observed in low-metallicity stars represents the yield ratio of CCSN. For a plateau at [α/Fe]_cc= 0.45, we find that the population-averaged yields of O and Mg are about equal to the solar abundance of these elements, $\log y_{\mathrm{O}}^{\mathrm{cc}}/Z_{\mathrm{O},\odot }=\log y_{\mathrm{Mg}}^{\mathrm{cc}}/Z_{\mathrm{Mg},\odot }=-0.01\pm 0.1$, where $y_{\mathrm{X}}^{\mathrm{cc}}$is the mass of element X produced by massive stars per unit mass of star formation. The inferred O and Fe yields agree with predictions of the Sukhbold et al. CCSN models assuming their Z9.6+N20 neutrino-driven engine, a scenario in which many progenitors withM< 40M_⊙implode to black holes rather than exploding. The yields are lower than assumed in many models of the galaxy mass–metallicity relation, reducing the level of outflows needed to match observed abundances. Our one-zone chemical evolution models with $\eta ={\dot{M}}_{\mathrm{out}}/{\dot{M}}_{*}\approx 0.6$evolve to solar metallicity at late times. By further requiring that models reach [α/Fe] ≈ 0 at late times, we infer a Hubble-time integrated Type Ia supernova rate of $1.1\times {10}^{-3}{M}_{\odot }^{-1}$, compatible with estimates from supernova surveys. 

   more » « less
5. A Luminous Red Supergiant and Dusty Long-period Variable Progenitor for SN 2023ixf

   https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ace618  

   Jencson, Jacob E.; Pearson, Jeniveve; Beasor, Emma R.; Lau, Ryan M.; Andrews, Jennifer E.; Bostroem, K. Azalee; Dong 董, Yize 一泽; Engesser, Michael; Gomez, Sebastian; Guolo, Muryel; et al (July 2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters)

   Abstract We analyze pre-explosion near- and mid-infrared (IR) imaging of the site of SN 2023ixf in the nearby spiral galaxy M101 and characterize the candidate progenitor star. The star displays compelling evidence of variability with a possible period of ≈1000 days and an amplitude of Δm≈ 0.6 mag in extensive monitoring with the Spitzer Space Telescope since 2004, likely indicative of radial pulsations. Variability consistent with this period is also seen in the near-IRJandK_sbands between 2010 and 2023, up to just 10 days before the explosion. Beyond the periodic variability, we do not find evidence for any IR-bright pre-supernova outbursts in this time period. The IR brightness ( $M_{K_s}=-10.7$mag) and color (J−K_s= 1.6 mag) of the star suggest a luminous and dusty red supergiant. Modeling of the phase-averaged spectral energy distribution (SED) yields constraints on the stellar temperature ( $T_{\mathrm{eff}}={3500}_{-1400}^{+800}$K) and luminosity ( $\log L/L_{\odot }=5.1\pm 0.2$). This places the candidate among the most luminous Type II supernova progenitors with direct imaging constraints, with the caveat that many of these rely only on optical measurements. Comparison with stellar evolution models gives an initial mass ofM_init= 17 ± 4M_⊙. We estimate the pre-supernova mass-loss rate of the star between 3 and 19 yr before explosion from the SED modeling at $\dot{M}\approx 3\times {10}^{-5}$to 3 × 10⁻⁴M_⊙yr⁻¹for an assumed wind velocity ofv_w= 10 km s⁻¹, perhaps pointing to enhanced mass loss in a pulsation-driven wind. 

   more » « less