More Like this

1. Under pressure: the interaction between high-stakes contexts and individual differences in decision-making in humans and non-human species

   https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-023-01768-z  

   Sosnowski, Meghan J.; Brosnan, Sarah F. (March 2023, Animal Cognition)

   Abstract Observed behavior can be the result of complex cognitive processes that are influenced by environmental factors, physiological process, and situational features. Pressure, a feature of a situation in which an individual’s outcome is impacted by his or her own ability to perform, has been traditionally treated as a human-specific phenomenon and only recently have pressure-related deficits been considered in relation to other species. However, there are strong similarities in biological and cognitive systems among mammals (and beyond), and high-pressure situations are at least theoretically common in the wild. We hypothesize that other species are sensitive to pressure and that we can learn about the evolutionary trajectory of pressure responses by manipulating pressure experimentally in these other species. Recent literature indicates that, as in humans, pressure influences responses in non-human primates, with either deficits in ability to perform (“choking”) or an ability to thrive when the stakes are high. Here, we synthesize the work to date on performance under pressure in humans and how hormones might be related to individual differences in responses. Then, we discuss why we would expect to see similar effects of pressure in non-humans and highlight the existing evidence for how other species respond. We argue that evidence suggests that other species respond to high-pressure contexts in similar ways as humans, and that responses to pressure are a critical missing piece of our understanding of cognition in human and non-human animals. Understanding pressure’s effects could provide insight into individual variation in decision-making in comparative cognition and the evolution of human decision-making. 

   more » « less
2. Familiarity, Active Memory And Pressure During A Delayed Matching-To-Sample Task In Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] Apella)

   https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.12.01.02.2025  

   Sosnowski, Meghan; Brosnan, Sarah (February 2025, Animal Behavior and Cognition)

   Delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) tasks are commonly used in the field of comparative cognition to study memory, including working memory. However, specific task demands vary across studies and species, and as such, DMTS tasks may engage different memory systems when features such as the available stimulus pool differ. Further, individual or species-wide differences in response to pressure to perform may increase variation within a species. We explored how task features, memory systems, and pressure interact in tufted capuchin monkeys (Sapajus [Cebus] apella) to influence performance on a DTMS task by varying the size of the possible stimulus pool across testing blocks. We also varied the amount of pressure within a testing block by training monkeys to associate a background color change with a more difficult, but more highly rewarded, trial, as we had done in previous work. In accordance with previous literature (Basile & Hampton, 2013), we found that performance greatly decreased when the possible stimulus pool was limited as compared to a large possible stimulus pool, likely because monkeys could not rely on passive familiarity memory to complete the task. However, we found no overall species tendency to fail under pressure in either the limited- or large-set conditions; instead, we found a surprising tendency to thrive under higher pressure. Taken together, our results further highlight the importance of considering DMTS task features when studying specific memory systems in non-human species and suggest that the DTMS task might not be the best paradigm for testing pressure effects without consideration of individual differences. 

   more » « less
3. Sensory prosthetics - clinical and scientific utility of a vestibular implant

   Haburcakova, C.; Merfeld, D.; Gong, W.; Guinand, N.; Perez, Fornos A.; Thompson, L.A.; Guyot, J.P.; Lewis, R.F. (April 2017, Neurology)

   Objective: To determine if a vestibular prosthesis could improve function in subjects with severe vestibular damage and could be used it as a scientific tool to investigate central vestibular processing. Background: Damage to the vestibular labyrinth is common and usually permanent. We therefore developed and tested a vestibular implant (VI) that is designed to mimic the information normally provided by the vestibular labyrinth to determine if we can reduce vestibular-mediated deficits and study temporal integration of sensory cues in the brain. Design/Methods: Monkeys had electrodes implanted in the semicircular canals of one ear and then severe bilateral vestibular damage was induced with aminoglycosides. Eye movements, perception, and balance were tested before and after vestibular damage and with the VI activated, which supplied head motion information to the brain via electrical stimulation delivered by the implanted electrodes. Humans also had electrode implantation (done in conjunction with a cochlear implant, CI) and they were tested on a temporal binding psychophysical task Results: Stimulation provided by VI in vestibulopathic monkeys improved their balance, perception of spatial orientation, and eye movement responses. Timing experiments in humans using CI and VI stimuli showed that unlike past experiments that used motion to generate the vestibular signal, CI and VI signals were received by the cerebral cortex with the same latency and were perceived as simultaneous, but this timing perception was highly sensitive to adaption. Conclusions: VI improves oculomotor, postural, and perceptual behavior in vestibulopathic monkeys and could prove to be an effective way to improve these functions in patients with permanent labyrinthine damage. Timing experiments show that when novel stimuli are used, the brain synthesizes them in accordance with their arrival at the cortex, but that experience can rapidly recalibrate this timing relationship, which may be why normal stimuli that are experienced habitually lack this characteristic. 

   more » « less
4. The mediating role of attention in the association between math anxiety and math performance: An eye-tracking study

   https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000759  

   Li, Tianyu; Quintero, Michaela; Galvan, Michael; Shanafelt, Sierra; Hasty, Leslie M; Spangler, Derek P.; Lyons, Ian M.; Mazzocco, Michèle M.; Brockmole, James R.; Hart, Sara A.; et al (July 2022, Journal of educational psychology)

   Math anxiety (MA) and math performance are generally negatively correlated (Barroso et al., 2020; Namkung et al., 2019). However, the mechanisms underlying this negative association remain unclear. According to the Attentional Control Theory (ACT; Eysenck, et al., 2007), anxious individuals experience impaired attentional control during problem solving, which compromises their performance on cognitive tasks. In a sample of 168 elementary and middle school students, the current study used an eye-tracking approach to investigate whether math-anxious students exhibit deficits in their attentional control during a math problem solving task, and whether such attentional control deficits account for the negative association between MA and performance on this math task. Consistent with the ACT, we found that students with higher MA were more likely to engage attention to both task-relevant and task-irrelevant distractors during problem solving, and their enhanced attention to these distractors was associated with their impaired performance on the math task. These findings suggest that the MA-related math performance deficit is partly mediated by impaired attentional control, which is indicated by the maladaptive attentional bias toward distracting information during math problem solving. 

   more » « less
5. Investigating the perception of risks during arboreal locomotion in wild and captive primates

   Schapker, Nicole M; Myers, Lydia C; Janisch, Judith; Matar, Ahmad; Pham, Julie; Miller, Aidan; Boghdady, Abdelrahman; Shapiro, Liza J; Young, Jesse W (March 2025, American Journal of Biological Anthropology)

   Much research on primate locomotor performance in arboreal settings focuses on how primate morphology allows them to navigate substrates that vary in diameter, orientation, and compliance. However, little prior research has considered how these and other environmental factors - such as substrate height and light availability - may also affect locomotor behavior by altering how risky a given substrate is perceived to be. To investigate the relationship between risk perception and locomotor performance, we video-recorded four species of wild lemur (Ranomafana National Park), three species of wild cercopithecoid monkeys (Kibale National Park), and four species of captive lemur (Duke Lemur Center). We test the general hypothesis that primates should change their gaits and engage in exploratory behaviors – using touch and sight as guides – to increase stability in precarious settings. Augmenting our prior study showing that some lemurs change their locomotion when moving high in the canopy, we present new data showing that wild lemurs and monkeys frequently cross gaps between substrates and transition between locomotor modes without pause. In the investigation on captive lemurs, we examine whether variations in branch diameter, compliance, orientation, and light availability influence the paths lemurs choose to take. Preliminary results suggest that lemurs tend to avoid the most precarious substrates (i.e., the most narrow and compliant) regardless of lighting conditions. Overall, this research indicates that primates are able to make quick and accurate judgements about locomotor safety in the context of ongoing arboreal locomotion. 

   more » « less