An official website of the United States government
Abstract. Streamflow, or discharge, is an essential measure in the study of rivers and streams. However, quantifying continuous discharge can be difficult, especially for nascent monitoring efforts, due to the challenges of establishing gauging locations, sensor protocols, and installations. Here, we investigate the potential for both simple and complex models to accurately estimate continuous discharge (at least daily estimates), using only discrete manual measurements of streamflow. We were inspired to do this work because some continuous discharge series generated by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) during its pre- and early-operational phases (2015–present) are marked by anomalous data due to sensor drift, gauge movement, and incomplete rating curves. Using field-measured discharge as truth, we reconstructed continuous discharge for all 27 NEON stream gauges over this period via linear regression on nearby donor gauges and/or prediction from neural networks trained on a large corpus of established gauge data. Top reconstructions achieved median efficiencies of 0.83 (Nash-Sutcliffe, or NSE) and 0.81 (Kling-Gupta, or KGE) across all sites, and improved KGE at 11 sites versus published data. Estimates from this analysis inform ~199 site-months of missing data in the official record, and can be used jointly with NEON data to enhance the descriptive and predictive value of NEON’s stream data products. We provide 5-minute composite discharge series for each site that combine the best estimates across modeling approaches and NEON’s published data.
more »
« less
User-focused evaluation of National Ecological Observatory Network streamflow estimates
Abstract Accurately estimating stream discharge is crucial for many ecological, biogeochemical, and hydrologic analyses. As of September 2022, The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) provided up to 5 years of continuous discharge estimates at 28 streams across the United States. NEON created rating curves at each site in a Bayesian framework, parameterized using hydraulic controls and manual measurements of discharge. Here we evaluate the reliability of these discharge estimates with three approaches. We (1) compared predicted to observed discharge, (2) compared predicted to observed stage, and (3) calculated the proportion of discharge estimates extrapolated beyond field measurements. We considered 1,523 site-months of continuous streamflow predictions published by NEON. Of these, 39% met our highest quality criteria, 11% fell into an intermediate classification, and 50% of site-months were classified as unreliable. We provided diagnostic metrics and categorical evaluations of continuous discharge and stage estimates by month for each site, enabling users to rapidly query for suitable NEON data.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10396570
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Publishing Group
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Scientific Data
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2052-4463
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract. Quantifying continuous discharge can be difficult, especially for nascent monitoring efforts, due to the challenges of establishing gauging locations, sensor protocols, and installations. Some continuous discharge series generated by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) during its pre- and early-operational phases (2015–present) are marked by anomalies related to sensor drift, gauge movement, and incomplete rating curves. Here, we investigate the potential to estimate continuous discharge when discrete streamflow measurements are available at the site of interest. Using field-measured discharge as truth, we reconstructed continuous discharge for all 27 NEON stream gauges via linear regression on nearby donor gauges and/or prediction from neural networks trained on a large corpus of established gauge data. Reconstructions achieved median efficiencies of 0.83 (Nash–Sutcliffe, or NSE) and 0.81 (Kling–Gupta, or KGE) across all sites and improved KGE at 11 sites versus published data, with linear regression generally outperforming deep learning approaches due to the use of target site data for model fitting rather than evaluation only. Estimates from this analysis inform ∼199 site-months of missing data in the official record, and can be used jointly with NEON data to enhance the descriptive and predictive value of NEON's stream data products. We provide 5 min composite discharge series for each site that combine the best estimates across modeling approaches and NEON's published data. The success of this effort demonstrates the potential to establish “virtual gauges”, sites at which continuous streamflow can be accurately estimated from discrete measurements, by transferring information from nearby donor gauges and/or large collections of training data.more » « less
-
This dataset contains estimates of gas exchange velocity, gas exchange rate, and hydraulic parameters for streams calculated from tracer-gas experiments and conservative tracer injections collected by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). All input data were collected by NEON and is available on the NEON data portal at https://data.neonscience.org. Specifically, the NEON Reaeration field and lab collection data product (DP1.20190.001) was used to calculate these estimates. Gas exchange was estimated in two ways: first, following an unpooled frequentist approach and second, following a partially pooled Bayesian approach. In addition, a salt-correction was applied to gas exchange estimates for sites where it was possible and necessary. All estimates of gas exchange are included in the file gasExchange_ds.csv. A recommended selection of these estimates is included in the dataset (best_k600_mPerDay and best_K600_mPerDay). The stanfit objects used for the partially pooled Bayesian approach are also included as site-specific model objects for gas exchange velocities and rates. In addition, water velocity was calculated from conservative tracer injections, and mean water depth was calculated from these water velocity estimates and measurements of wetted width and water discharge. All hydraulic parameters are included in the file hydraulics_ds.csv. All processing code is available in the reaRates R package. NEON is sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF) and operated under cooperative agreement by Battelle. This material is based in part upon work supported by NSF through the NEON Program.more » « less
-
Abstract Accurate quantification of soil carbon fluxes is essential to reduce uncertainty in estimates of the terrestrial carbon sink. However, these fluxes vary over time and across ecosystem types and so, it can be difficult to estimate them accurately across large scales. The flux‐gradient method estimates soil carbon fluxes using co‐located measurements of soil CO2concentration, soil temperature, soil moisture and other soil properties. The National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) provides such data across 20 ecoclimatic domains spanning the continental U.S., Puerto Rico, Alaska and Hawai‘i.We present an R software package (neonSoilFlux) that acquires soil environmental data to compute half‐hourly soil carbon fluxes for each soil replicate plot at a given terrestrial NEON site. To assess the computed fluxes, we visited six focal NEON sites and measured soil carbon fluxes using a closed‐dynamic chamber approach.Outputs from theneonSoilFluxshowed agreement with measured fluxes (R2between measured andneonSoilFluxoutputs ranging from 0.12 to 0.77 depending on calculation method used); measured outputs generally fell within the range of calculated uncertainties from the gradient method. Calculated fluxes fromneonSoilFluxaggregated to the daily scale exhibited expected site‐specific seasonal patterns.While the flux‐gradient method is broadly effective, its accuracy is highly sensitive to site‐specific inputs, including the extent to which gap‐filing techniques are used to interpolate missing sensor data and to estimates of soil diffusivity and moisture content. Future refinement and validation ofneonSoilFluxoutputs can contribute to existing databases of soil carbon flux measurements, providing near real‐time estimates of a critical component of the terrestrial carbon cycle.more » « less
-
Abstract The Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) satellite has the potential to transform global hydrologic science by offering simultaneous and synoptic estimates of river discharge and other hydraulic variables. Discharge is estimated from SWOT observations of water surface elevation, width, and slope. A first assessment using just the highest quality SWOT measurements, over the first 15 months (March 2023–July 2024) of the mission evaluated at 65 gauged reaches shows results consistent with pre‐launch expectations. SWOT estimates track discharge dynamics without relying on any gauge information: median correlation is 0.73, with a correlation interquartile range of 0.51–0.89. SWOT estimates capture discharge magnitude correctly in some cases but are biased (median bias is 50%) in others. There are already a total of 11,274 ungauged global locations with highest quality SWOT measurements where SWOT discharge is expected to accurately track discharge variations: this value will increase as SWOT data record length grows, algorithms are refined and SWOT measurements are reprocessed. This first look indicates that SWOT discharge is performing as expected for SWOT data that achieve performance requirements, providing observed information on discharge variations in ungauged basins globally.more » « less
