skip to main content


Title: Low resistance electrical contacts to few-layered MoS 2 by local pressurization
Abstract The performance of electronic and optoelectronic devices is dominated by charge carrier injection through the metal–semiconductor contacts. Therefore, creating low-resistance electrical contacts is one of the most critical challenges in the development of devices based on new materials, particularly in the case of two-dimensional semiconductors. Herein, we report a strategy to reduce the contact resistance of MoS 2 via local pressurization. We fabricated electrical contacts using an atomic force microscopy tip and applied variable pressure ranging from 0 to 25 GPa. By measuring the transverse electronic transport properties, we show that MoS 2 undergoes a reversible semiconducting-metallic transition under pressure. Planar devices in field effect configuration with electrical contacts performed at pressures above ∼15 GPa show up to 30-fold reduced contact resistance and up to 25-fold improved field-effect mobility when compared to those measured at low pressure. Theoretical simulations show that this enhanced performance is due to improved charge injection to the MoS 2 semiconductor channel through the metallic MoS 2 phase obtained by pressurization. Our results suggest a novel strategy for realizing improved contacts to MoS 2 devices by local pressurization and for exploring emergent phenomena under mechano-electric modulation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2130552
NSF-PAR ID:
10447095
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2D Materials
Volume:
10
Issue:
2
ISSN:
2053-1583
Page Range / eLocation ID:
021003
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The performance of electronic/optoelectronic devices is governed by carrier injection through metal–semiconductor contact; therefore, it is crucial to employ low‐resistance source/drain contacts. However, unintentional introduction of extrinsic defects, such as substoichiometric oxidation states at the metal–semiconductor interface, can degrade carrier injection. In this report, controlling the unintentional extrinsic defect states in layered MoS2is demonstrated using a two‐step chemical treatment, (NH4)2S(aq) treatment and vacuum annealing, to enhance the contact behavior of metal/MoS2interfaces. The two‐step treatment induces changes in the contact of single layer MoS2field effect transistors from nonlinear Schottky to Ohmic behavior, along with a reduction of contact resistance from 35.2 to 5.2 kΩ. Moreover, the enhancement ofIONand electron field effect mobility of single layer MoS2field effect transistors is nearly double forn‐branch operation. This enhanced contact behavior resulting from the two‐step treatment is likely due to the removal of oxidation defects, which can be unintentionally introduced during synthesis or fabrication processes. The removal of oxygen defects is confirmed by scanning tunneling microscopy and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. This two‐step (NH4)2S(aq) chemical functionalization process provides a facile pathway to controlling the defect states in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), to enhance the metal‐contact behavior of TMDs.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Organic semiconductors have sparked interest as flexible, solution processable, and chemically tunable electronic materials. Improvements in charge carrier mobility put organic semiconductors in a competitive position for incorporation in a variety of (opto‐)electronic applications. One example is the organic field‐effect transistor (OFET), which is the fundamental building block of many applications based on organic semiconductors. While the semiconductor performance improvements opened up the possibilities for applying organic materials as active components in fast switching electrical devices, the ability to make good electrical contact hinders further development of deployable electronics. Additionally, inefficient contacts represent serious bottlenecks in identifying new electronic materials by inhibiting access to their intrinsic properties or providing misleading information. Recent work focused on the relationships of contact resistance with device architecture, applied voltage, metal and dielectric interfaces, has led to a steady reduction in contact resistance in OFETs. While impressive progress was made, contact resistance is still above the limits necessary to drive devices at the speed required for many active electronic components. Here, the origins of contact resistance and recent improvement in organic transistors are presented, with emphasis on the electric field and geometric considerations of charge injection in OFETs.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    2D semiconducting materials have immense potential for future electronics due to their atomically thin nature, which enables better scalability. While the channel scalability of 2D materials has been extensively studied, the current understanding of contact scaling in 2D devices is inconsistent and oversimplified. Here physically scaled contacts and asymmetrical contact measurements (ACMs) are combined to investigate the contact scaling behavior in 2D field‐effect transistors. The ACMs directly compare electron injection at different contact lengths while using the exact same MoS2 channel, eliminating channel‐to‐channel variations. The results show that scaled source contacts can limit the drain current, whereas scaled drain contacts do not. Compared to devices with long contact lengths, devices with short contact lengths (scaled contacts) exhibit larger variations, 15% lower drain currents at high drain–source voltages, and a higher chance of early saturation and negative differential resistance. Quantum transport simulations reveal that the transfer length of Ni–MoS2 contacts can be as short as 5 nm. Furthermore, it is clearly identified that the actual transfer length depends on the quality of the metal‐2D interface. The ACMs demonstrated here will enable further understanding of contact scaling behavior at various interfaces.

     
    more » « less
  4. Over the two decades, amorphous oxide semiconductors (AOSs) and their thin film transistor (TFT) channel application have been intensely explored to realize high performance, transparent and flexible displays due to their high field effect mobility (μFE=5-20 cm2/Vs), visible range optical transparency, and low temperature processability (25-300 °C).[1-2] The metastable amorphous phase is to be maintained during operation by the addition of Zn and additional third cation species (e.g., Ga, Hf, or Al) as an amorphous phase stabilizer.[3-5] To limit TFT off-state currents, a thin channel layer (10-20 nm) was employed for InZnO (IZO)-based TFTs, or third cations were added to suppress carrier generations in the TFT channel. To resolve bias stress-induced instabilities in TFT performance, approaches to employ defect passivation layers or enhance channel/dielectric interfacial compatibility were demonstrated.[6-7] Metallization contact is also a dominating factor that determines the performance of TFTs. Particularly, it has been reported that high electrical contact resistance significantly sacrifices drain bias applied to the channel, which leads to undesirable power loss during TFT operation and issues for the measurement of TFT field effect mobilities. [2, 8] However, only a few reports that suggest strategies to enhance contact behaviors are available in the literature. Furthermore, the previous approaches (1) require an additional fabrication complexity due to the use of additional treatments at relatively harsh conditions such as UV, plasma, or high temperatures, and (2) may lead to adverse effects on the channel material attributed to the chemical incompatibility between dissimilar materials, and exposures to harsh environments. Therefore, a simple and easy but effective buffer strategy, which does not require any additional process complexities and not sacrifice chemical compatibility, needs to be established to mitigate the contact issues and therefore achieve high performance and low power consumption AOS TFTs. The present study aims to demonstrate an approach utilizing an interfacial buffer layer, which is compositionally homogeneous to the channel to better align work functions between channel and metallization without a significant fabrication complexity and harsh treatment conditions. Photoelectron spectroscopic measurements reveal that the conducting IZO buffer, of which the work function (Φ) is 4.37 eV, relaxes a relatively large Φ difference between channel IZO (Φ=4.81 eV) and Ti (Φ=4.2-4.3 eV) metallization. The buffer is found to lower the energy barrier for charge carriers at the source to reach the effective channel region near the dielectric. In addition, the higher carrier density of the buffer and favorable chemical compatibility with the channel (compositionally the same) further contribute to a significant reduction in specific contact resistance as much as more than 2.5 orders of magnitude. The improved contact and carrier supply performance from the source to the channel lead to an enhanced field effect mobility of up to 56.49 cm2/Vs and a threshold voltage of 1.18 V, compared to 13.41 cm2/Vs and 7.44 V of IZO TFTs without a buffer. The present work is unique in that an approach to lower the potential barrier between the source and the effective channel region (located near the channel/dielectric interface, behaving similar to a buried-channel MOSFET [9]) by introducing a contact buffer layer that enhances the field effect mobility and facilitates carrier supply from the source to the effective channel region. 
    more » « less
  5. Resonant tunneling diodes (RTDs) have come full-circle in the past 10 years after their demonstration in the early 1990s as the fastest room-temperature semiconductor oscillator, displaying experimental results up to 712 GHz and fmax values exceeding 1.0 THz [1]. Now the RTD is once again the preeminent electronic oscillator above 1.0 THz and is being implemented as a coherent source [2] and a self-oscillating mixer [3], amongst other applications. This paper concerns RTD electroluminescence – an effect that has been studied very little in the past 30+ years of RTD development, and not at room temperature. We present experiments and modeling of an n-type In0.53Ga0.47As/AlAs double-barrier RTD operating as a cross-gap light emitter at ~300K. The MBE-growth stack is shown in Fig. 1(a). A 15-μm-diam-mesa device was defined by standard planar processing including a top annular ohmic contact with a 5-μm-diam pinhole in the center to couple out enough of the internal emission for accurate free-space power measurements [4]. The emission spectra have the behavior displayed in Fig. 1(b), parameterized by bias voltage (VB). The long wavelength emission edge is at  = 1684 nm - close to the In0.53Ga0.47As bandgap energy of Ug ≈ 0.75 eV at 300 K. The spectral peaks for VB = 2.8 and 3.0 V both occur around  = 1550 nm (h = 0.75 eV), so blue-shifted relative to the peak of the “ideal”, bulk InGaAs emission spectrum shown in Fig. 1(b) [5]. These results are consistent with the model displayed in Fig. 1(c), whereby the broad emission peak is attributed to the radiative recombination between electrons accumulated on the emitter side, and holes generated on the emitter side by interband tunneling with current density Jinter. The blue-shifted main peak is attributed to the quantum-size effect on the emitter side, which creates a radiative recombination rate RN,2 comparable to the band-edge cross-gap rate RN,1. Further support for this model is provided by the shorter wavelength and weaker emission peak shown in Fig. 1(b) around = 1148 nm. Our quantum mechanical calculations attribute this to radiative recombination RR,3 in the RTD quantum well between the electron ground-state level E1,e, and the hole level E1,h. To further test the model and estimate quantum efficiencies, we conducted optical power measurements using a large-area Ge photodiode located ≈3 mm away from the RTD pinhole, and having spectral response between 800 and 1800 nm with a peak responsivity of ≈0.85 A/W at  =1550 nm. Simultaneous I-V and L-V plots were obtained and are plotted in Fig. 2(a) with positive bias on the top contact (emitter on the bottom). The I-V curve displays a pronounced NDR region having a current peak-to-valley current ratio of 10.7 (typical for In0.53Ga0.47As RTDs). The external quantum efficiency (EQE) was calculated from EQE = e∙IP/(∙IE∙h) where IP is the photodiode dc current and IE the RTD current. The plot of EQE is shown in Fig. 2(b) where we see a very rapid rise with VB, but a maximum value (at VB= 3.0 V) of only ≈2×10-5. To extract the internal quantum efficiency (IQE), we use the expression EQE= c ∙i ∙r ≡ c∙IQE where ci, and r are the optical-coupling, electrical-injection, and radiative recombination efficiencies, respectively [6]. Our separate optical calculations yield c≈3.4×10-4 (limited primarily by the small pinhole) from which we obtain the curve of IQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) (right-hand scale). The maximum value of IQE (again at VB = 3.0 V) is 6.0%. From the implicit definition of IQE in terms of i and r given above, and the fact that the recombination efficiency in In0.53Ga0.47As is likely limited by Auger scattering, this result for IQE suggests that i might be significantly high. To estimate i, we have used the experimental total current of Fig. 2(a), the Kane two-band model of interband tunneling [7] computed in conjunction with a solution to Poisson’s equation across the entire structure, and a rate-equation model of Auger recombination on the emitter side [6] assuming a free-electron density of 2×1018 cm3. We focus on the high-bias regime above VB = 2.5 V of Fig. 2(a) where most of the interband tunneling should occur in the depletion region on the collector side [Jinter,2 in Fig. 1(c)]. And because of the high-quality of the InGaAs/AlAs heterostructure (very few traps or deep levels), most of the holes should reach the emitter side by some combination of drift, diffusion, and tunneling through the valence-band double barriers (Type-I offset) between InGaAs and AlAs. The computed interband current density Jinter is shown in Fig. 3(a) along with the total current density Jtot. At the maximum Jinter (at VB=3.0 V) of 7.4×102 A/cm2, we get i = Jinter/Jtot = 0.18, which is surprisingly high considering there is no p-type doping in the device. When combined with the Auger-limited r of 0.41 and c ≈ 3.4×10-4, we find a model value of IQE = 7.4% in good agreement with experiment. This leads to the model values for EQE plotted in Fig. 2(b) - also in good agreement with experiment. Finally, we address the high Jinter and consider a possible universal nature of the light-emission mechanism. Fig. 3(b) shows the tunneling probability T according to the Kane two-band model in the three materials, In0.53Ga0.47As, GaAs, and GaN, following our observation of a similar electroluminescence mechanism in GaN/AlN RTDs (due to strong polarization field of wurtzite structures) [8]. The expression is Tinter = (2/9)∙exp[(-2 ∙Ug 2 ∙me)/(2h∙P∙E)], where Ug is the bandgap energy, P is the valence-to-conduction-band momentum matrix element, and E is the electric field. Values for the highest calculated internal E fields for the InGaAs and GaN are also shown, indicating that Tinter in those structures approaches values of ~10-5. As shown, a GaAs RTD would require an internal field of ~6×105 V/cm, which is rarely realized in standard GaAs RTDs, perhaps explaining why there have been few if any reports of room-temperature electroluminescence in the GaAs devices. [1] E.R. Brown,et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 58, 2291, 1991. [5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981). [2] M. Feiginov et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 99, 233506, 2011. [6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995). [3] Y. Nishida et al., Nature Sci. Reports, 9, 18125, 2019. [7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961). [4] P. Fakhimi, et al., 2019 DRC Conference Digest. [8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018). [5] S. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd Ed. 12.2.1 (Wiley, 1981). [6] L. Coldren, Diode Lasers and Photonic Integrated Circuits, (Wiley, 1995). [7] E.O. Kane, J. of Appl. Phy 32, 83 (1961). [8] T. Growden, et al., Nature Light: Science & Applications 7, 17150 (2018). 
    more » « less