skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Validation of remote-sensing products of sea-ice motion: a case study in the western Arctic Ocean
Abstract The accuracy of sea-ice motion products provided by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) and the Ocean and Sea Ice Satellite Application Facility (OSI-SAF) was validated with data collected by ice drifters that were deployed in the western Arctic Ocean in 2014 and 2016. Data from both NSIDC and OSI-SAF products exhibited statistically significant ( p < 0.001) correlation with drifter data. The OSI-SAF product tended to overestimate ice speed, while underestimation was demonstrated for the NSIDC product, especially for the melt season and the marginal ice zone. Monthly Lagrangian trajectories of ice floes were reconstructed using the products. Larger spatial variability in the deviation between NSIDC and drifter trajectories was observed than that of OSI-SAF, and seasonal variability in the deviation for NSIDC was observed. Furthermore, trajectories reconstructed using the NSIDC product were sensitive to variations in sea-ice concentration. The feasibility of using remote-sensing products to characterize sea-ice deformation was assessed by evaluating the distance between two arbitrary positions as estimated by the products. Compared with the OSI-SAF product, relative errors are lower (<11.6%), and spatial-temporal resolutions are higher in the NSIDC product, which makes it more suitable for estimating sea-ice deformation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1722729
PAR ID:
10391048
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Glaciology
Volume:
66
Issue:
259
ISSN:
0022-1430
Page Range / eLocation ID:
807 to 821
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Earth and Space Science)
    Abstract The Arctic region is experiencing significant changes due to climate change, and the resulting decline in sea ice concentration and extent is already impacting ocean dynamics and exacerbating coastal hazards in the region. In this context, numerical models play a crucial role in simulating the interactions between the ocean, land, sea ice, and atmosphere, thus supporting scientific studies in the region. This research aims to evaluate how different sea ice products with spatial resolutions varying from 2 to 25 km influence a phase averaged spectral wave model results in the Alaskan Arctic under storm conditions. Four events throughout the Fall to Winter seasons in 2019 were utilized to assess the accuracy of wave simulations generated under the dynamic sea ice conditions found in the Arctic. The selected sea ice products used to parameterize the numerical wave model include the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) sea ice concentration, the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Re‐Analysis (ERA5), the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model‐Community Ice CodE (HYCOM‐CICE) system assimilated with Navy Coupled Ocean Data Assimilation (NCODA), and the High‐resolution Ice‐Ocean Modeling and Assimilation System (HIOMAS). The Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) model's accuracy in simulating waves using these sea ice products was evaluated against Sea State Daily Multisensor L3 satellite observations. Results show wave simulations using ERA5 consistently exhibited high correlation with observations, maintaining an accuracy above 0.83 to the observations across all events. Conversely, HIOMAS demonstrated the weakest performance, particularly during the Winter, with the lowest correlation of 0.40 to the observations. Remarkably, ERA5 surpassed all other products by up to 30% in accuracy during the selected storm events, and even when an ensemble was assessed by combining the selected sea ice products, ERA5's individual performance remained unmatched. Our study provides insights for selecting sea ice products under different sea ice conditions for accurately simulating waves and coastal hazards in high latitudes. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, The cryosphere)
    Assimilation of remote-sensing products of sea ice thickness (SIT) into sea ice–ocean models has been shown to improve the quality of sea ice forecasts. Key open questions are whether assimilation of lower-level data products such as radar freeboard (RFB) can further improve model performance and what performance gains can be achieved through joint assimilation of these data products in combination with a snow depth product. The Arctic Mission Benefit Analysis system was developed to address this type of question. Using the quantitative network design (QND) approach, the system can evaluate, in a mathematically rigorous fashion, the observational constraints imposed by individual and groups of data products. We demonstrate the approach by presenting assessments of the observation impact (added value) of different Earth observation (EO) products in terms of the uncertainty reduction in a 4-week forecast of sea ice volume (SIV) and snow volume (SNV) for three regions along the Northern Sea Route in May 2015 using a coupled model of the sea ice–ocean system, specifically the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model. We assess seven satellite products: three real products and four hypothetical products. The real products are monthly SIT, sea ice freeboard (SIFB), and RFB, all derived from CryoSat-2 by the AlfredWegener Institute. These are complemented by two hypothetical monthly laser freeboard (LFB) products with low and high accuracy, as well as two hypothetical monthly snow depth products with low and high accuracy. On the basis of the per-pixel uncertainty ranges provided with the CryoSat-2 SIT, SIFB, and RFB products, the SIT and RFB achieve a much better performance for SIV than the SIFB product. For SNV, the performance of SIT is only low, the performance of SIFB is higher and the performance of RFB is yet higher. A hypothetical LFB product with low accuracy (20 cm uncertainty) falls between SIFB and RFB in performance for both SIV and SNV. A reduction in the uncertainty of the LFB product to 2 cm yields a significant increase in performance. Combining either of the SIT or freeboard products with a hypothetical snow depth product achieves a significant performance increase. The uncertainty in the snow product matters: a higher-accuracy product achieves an extra performance gain. Providing spatial and temporal uncertainty correlations with the EO products would be beneficial not only for QND assessments, but also for assimilation of the products. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology)
    Abstract Internal waves generated by the interaction of the surface tides with topography are known to propagate long distances and lead to observable effects such as sea level variability, ocean currents, and mixing. In an effort to describe and predict these waves, the present work is concerned with using geographically distributed data from satellite altimeters and drifting buoys to estimate and map the baroclinic sea level associated with the M2, S2, N2, K1, and O1tides. A new mapping methodology is developed, based on a mixedL1/L2-norm optimization, and compared with previously developed methods for tidal estimation from altimeter data. The altimeter and drifter data are considered separately in their roles for estimating tides and for cross-validating estimates obtained with independent data. Estimates obtained from altimetry and drifter data are found to agree remarkably well in regions where the drifter trajectories are spatially dense; however, heterogeneity of the drifter trajectories is a disadvantage when they are considered alone for tidal estimation. When the different data types are combined by using geodetic mission altimetry to cross validate estimates obtained with either exact-repeat altimetry or drifter data, and subsequently averaging the latter estimates, the estimates significantly improve on the previously published HRET8.1 model, as measured by their utility for predicting sea level and surface currents in the open ocean. The methodology has been applied to estimate the annual modulations of M2, which are found to have much smaller amplitudes compared to those reported in HRET8.1, and suggest that the latter estimates of these tides were not reliable. Significance StatementThe mechanical and thermodynamic forcing of the ocean occurs primarily at very large scales associated with the gravitational perturbations of the sun and moon (tides), atmospheric wind stress, and solar insolation, but the frictional forces within the ocean act on very small scales. This research addresses the question of how the large-scale tidal forcing is transformed into the smaller-scale motion capable of being influenced by friction. The results show where internal waves are generated and how they transport energy across ocean basins to eventually be dissipated by friction. The results are useful to scientists interested in mapping the flows of mechanical energy in the ocean and predicting their influences on marine life, ocean temperature, and ocean currents. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans)
    Abstract Data collected by two buoy arrays that operated during the ice seasons of 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 were used to characterize annual cycles of ice motion and deformation in the western Arctic Ocean. An anomalously strong and weak Beaufort Gyre in 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 induced generally anticyclonic and cyclonic sea ice drift during 2014/2015 and 2016/2017, respectively. Cyclonic ice motion resulted in higher contributions of ice divergence to total ice deformation in 2016/2017 than in 2014/2015. In 2014, the autumn ice concentration and multiyear ice coverage were higher than in 2016; consequently, the response of ice motion to wind forcing was weak, and less ice deformation was observed in autumn 2014. During the autumn‐winter transition, the ice‐wind speed ratio, ice deformation rate and its spatial and temporal scaling exponents, and localization of ice deformation decreased markedly in both 2014/2015 and 2016/2017 as a result of freeze‐up and consolidation of ice floes. Such dynamic behavior was maintained through to spring with the further thickening of ice cover. Ice deformation increased due to weakened ice strength as summer approached. The amplitude of the annual cycle of ice deformation rate in the western Arctic Ocean in 2014/2015 and especially in 2016/2017 was larger than that observed during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean (SHEBA) program in 1997/1998. We attribute this phenomenon to ice loss during the recent summers, especially of thick multiyear ice. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, NSF Arctic Data Center)
    This dataset contains the daily Arctic sea ice area (SIA) and sea ice extent (SIE) data for all CMIP6 models and the historical period based on the NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record (CDR) created for Heuzé and Jahn, The first ice-free day in the Arctic Ocean could occur before 2030, accepted, Nature Communications. This is a derived dataset based on publicly available underlying data: - For the CMIP6 data, the SIA and SIE data included here is based on the daily siconc and siconca CMIP6 model output freely available on the CMIP6 data portals (https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/CMIP6/). These pan-Arctic daily SIA and SIE were calculated north of 30N, on each model's native grid, using each models grid area data (areacello or areacella). SIA was defined as sea ice concentration multiplied by the grid cell area and summed over all grid cells. SIE was defined as the sum of the grid cell area for all grid cells where the sea ice concentration was larger than 0.15. All processed SIA and SIE data is included in this dataset, even if the model was later excluded from the analysis for one reason or another (see Heuzé and Jahn 2024, Methods section). All data included has the same number of days as the underlying model. The historical data spans 1980-2014 and can be found in the CMIP6_historical_data.zip file, and the scenario data spans 2015 to the end of the 21st century simulation, for multiple scenarios (SSPs), and can be found in CMIP6_ssp_data.zip. Files are provided as .zip files to make it easy to download all data at once, as the SIA and SIE data is saved in one file per model and ensemble member, and for the scenario simulations, also per ssp. - For the NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record (CDR), the SIA and SIE data included here is based on the NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 4, doi:10.7265/efmz-2t65, Meier et al 2021. The sea ice concentration is multiplied by the grid size of each grid box, for this data, 25x25 kilometers (km) = 625 kilometers squared (km2), and then summed over the full domain. In doing that, we include the interpolated data in the pole hole as included in the sea ice concentration data, but exclude all land/coastal grid points (i.e., values &gt; 2.5 in the underlying data). As the filename indicates, we removed all leap year data from this data (dropped every Feb 29th) so that all years have 365 days. Note that while the file name says this data is for 19790101 to 20231231, it does indeed include 1978 as first year (so 1978-01-01-2023-12-31), with daily data starting on 1978-10-25 (nan before then). We did not change the name of the data file to still allow all archived scripts using this datafile to run. Scripts that work on this data associated with Heuzé and Jahn (2024) can be found at: https://zenodo.org/records/14008665, doi:10.5281/zenodo.14006059 References: Meier, W. N., F. Fetterer, A. K. Windnagel, and S. Stewart. 2021. NOAA/NSIDC Climate Data Record of Passive Microwave Sea Ice Concentration, Version 4. Boulder, Colorado, USA. NSIDC: National Snow and Ice Data Center https://doi.org/10.7265/efmz-2t65 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email