skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Toward Fully Autonomous Seismic Networks: Backprojecting Deep Learning-Based Phase Time Functions for Earthquake Monitoring on Continuous Recordings
Abstract Accurate and (near) real-time earthquake monitoring provides the spatial and temporal behaviors of earthquakes for understanding the nature of earthquakes, and also helps in regional seismic hazard assessments and mitigations. Because of the increase in both the quality and quantity of seismic data, an automated earthquake monitoring system is needed. Most of the traditional methods for detecting earthquake signals and picking phases are based on analyses of features in recordings of an individual earthquake and/or their differences from background noises. When seismicity is high, the seismograms are complicated, and, therefore, traditional analysis methods often fail. With the development of machine learning algorithms, earthquake signal detection and seismic phase picking can be more accurate using the features obtained from a large amount of earthquake recordings. We have developed an attention recurrent residual U-Net algorithm, and used data augmentation techniques to improve the accuracy of earthquake detection and seismic phase picking on complex seismograms that record multiple earthquakes. The use of probability functions of P and S arrivals and potential P and S arrival pairs of earthquakes can increase the computational efficiency and accuracy of backprojection for earthquake monitoring in large areas. We applied our workflow to monitor the earthquake activity in southern California during the 2019 Ridgecrest sequence. The distribution of earthquakes determined by our method is consistent with that in the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC) catalog. In addition, the number of earthquakes in our catalog is more than three times that of the SCEDC catalog. Our method identifies additional earthquakes that are close in origin times and/or locations, and are not included in the SCEDC catalog. Our algorithm avoids misidentification of seismic phases for earthquake location. In general, our algorithm can provide reliable earthquake monitoring on a large area, even during a high seismicity period.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1725729
PAR ID:
10396307
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Seismological Research Letters
Volume:
93
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0895-0695
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1880 to 1894
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Seismograms are convolution results between seismic sources and the media that seismic waves propagate through, and, therefore, the primary observations for studying seismic source parameters and the Earth interior. The routine earthquake location and travel-time tomography rely on accurate seismic phase picks (e.g., P and S arrivals). As data increase, reliable automated seismic phase-picking methods are needed to analyze data and provide timely earthquake information. However, most traditional autopickers suffer from low signal-to-noise ratio and usually require additional efforts to tune hyperparameters for each case. In this study, we proposed a deep-learning approach that adapted soft attention gates (AGs) and recurrent-residual convolution units (RRCUs) into the backbone U-Net for seismic phase picking. The attention mechanism was implemented to suppress responses from waveforms irrelevant to seismic phases, and the cooperating RRCUs further enhanced temporal connections of seismograms at multiple scales. We used numerous earthquake recordings in Taiwan with diverse focal mechanisms, wide depth, and magnitude distributions, to train and test our model. Setting the picking errors within 0.1 s and predicted probability over 0.5, the AG with recurrent-residual convolution unit (ARRU) phase picker achieved the F1 score of 98.62% for P arrivals and 95.16% for S arrivals, and picking rates were 96.72% for P waves and 90.07% for S waves. The ARRU phase picker also shown a great generalization capability, when handling unseen data. When applied the model trained with Taiwan data to the southern California data, the ARRU phase picker shown no cognitive downgrade. Comparing with manual picks, the arrival times determined by the ARRU phase picker shown a higher consistency, which had been evaluated by a set of repeating earthquakes. The arrival picks with less human error could benefit studies, such as earthquake location and seismic tomography. 
    more » « less
  2. The potential relationship between surface creep and deeper geological processes is unclear, even on one of the world’s best-studied faults. From June to August 2021, a large creep event with surface slip of more than 16 mm was recorded on the Calaveras fault in California, part of the San Andreas fault system. This event initially appeared to be accompanied by along-fault migration of seismicity, suggesting it penetrated to depth. Other studies have suggested that surface creep events are likely a shallow feature, unrelated to deep seismicity. To provide more detail on the relationship between earthquakes, surface creep, and potential aseismic slip at seismogenic depth, we tripled the number of earthquakes in the Northern California Earthquake Catalog in the region of the creep event for all of 2021. This was accomplished by implementing earthquake detection techniques based on both template matching (EQCorrscan) and AI-based automatic earthquake phase picking (PhaseNet). After manual inspection, the detected earthquakes were first located using Hypoinverse and subsequently relocated via GrowClust. Our enhanced catalog indicates that the spatiotemporal pattern of earthquakes here is not strongly influenced by the creep event and is better explained by structural heterogeneity than transient stress changes, indicating a decoupling of seismicity rate and surficial creep on this major fault. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Seismicity at restless volcanoes commonly features a variety of signal types reflecting both volcanotectonic and fluid-driven source processes. However, traditional catalogs of seismicity are often incomplete, especially concerning events with emergent onsets such as those driven by the dynamics of magmatic and hydrothermal fluids. The detection of all discrete events and continuous seismic tremors, regardless of the underlying source processes, would therefore improve the ability of monitoring agencies to forecast eruptions and mitigate their associated hazards. We present a workflow for generalized detection of seismic events based on the network covariance matrix (Seydoux et al., 2016). Our contributions enable the method to simultaneously detect continuous and short-duration (<∼10 s) events, provide information about the frequency content of the signals, and to refine the initial detection times by an order of magnitude (from window lengths of 75 to 7.5 s). We test the workflow on a 15-month record of seismicity with 23 stations at Mammoth Mountain, California (July 2012–October 2013) and detect 62% of long-period events and 94% of volcanotectonic events in the existing Northern California Earthquake Data Center catalog. In addition, ∼3000 events are not included in the catalog, and thousands of tremor signals are found. The method is suitable for near-real-time analysis of continuous waveforms and can provide a valuable supplement to existing algorithms to improve the completeness of catalogs used for monitoring volcanoes. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT Rapid association of seismic phases and event location are crucial for real‐time seismic monitoring. We propose a new method, named rapid earthquake association and location (REAL), for associating seismic phases and locating seismic events rapidly, simultaneously, and automatically. REAL combines the advantages of both pick‐based and waveform‐based detection and location methods. It associates arrivals of different seismic phases and locates seismic events primarily through counting the number of P and S picks and secondarily from travel‐time residuals. A group of picks are associated with a particular earthquake if there are enough picks within the theoretical travel‐time windows. The location is determined to be at the grid point with the most picks, and if multiple locations have the same maximum number of picks, the grid point among them with smallest travel‐time residuals. We refine seismic locations using a least‐squares location method (VELEST) and a high‐precision relative location method (hypoDD). REAL can be used for rapid seismic characterization due to its computational efficiency. As an example application, we apply REAL to earthquakes in the 2016 central Apennines, Italy, earthquake sequence occurring during a five‐day period in October 2016, midway in time between the two largest earthquakes. We associate and locate more than three times as many events (3341) as are in Italy's National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology routine catalog (862). The spatial distribution of these relocated earthquakes shows a similar but more concentrated pattern relative to the cataloged events. Our study demonstrates that it is possible to characterize seismicity automatically and quickly using REAL and seismic picks. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract I present a high-precision earthquake relocation catalog and first-motion focal mechanisms before and during the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence in eastern California. I obtain phase arrivals, first-motion polarities, and waveform data from the Southern California Earthquake Data Center for more than 24,000 earthquakes with the magnitudes varying between −0.7 and 7.1 from 1 January to 31 July 2019. I first relocate all the earthquakes using phase arrivals through a previously developed 3D seismic-velocity model and then improve relative location accuracies using differential times from waveform cross correlation. The majority of the relocated seismicity is distributed above 12 km depth. The seismicity migration along the northwest–southeast direction can be clearly seen with an aseismic zone near the Coso volcanic field. Focal mechanisms are solved for all the relocated events based on the first-motion polarity data with dominant strike-slip fault solutions. The Mw 6.4 and 7.1 earthquakes are positioned at 12.45 and 4.16 km depths after the 3D relocation, respectively, with strike-slip focal solutions. These results can help our understanding of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence and can be used in other seismological and geophysical studies. 
    more » « less