skip to main content


Title: Determining the Timing of Driver Influences on 1.8–3.5 MeV Electron Flux at Geosynchronous Orbit Using ARMAX Methodology and Stepwise Regression
Abstract

Although lagged correlations have suggested influences of solar wind velocity (V) and number density (N), Bz, ultralow frequency (ULF) wave power, and substorms (as measured by the auroral electrojet (AE) index) on MeV electron flux at geosynchronous orbit over an impressive number of hours and days, a satellite's diurnal cycle can inflate correlations, associations between drivers may produce spurious effects, and correlations between all previous time steps may create an appearance of additive influence over many hours. Autoregressive‐moving average transfer function (ARMAX) multiple regressions incorporating previous hours simultaneously can eliminate cycles and assess the impact of parameters, at each hour, while others are controlled. ARMAX influences are an order of magnitude lower than correlations uncorrected for time behavior. Most influence occurs within a few hours, not the many hours suggested by correlation. A log transformation accounts for nonlinearities. Over all hours, solar wind velocity (V) and number density (N) show an initial negative impact, with longer term positive influences over the 9 (V) or 27 (N) hr. Bz is initially a positive influence, with a longer term (6 hr) negative effect. ULF waves impact flux in the first (positive) and second (negative) hour before the flux measurement, with further negative influences in the 12–24 hr before. AE (representing electron injection by substorms) shows only a short term (1 hr) positive influence. However, when only recovery and after‐recovery storm periods are considered (using stepwise regression), there are positive influences of ULF waves, AE, andV, with negative influences ofNand Bz.

 
more » « less
Award ID(s):
2013648
NSF-PAR ID:
10392007
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume:
128
Issue:
1
ISSN:
2169-9380
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The coupling response between solar wind structures and the magnetosphere is highly complex, leading to different effects in the outer radiation belt electron fluxes. Most Coronal Mass Ejections cause strong geomagnetic storms with short recovery phases, often 1–2 days. By contrast, High‐Speed Solar Wind Streams lead to moderate and weak storms often with much longer recovery phases, from several to ∼10 days. The magnetosphere receives energy for a long time under the influence of the HSSs, considerably changing its dynamics. This in turn has an effect on the charged particles trapped in the outer radiation belt. Although the high‐energy electron flux enhancements have received considerable attention, the high‐energy electron flux enhancement pattern (L > 4) has not. This paper identifies 37 events with this enhancement pattern in the high‐energy electron flux during the Van Allen Probes era. We find the enhancements coincident with HSS occurrence. The interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) exhibits north/south Bz fluctuations of Alfvénic nature with moderate amplitudes. The high‐energy electron flux enhancements also correspond to long periods of auroral activity indicating a relationship to magnetotail dynamics. However, the AE index only reaches moderate values. Ultra‐Low Frequency waves were present in all of the events and whistler‐mode chorus waves were present in 89.1% of the events, providing a convenient scenario for wave‐particle interactions. The radial gradient of the ULF wave power related to theL, under the influence of the HSSs, is necessary to trigger the physical processes responsible for this type of high‐energy electron flux enhancement pattern.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Simultaneously cycling space weather parameters may show high correlations even if there is no immediate relationship between them. We successfully remove diurnal cycles using spectral subtraction, and remove both diurnal and longer cycles (e.g., the 27 days solar cycle) with a difference transformation. Other methods of diurnal cycle removal (daily averaging, moving averages [MAs], and simpler spectral subtraction using regression) are less successful at removing cycles. We apply spectral subtraction (a finite impulse response equiripple bandstop filter) to hourly electron flux (Los Alamos National Laboratory satellite data) and a ground‐based ULF index to remove a 24 hr noise signal. This results in smoother time series appropriate for short‐term (approximately < 1 week) correlation and observational studies. However, spectral subtraction may not remove longer cycles such as the 27 days and 11 yr solar cycles. A differencing transformation (ytyt−24) removes not only the 24 hr noise signal but also the 27 days solar cycle, autocorrelation, and longer trends. This results in a low correlation between electron flux and the ULF index over long periods of time (maximum of 0.1). Correlations of electron flux and the ULF index with solar wind velocity (differenced atytyt−1) are also lower than previously reported (≤0.1). An autoregressive, MA transfer function model (ARIMAX) shows that there are significant cumulative effects of solar wind velocity on ULF activity over long periods, but correlations of velocity and ULF waves with flux are only seen over shorter time spans of more homogeneous geomagnetic activity levels.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Many factors influence relativistic outer radiation belt electron fluxes, such as waves in the ultralow frequency (ULF) Pc5, very low frequency (VLF), and electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) frequency bands, seed electron flux, Dst disturbance levels, substorm occurrence, and solar wind inputs. In this work we compared relativistic electron flux poststorm versus prestorm using three methods of analysis: (1) multiple regression to predict flux values following storms, (2) multiple regression to predict the size and direction of the change in electron flux, and (3) multiple logistic regression to predict only the probability of the flux rising or falling. We determined which is the most predictive model and which factors are most influential. We found that a linear regression predicting the difference in prestorm and poststorm flux (Model 2) results in the highest validation correlations. The logistic regression used in Model 3 had slightly weaker predictive abilities than the other two models but had the most value in providing a prediction of the probability of the electron flux increasing after a storm. Of the variables used (ULF Pc5 and VLF, seed electrons, substorm activity, and EMIC waves), the most influential in the final model were ULF Pc5 waves and the seed electrons. IMF Bz, Dst, and solar wind number density, velocity, and pressure did not improve any of the models, and were deemed unnecessary for effective predictions.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    We develop and test an empirical model predicting ground‐based observations of ultralow frequency (ULF, 1–20 mHz) wave power across a range of frequencies, latitudes, and MLT sectors. This is parameterized by instantaneous solar wind speedvsw, variance in proton number density var(Np), and interplanetary southward magnetic fieldBz. A probabilistic model of ULF wave power will allow us to address uncertainty in radial diffusion coefficients and therefore improve diffusion modeling of radial transport in Earth's outer radiation belt. Our model can be used in two ways to reproduce wave power: by sampling from conditional probability distribution functions and by using the mean (expectation) values. We derive a method for testing the quality of the parameterization and test the ability of the model to reproduce ULF wave power time series. Sampling is a better method for reproducing power over an extended time period as it retains the same overall distribution, while mean values are better for predicting the power in a time series. The model predicts each hour in a time series better than the assumption that power persists from the preceding hour. Finally, we review other sources of diffusion coefficient uncertainty. Although this wave model is designed principally for the goal of improved radial diffusion coefficients to include in outer radiation belt diffusion‐based modeling, we anticipate that our model can also be used to investigate the occurrence of ULF waves throughout the magnetosphere and hence the physics of ULF wave generation and propagation.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Characterizing the azimuthal mode number,m, of ultralow‐frequency (ULF) waves is necessary for calculating radial diffusion of radiation belt electrons. A cross‐spectral technique is applied to the compressional Pc5 ULF waves observed by multiple pairs of GOES satellites to estimate the azimuthal mode structure during the 28‐31 May 2010 storm. We find that allowing for both positive and negativemis important to achieve a more realistic distribution of mode numbers and to resolve wave propagation direction. During the storm commencement when the solar wind dynamic pressure is high, ULF wave power is found to dominate at low‐mode numbers. An interesting change of sign inmoccurred around noon, which is consistent with the driving of ULF waves by solar wind buffeting around noon, creating antisunward wave propagation. The low‐mode ULF waves are also found to have a less global coverage in magnetic local time than previously assumed. In contrast, during the storm main phase and early recovery phase when the solar wind dynamic pressure is low and the auroral electrojet index is high, wave power is shown to be distributed over all modes from low to high. The high‐mode waves are found to cover a wider range of magnetic local time than what was previously assumed. Furthermore, to reduce the 2ambiguity in resolvingm, a cross‐pair analysis is performed on satellite field measurements for the first time, which is demonstrated to be effective in generating more reliable mode structure of ULF waves during high auroral electrojet periods.

     
    more » « less