An official website of the United States government
A complex is assembled which pairs a carboxyl group of X 1 COOH with a 1,2,5-chalcogenadiazole ring containing substituents on its C atoms. The OH of the carboxyl group donates a proton to a N atom of the ring to form a OH⋯N H-bond (HB), while its carbonyl O engages in a Y⋯O chalcogen bond (ChB) with the ring in which Y = S, Se, Te. The ChB is strengthened by enlarging the size of the Y atom from S to Se to Te. Placement of an electron-withdrawing group (EWG) X 1 on the acid strengthens the HB while weakening the ChB; the reverse occurs when EWGs are placed on the ring. By selection of the proper substituents on the two units, it is possible to achieve a near perfect balance between the strengths of these two bonds. These bond strengths are also reflected in the NMR spectroscopic properties of the chemical shielding of the various atoms and the coupling between the nuclei directly involved in each bond.
more »
« less
Competition Between the Two σ‐Holes in the Formation of a Chalcogen Bond
Abstract A chalcogen atom Y contains two separate σ‐holes when in a R1YR2molecular bonding pattern. Quantum chemical calculations consider competition between these two σ‐holes to engage in a chalcogen bond (ChB) with a NH3base. R groups considered include F, Br, I, and tert‐butyl (tBu). Also examined is the situation where the Y lies within a chalcogenazole ring, where its neighbors are C and N. Both electron‐withdrawing substituents R1and R2act cooperatively to deepen the two σ‐holes, but the deeper of the two holes consistently lies opposite to the more electron‐withdrawing group, and is also favored to form a stronger ChB. The formation of two simultaneous ChBs in a triad requires the Y atom to act as double electron acceptor, and so anti‐cooperativity weakens each bond relative to the simple dyad. This effect is such that some of the shallower σ‐holes are unable to form a ChB at all when a base occupies the other site.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1954310
- PAR ID:
- 10419305
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- ChemPhysChem
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 9
- ISSN:
- 1439-4235
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Non‐covalent chalcogen bond (ChB) interactions have found utility in many fields, including catalysis, organic semiconductors, and crystal engineering. In this study, the transition stabilizing effects of ChB interactions of oxygen and sulfur were experimentally measured using a series of molecular rotors. The rotors were designed to form ChB interactions in their bond rotation transition states. This enabled the kinetic influences to be assessed by monitoring changes in the rotational barriers. Despite forming weaker ChB interactions, the smaller chalcogens were able to stabilize transition states and had measurable kinetic effects on the rotational barriers. Sulfur stabilized the bond rotation transition state by as much as −7.2 kcal/mol without electron‐withdrawing groups. The key was to design a system where the sulfur ‐hole was aligned with the lone pairs of the chalcogen bond acceptor. Oxygen rotors also could form transition state stabilizing ChB interactions but required electron‐withdrawing groups. For both oxygen and sulfur ChB interactions, a strong correlation was observed between transition state stabilizing abilities and electrostatic potential (ESP) of the chalcogen, providing a useful predictive parameter for the rational design of future ChB systems.more » « less
-
Type I and II halogen bonds are well-recognized motifs that commonly occur within crystals. Quantum calculations are applied to examine whether such geometries might occur in their closely related chalcogen bond cousins. Homodimers are constructed of the R1R2C=Y and R1R2Y monomers, wherein Y represents a chalcogen atom, S, Se, or Te; R1 and R2 refer to either H or F. A Type II (T2) geometry wherein the lone pair of one Y is closely aligned with a σ-hole of its partner represents a stable arrangement for all except YH2, although not all such structures are true minima. The symmetric T1 geometry in which each Y atom serves as both electron donor and acceptor in the chalcogen bond is slightly higher in energy for R1R2C=Y, but the reverse is true for R1R2Y. Due to their deeper σ-holes, the latter molecules engage in stronger chalcogen bonds than do the former, with the exception of H2Y, whose dimers are barely bound. The interaction energies rise as the Y atom grows larger: S < Se < Te.more » « less
-
This article reviews the history and the current state of knowledge concerning the ability of the heavy chalcogen atoms S and Se, and to some extent Te, to participate in a H-bond as either proton donor or acceptor. These atoms are nearly as effective proton acceptors as O, and only slightly weaker as donor. They can also participate in chalcogen bonds where they act as electron acceptors from a nucleophile. These bonds rapidly strengthen as the chalcogen atom becomes larger: S < Se < Te, or if they are surrounded by electron-withdrawing substituents, and can exceed that of many types of H-bonds. Experimental and computational evidence indicates that both H-bonds and chalcogen bonds involving S and Se occur widely in chemical and biological systems, and play an active role in structure and function.more » « less
-
Abstract The lone pair of the N atom is a common electron donor in noncovalent bonds. Quantum calculations examine how various aspects of the base on which the N is located affect the strength and other properties of complexes formed with Lewis acids FH, FBr, F2Se, and F3As that respectively encompass hydrogen, halogen, chalcogen, and pnicogen bonds. In most cases the halogen bond is the strongest, followed in order by chalcogen, hydrogen, and pnicogen. The noncovalent bond strength increases in the sp23order of hybridization of N. Replacement of H substituents on the base by a methyl group or substituting N by C atom to which the base N is attached, strengthens the bond. The strongest bonds occur for trimethylamine and the weakest for N2.more » « less
