An official website of the United States government
The transferability of adversarial examples is of central importance to transfer-based black-box adversarial attacks. Previous works for generating transferable adversarial examples focus on attacking given pretrained surrogate models while the connections between surrogate models and adversarial trasferability have been overlooked. In this paper, we propose Lipschitz Regularized Surrogate (LRS) for transfer-based black-box attacks, a novel approach that transforms surrogate models towards favorable adversarial transferability. Using such transformed surrogate models, any existing transfer-based black-box attack can run without any change, yet achieving much better performance. Specifically, we impose Lipschitz regularization on the loss landscape of surrogate models to enable a smoother and more controlled optimization process for generating more transferable adversarial examples. In addition, this paper also sheds light on the connection between the inner properties of surrogate models and adversarial transferability, where three factors are identified: smaller local Lipschitz constant, smoother loss landscape, and stronger adversarial robustness. We evaluate our proposed LRS approach by attacking state-of-the-art standard deep neural networks and defense models. The results demonstrate significant improvement on the attack success rates and transferability. Our code is available at https://github.com/TrustAIoT/LRS.
more »
« less
Robustify ML-Based Lithography Hotspot Detectors
Deep learning has been widely applied in various VLSI design automation tasks, from layout quality estimation to design optimization. Though deep learning has shown state-of-the-art performance in several applications, recent studies reveal that deep neural networks exhibit intrinsic vulnerability to adversarial perturbations, which pose risks in the ML-aided VLSI design flow. One of the most effective strategies to improve robustness is regularization approaches, which adjust the optimization objective to make the deep neural network generalize better. In this paper, we examine several adversarial defense methods to improve the robustness of ML-based lithography hotspot detectors. We present an innovative design rule checking (DRC)-guided curvature regularization (CURE) approach, which is customized to robustify ML-based lithography hotspot detectors against white-box attacks. Our approach allows for improvements in both the robustness and the accuracy of the model. Experiments show that the model optimized by DRC-guided CURE achieves the highest robustness and accuracy compared with those trained using the baseline defense methods. Compared with the vanilla model, DRC-guided CURE decreases the average attack success rate by 53.9% and increases the average ROC-AUC by 12.1%. Compared with the best of the defense baselines, DRC-guided CURE reduces the average attack success rate by 18.6% and improves the average ROC-AUC by 4.3%.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2106828
- PAR ID:
- 10435301
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference On Computer Aided Design (ICCAD)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 7
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Several attacks have been proposed against autonomous vehicles and their subsystems that are powered by machine learning (ML). Road sign recognition models are especially heavily tested under various adversarial ML attack settings, and they have proven to be vulnerable. Despite the increasing research on adversarial ML attacks against road sign recognition models, there is little to no focus on defending against these attacks. In this paper, we propose the first defense method specifically designed for autonomous vehicles to detect adversarial ML attacks targeting road sign recognition models, which is called ViLAS (Vision-Language Model for Adversarial Traffic Sign Detection). The proposed defense method is based on a custom, fast, lightweight, and salable vision-language model (VLM) and is compatible with any existing traffic sign recognition system. Thanks to the orthogonal information coming from the class label text data through the language model, ViLAS leverages image context in addition to visual data for highly effective attack detection performance. In our extensive experiments, we show that our method consistently detects various attacks against different target models with high true positive rates while satisfying very low false positive rates. When tested against four state-of-the-art attacks targeting four popular action recognition models, our proposed detector achieves an average AUC of 0.94. This result achieves a 25.3% improvement over a state-of-the-art defense method proposed for generic image attack detection, which attains an average AUC of 0.75. We also show that our custom VLM is more suitable for an autonomous vehicle compared to the popular off-the-shelf VLM and CLIP in terms of speed (4.4 vs. 9.3 milliseconds), space complexity (0.36 vs. 1.6 GB), and performance (0.94 vs. 0.43 average AUC).more » « less
-
Dong, Yinpeng; Pang, Tianyu; Yang, Xiao; Wong, Eric; Kolter, Zico; He, Yuan (Ed.)Current machine learning models suffer from evasion attacks (i.e., adversarial examples) raising concerns in security-sensitive settings such as autonomous vehicles. While many countermeasures may look promising, only a few withstand rigorous evaluation. Recently, defenses using random transformations (RT) have shown impressive results, particularly BaRT (Raff et al. 2019) on ImageNet. However, this type of defense has not been rigorously evaluated, leaving its robustness properties poorly understood. The stochasticity of these models also makes evaluation more challenging and many proposed attacks on deterministic models inapplicable. First, we show that the BPDA attack (Athalye, Carlini, and Wagner 2018) used in BaRT’s evaluation is ineffective and likely overestimates its robustness. We then attempt to construct the strongest possible RT defense through the informed selection of transformations and Bayesian optimization for tuning their parameters. Furthermore, we create the strongest possible attack to evaluate our RT defense. Our new attack vastly outperforms the baseline, reducing the accuracy by 83% compared to the 19% reduction by the commonly used EoT attack (4.3× improvement). Our result indicates that the RT defense on Imagenette dataset (ten-class subset of ImageNet) is not robust against adversarial examples. Extending the study further, we use our new attack to adversarially train RT defense (called AdvRT). However, the attack is still not sufficiently strong, and thus, the AdvRT model is no more robust than its RT counterpart. In the process of formulating our defense and attack, we perform several ablation studies and uncover insights that we hope will broadly benefit scientific communities studying stochastic neural networks and their robustness properties.more » « less
-
The burgeoning fields of machine learning (ML) and quantum machine learning (QML) have shown remarkable potential in tackling complex problems across various domains. However, their susceptibility to adversarial attacks raises concerns when deploying these systems in security-sensitive applications. In this study, we present a comparative analysis of the vulnerability of ML and QML models, specifically conventional neural networks (NN) and quantum neural networks (QNN), to adversarial attacks using a malware dataset. We utilize a software supply chain attack dataset known as ClaMP and develop two distinct models for QNN and NN, employing Pennylane for quantum implementations and TensorFlow and Keras for traditional implementations. Our methodology involves crafting adversarial samples by introducing random noise to a small portion of the dataset and evaluating the impact on the models’ performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score metrics. Based on our observations, both ML and QML models exhibit vulnerability to adversarial attacks. While the QNN’s accuracy decreases more significantly compared to the NN after the attack, it demonstrates better performance in terms of precision and recall, indicating higher resilience in detecting true positives under adversarial conditions. We also find that adversarial samples crafted for one model type can impair the performance of the other, highlighting the need for robust defense mechanisms. Our study serves as a foundation for future research focused on enhancing the security and resilience of ML and QML models, particularly QNN, given its recent advancements. A more extensive range of experiments will be conducted to better understand the performance and robustness of both models in the face of adversarial attacks.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)As deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve extraordi- nary performance in a wide range of tasks, testing their robust- ness under adversarial attacks becomes paramount. Adversarial attacks, also known as adversarial examples, are used to measure the robustness of DNNs and are generated by incorporating imperceptible perturbations into the input data with the intention of altering a DNN’s classification. In prior work in this area, most of the proposed optimization based methods employ gradient descent to find adversarial examples. In this paper, we present an innovative method which generates adversarial examples via convex programming. Our experiment results demonstrate that we can generate adversarial examples with lower distortion and higher transferability than the C&W attack, which is the current state-of-the-art adversarial attack method for DNNs. We achieve 100% attack success rate on both the original undefended models and the adversarially-trained models. Our distortions of the L∞ attack are respectively 31% and 18% lower than the C&W attack for the best case and average case on the CIFAR-10 data set.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3508352.3549389
