skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: The Arctic Surface Heating Efficiency of Tropospheric Energy Flux Events
Abstract This paper examines the processes that drive Arctic anomalous surface warming and sea ice loss during winter-season tropospheric energy flux events, synoptic periods of increased tropospheric energy flux convergence ( F trop ), using the NASA MERRA-2 reanalysis. During an event, a poleward anomaly in F trop initially increases the sensible and latent energy of the Arctic troposphere; as the warm and moist troposphere loses heat, the anomalous energy source is balanced by a flux upward across the tropopause and a downward net surface flux. A new metric for the Arctic surface heating efficiency ( E trop ) is defined, which measures the fraction of the energy source that reaches the surface. Composites of high-, medium-, and low-efficiency events help identify key physical factors, including the vertical structure of F trop and Arctic surface preconditioning. In high-efficiency events ( E trop ≥ 0.63), a bottom-heavy poleward F trop occurs in the presence of an anomalously warm and unstratified Arctic—a consequence of decreased sea ice—resulting in increased vertical mixing, enhanced near-surface warming and moistening, and further sea ice loss. Smaller E trop , and thus weaker surface impacts, are found in events with anomalously large initial sea ice extent and more vertically uniform F trop . These differences in E trop are manifested primarily through turbulent heat fluxes rather than downward longwave radiation. The frequency of high-efficiency events has increased from the period 1980–99 to the period 2000–19, contributing to Arctic surface warming and sea ice decline.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2026863
PAR ID:
10387909
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Climate
Volume:
35
Issue:
18
ISSN:
0894-8755
Page Range / eLocation ID:
5897 to 5913
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract This study quantifies the contribution to Arctic winter surface warming from changes in the tropospheric energy transport (Ftrop) and the efficiency with whichFtropheats the surface in the RCP8.5 warming scenario of the Community Earth System Model Large Ensemble. A metric for this efficiency,Etrop, measures the fraction of anomalousFtropthat is balanced by an anomalous net surface flux (NSF). Drivers ofEtropare identified in synoptic‐scale events during whichFtropis the dominant driver of NSF.Etropis sensitive to the vertical structure ofFtropand pre‐existing Arctic lower‐tropospheric stability (LTS). In RCP8.5, winter‐meanFtropdecreases from 95.1 to 85.4 W m−2, whileEtropincreases by 5.7%, likely driven by decreased Arctic LTS, indicating an increased coupling betweenFtropand the surface energy budget. The net impact of decreasingFtropand increasing efficiency is a positive 0.7 W m−2contribution to winter‐season surface heating. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
    Abstract The flux of moist static energy into the polar regions plays a key role in the energy budget and climate of the polar regions. While usually studied from a vertically integrated perspective ( F wall ), this analysis examines its vertical structure, using the NASA-MERRA-2 reanalysis to compute climatological and anomalous fluxes of sensible, latent, and potential energy across 70°N and 65°S for the period 1980–2016. The vertical structure of the climatological flux is bimodal, with peaks in the middle to lower troposphere and middle to upper stratosphere. The near-zero flux at the tropopause defines the boundary between stratospheric ( F strat ) and tropospheric ( F trop ) contributions to F wall . Especially at 70°N, F strat is found to be important to the climatology and variability of F wall , contributing 20.9 W m −2 to F wall (19% of F wall ) during the winter and explaining 23% of the variance of F wall . During winter, an anomalous poleward increase in F strat preceding a sudden stratospheric warming is followed by an increase in outgoing longwave radiation anomalies, with little influence on the surface energy budget of the Arctic. Conversely, a majority of the energy input by an anomalous poleward increase in F trop goes toward warming the Arctic surface. Overall, F trop is found to be a better metric than F wall for evaluating the influence of atmospheric circulations on the Arctic surface climate. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract. Today's Arctic is characterized by a lengthening of the sea ice melt season, as well as by fast and at times unseasonal melt events. Such anomalous melt cases have been identified in Pacific and Atlantic Arctic sector sea ice studies. Through observational analyses, we document an unprecedented, concurrent marginal ice zone melt event in the Bering Sea and Labrador Sea in March of 2023. Taken independently, variability in the cold-season ice edge at synoptic timescales is common. However, such anomalous, short-term ice loss over either region during the climatological sea ice maxima is uncommon, and the tandem ice loss that occurred qualifies this as a rare event. The atmospheric setting that supported the unseasonal melt events was preceded by a sudden stratospheric warming event amidst background La Niña conditions that led to positive tropospheric height anomalies across much of the Arctic and the development of anomalous mid-troposphere ridges over the ice loss regions. These large-scale anticyclonic centers funneled extremely warm and moist airstreams onto the ice causing melt. Further analysis identified the presence of atmospheric rivers within these warm airstreams whose characteristics likely contributed to this bi-regional ice melt event. Whether such a confluence of anomalous wintertime events associated with troposphere–stratosphere coupling may occur more often in a warming Arctic remains a research area ripe for further exploration. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract. Today’s Arctic is characterized by a lengthening of the sea ice melt season, but also by fast and at times unseasonal melt events. Such anomalous melt cases have been identified in Pacific and Atlantic Arctic sector sea ice studies. Through observational analyses, we document an unprecedented, simultaneous marginal ice zone melt event in the Bering Sea and Labrador Sea in March of 2023. Taken independently, variability in the cold season ice edge at synoptic time scales is common. However, such anomalous, short-term ice loss over either region during the climatological sea ice maxima is uncommon, and the tandem ice loss that occurred qualifies this as a rare event. The atmospheric setting that supported the unseasonal melt events was preceded by a sudden stratospheric warming event that, along with ongoing La Niña teleconnections, led to positive tropospheric height anomalies across much of the Arctic and the development of anomalous mid-troposphere ridges over the ice loss regions. These large-scale anticyclonic centers funneled extremely warm and moist airstreams onto the ice causing melt. Further analysis identified the presence of atmospheric rivers within these warm airstreams whose characteristics likely contributed to this bi-regional ice melt event. Whether such a confluence of anomalous wintertime events associated with troposphere-stratosphere coupling may occur more often in a warming Arctic remains a research area ripe for further exploration. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Tides are an important factor shaping the sea ice system in the Arctic Ocean by altering vertical heat fluxes and advection patterns. Unfortunately, observations are sparse, and the analysis of tides is complicated by the proximity of wind-driven inertial oscillations to the semidiurnal frequencies. Furthermore, computational costs typically prohibit the inclusion of tides in ocean models, leaving a significant gap in our understanding. Motivated by summer observations showing elevated downward surface heat fluxes in the presence of tides, we analyzed simulations carried out with an eddy-permitting coupled ice–ocean model to quantify the impact of tidal effects on Arctic sea ice. In line with previous studies, we find an overall decrease in sea ice volume when tides are included in the simulations, associated with increased vertical mixing and the upward flux of heat from deeper layers of the Arctic Ocean, but this sea ice volume decrease is less pronounced than previously thought. Surprisingly, our simulations suggest that in summer, Arctic sea ice area is larger, by up to 1.5%, when tides are included in the simulations. This effect is partly caused by an increased downward surface heat flux and a consequently lower sea surface temperature, delaying sea ice melting predominantly in the Siberian Seas, where tides are moderately strong and the warm Atlantic Water core is located relatively deep and does not encroach on the wide continental shelf. Here, tidally enhanced downward heat flux from the surface in summer can dominate over the increased upward heat flux from the warm Atlantic Water layer. Significance StatementThis study sheds light on the complex and understudied role of tides in Arctic sea ice dynamics. By utilizing advanced computer models, our research uncovers that, contrary to common expectations, tides contribute to a seasonal increase in sea ice area by up to 1.5% in summer. This effect is attributed to enhanced advection of sea ice into the Siberian Seas and a local increase in downward heat flux reducing sea surface temperatures, thereby delaying sea ice melting in this region. Our findings challenge prevailing notions about the negative impact of tides on sea ice and highlight the importance of incorporating tidal impacts in ocean models to improve predictions of Arctic sea ice changes, key for our understanding of both Arctic and global climate dynamics. 
    more » « less