An official website of the United States government
Abstract Methane (CH4) is a potent greenhouse gas with a warming potential 84 times that of carbon dioxide (CO2) over a 20‐year period. Atmospheric CH4concentrations have been rising since the nineteenth century but the cause of large increases post‐2007 is disputed. Tropical wetlands are thought to account for ∼20% of global CH4emissions, but African tropical wetlands are understudied and their contribution is uncertain. In this work, we use the first airborne measurements of CH4sampled over three wetland areas in Zambia to derive emission fluxes. Three independent approaches to flux quantification from airborne measurements were used: Airborne mass balance, airborne eddy‐covariance, and an atmospheric inversion. Measured emissions (ranging from 5 to 28 mg m−2 hr−1) were found to be an order of magnitude greater than those simulated by land surface models (ranging from 0.6 to 3.9 mg m−2hr−1), suggesting much greater emissions from tropical wetlands than currently accounted for. The prevalence of such underestimated CH4sources may necessitate additional reductions in anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to keep global warming below a threshold of 2°C above preindustrial levels.
more »
« less
Improved global wetland carbon isotopic signatures support post-2006 microbial methane emission increase
Abstract Atmospheric concentrations of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, have strongly increased since 2007. Measurements of stable carbon isotopes of methane can constrain emissions if the isotopic compositions are known; however, isotopic compositions of methane emissions from wetlands are poorly constrained despite their importance. Here, we use a process-based biogeochemistry model to calculate the stable carbon isotopic composition of global wetland methane emissions. We estimate a mean global signature of −61.3 ± 0.7‰ and find that tropical wetland emissions are enriched by ~11‰ relative to boreal wetlands. Our model shows improved resolution of regional, latitudinal and global variations in isotopic composition of wetland emissions. Atmospheric simulation scenarios with the improved wetland isotopic composition suggest that increases in atmospheric methane since 2007 are attributable to rising microbial emissions. Our findings substantially reduce uncertainty in the stable carbon isotopic composition of methane emissions from wetlands and improve understanding of the global methane budget.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10420530
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Communications Earth & Environment
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 2662-4435
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Atmospheric methane levels were nearly steady between 1999 and 2006, but have been rising since then. Increases in wetland emissions, the largest natural global CH4 source, may be partly responsible. Tropical regions like Amazonia, host some of the largest wetlands on Earth, but there are few in-situ observations, which allow large-scale flux estimation. To improve estimates of its contribution to the global CH4 budget we measured 590 lower-troposphere methane concentrations vertical profiles at four Amazonian sites between 2010 and 2018. We estimate that Amazonia emits 46.2±10.3 TgCH4 y-1 (~8% of global emissions) with no emission trend. Non-fire sources (mainly wetlands) dominate emissions, with a smaller biomass burning contribution (~17%). We find a distinct east-west contrast with an emission peak in the northeast. Furthermore, while northwest-central Amazon emissions are nearly aseasonal, consistent with weak precipitation seasonality, southern emissions are strongly seasonal synchronously with equivalent water thickness seasonality.more » « less
-
Abstract Tropical wetlands and freshwaters are major contributors to the growing atmospheric methane (CH4) burden. Extensive peatland drainage has lowered CH4emissions from peat soils in Southeast Asia, but the canals draining these peatlands may be hotspots of CH4emissions. Alternatively, CH4oxidation (consumption) by methanotrophic microorganisms may attenuate emissions. Here, we used laboratory experiments and a synoptic survey of the isotopic composition of CH4in 34 canals across West Kalimantan, Indonesia to quantify the proportion of CH4that is consumed and therefore not emitted to the atmosphere. We find that CH4oxidation mitigates 76.4 ± 12.0% of potential canal emissions, reducing emissions by ~70 mg CH4m−2d−1. Methane consumption also significantly impacts the stable isotopic fingerprint of canal CH4emissions. As canals drain over 65% of peatlands in Southeast Asia, our results suggest that CH4oxidation significantly influences landscape-scale CH4emissions from these ecosystems.more » « less
-
ABSTRACT Methane emissions by global wetlands are anticipated to increase due to climate warming. The increase in methane represents a sizable emissions source (32–68 Tg CH4year−1greater in 2099 than 2010, for RCP2.6–4.5) that threatens long‐term climate stability and poses a significant positive feedback that magnifies climate warming. However, management of this feedback, which is ultimately driven by human‐caused warming and thus “indirectly” anthropogenic, has been largely unexplored. Here, we review the known range of options for direct management of rising wetland methane emissions, outline contexts for their application, and explore a global scale thought experiment to gauge their potential impact. Among potential management options for methane emissions from wetlands, substrate amendments, particularly sulfate, are the most well studied, although the majority have only been tested in laboratory settings and without considering potential environmental externalities. Using published models, we find that the bulk (64%–80%) of additional wetland methane will arise from hotspots making up only about 8% of global wetland extent, primarily occurring in the tropics and subtropics. If applied to these hotspots, sulfate might suppress 10%–21% of the total additional wetland methane emissions, but this treatment comes with considerable negative consequences for the environment. This thought experiment leverages results from experimental simulations of sulfate from acid rain, as there is essentially no research on the use of sulfate for intentional suppression of additional wetland methane emissions. Given the magnitude of the potential climate forcing feedback of methane from wetlands, it is critical to explore management options and their impacts to ensure that decisions made to directly manage—or not manage—this process be made with the best available science.more » « less
-
We investigated the climatic and ecohydrological controls of the monthly methane emission fluxes from freshwater wetlands across the globe. Fluxes of methane, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), soil temperature (TS), atmospheric pressure, latent heat flux (LE), wind speed (WS), friction velocity, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), soil water content (SWC), water table depth, and precipitation were obtained from 32 FLUXNET wetland sites. Multivariate pattern recognition techniques of principal component and factor analyses were utilized to classify and group climatic and ecological variables based on their similarity as drivers, examining their interrelation patterns across the different sites. Partial least squares regression models were developed to estimate the relative linkages of methane emission fluxes with the climatic and ecohydrological drivers. When the wetlands were flooded (i.e., positive water table depth relative to the ground), PAR, LE, VPD, and TS had the strongest controls on the methane emission fluxes. However, in the absence of flooding (i.e., negative water table depth), the methane emission fluxes were mainly controlled by SWC and WS. For the wetland sites with unavailable water table depth data, PAR, TS, and WS had the strongest controls on the methane emissions and subsequent transport. Our findings provided important knowledge and insights for predicting and managing methane emissions in freshwater wetlands at a global scale.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00488-5
