An official website of the United States government
To maximize the profitability of wind power plants, wind farms are often characterized by high wind turbine density leading to operations with reduced turbine spacing. As a consequence, the overall wind farm power capture is hindered by complex flow features associated with flow modifications induced by the various wind turbine rotors. In addition to the generation of wakes, the velocity of the incoming wind field can reduce due to the increased pressure in the proximity of a single turbine rotor (named induction); a similar effect occurs at the wind-farm level (global blockage), which can have a noticeable impact on power production. On the other hand, intra-wind-farm regions featuring increased velocity compared to the freestream (speedups) have also been observed, which can be a source for a potential power boost. To quantify these rotor-induced effects on the incoming wind velocity field, three profiling LiDARs and one scanning wind LiDAR were deployed both before and after the construction of an onshore wind turbine array. The different wind conditions are classified according to the ambient turbulence intensity and streamwise/spanwise spacing among wind turbines. The analysis of the mean velocity field reveals enhanced induction and speedup under stably stratified atmospheric conditions. Furthermore, a reduced horizontal area between adjacent turbines has a small impact on the induction zone but increases significantly the speedup between adjacent rotors.
more »
« less
One‐way mesoscale‐microscale coupling for simulating a wind farm in North Texas: Assessment against SCADA and LiDAR data
Abstract One‐way nested mesoscale to microscale simulations of an onshore wind farm have been performed nesting the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model and our in‐house high‐resolution large‐eddy simulation code (UTD‐WF). Each simulation contains five nested WRF domains, with the largest domain spanning the north Texas Panhandle region with a 4 km resolution, while the highest resolution (50 m) nest simulates microscale wind fluctuations and turbine wakes within a single wind farm. The finest WRF domain in turn drives the UTD‐WF LES higher‐resolution domain for a subset of six turbines at a resolution of ∼5 m. The wind speed, direction, and boundary layer profiles from WRF are compared against measurements obtained with a met‐tower and a scanning Doppler wind LiDAR located within the wind farm. Additionally, power production obtained from WRF and UTD‐WF are assessed against supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) system data. Numerical results agree well with the experimental measurements of the wind speed, direction, and power production of the turbines. UTD‐WF high‐resolution domain improves significantly the agreement of the turbulence intensity at the turbines location compared with that of WRF. Velocity spectra have been computed to assess how the nesting allows resolving a wide range of scales at a reasonable computational cost. A domain sensitivity analysis has been performed. Velocity spectra indicate that placing the inlet too close to the first row of turbines results in an unrealistic peak of energy at the rotational frequency of the turbines. Spectra of the power production of a single turbine and of the cumulative power of the array have been compared with analytical models.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10453856
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Wind Energy
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1095-4244
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 691-710
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)This work focuses on the optimization of performance and profitability of a wind farm carried out by means of an economic model and Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations of wind turbine wakes. Axisymmetric RANS simulations of isolated wind turbine wakes are leveraged with a quadratic super-positioning model to estimate wake interactions within wind farms. The resulting velocity field is used with an actuator disk model to predict power production from each turbine in the wind farm. Design optimization is performed by considering a site in North Texas, whose wind resource statistics are obtained from a meteorological tower. The RANS solver provides capabilities to simulate different incoming wind turbulence intensities and, hence, the wind farm optimization is performed by taking the daily cycle of the atmospheric stability into account. The objective functional of the optimization problem is the levelized cost of energy (LCoE) encompassing capital cost, operation and maintenance costs, land cost and annual power production. At the first level of the optimization problem, the wind farm gross capacity is determined by considering three potential turbine types with different rated power. Subsequently, the optimal wind farm layout is estimated by varying the uniform spacing between consecutive turbine rows. It is found that increasing turbine rated power, the wind farm profitability is enhanced. Substituting a wind farm of 24 turbines of 2.3-MW rated power with 18, 3-MW turbines could reduce the LCoE of about 1.56 $/MWh, while maintaining a similar gross capacity factor. The optimization of the spacing between turbine rows was found to be sensitive to the land cost. For a land cost of 0.05 $/m2, the layout could be designed with a spacing between 6 to 15 rotor diameters without any significant effect on the LCoE, while an increased land cost of 0.1 $/m2 leads to an optimal spacing of about 6 rotor diameters.more » « less
-
Abstract The power performance and the wind velocity field of an onshore wind farm are predicted with machine learning models and the pseudo‐2D RANS model, then assessed against SCADA data. The wind farm under investigation is one of the sites involved with the American WAKE experimeNt (AWAKEN). The performed simulations enable predictions of the power capture at the farm and turbine levels while providing insights into the effects on power capture associated with wake interactions that operating upstream turbines induce, as well as the variability caused by atmospheric stability. The machine learning models show improved accuracy compared to the pseudo‐2D RANS model in the predictions of turbine power capture and farm power capture with roughly half the normalized error. The machine learning models also entail lower computational costs upon training. Further, the machine learning models provide predictions of the wind turbulence intensity at the turbine level for different wind and atmospheric conditions with very good accuracy, which is difficult to achieve through RANS modeling. Additionally, farm‐to‐farm interactions are noted, with adverse impacts on power predictions from both models.more » « less
-
Collective wind farm flow control, where wind turbines are operated in an individually suboptimal strategy to benefit the aggregate farm, has demonstrated potential to reduce wake interactions and increase farm energy production. However, existing wake models used for flow control often estimate the thrust and power of yaw-misaligned turbines using simplified empirical expressions that require expensive calibration data and do not extrapolate accurately between turbine models. The thrust, wake velocity deficit, wake deflection and power of a yawed wind turbine depend on its induced velocity. Here, we extend classical one-dimensional momentum theory to model the induction of a yaw-misaligned actuator disk. Analytical expressions for the induction, thrust, initial wake velocities and power are developed as a function of the yaw angle ( $$\gamma$$ ) and thrust coefficient. The analytical model is validated against large eddy simulations of a yawed actuator disk. Because the induction depends on the yaw and thrust coefficient, the power generated by a yawed actuator disk will always be greater than a $$\cos ^3(\gamma )$$ model suggests. The power lost due to yaw misalignment depends on the thrust coefficient. An analytical expression for the thrust coefficient that maximizes power, depending on the yaw, is developed and validated. Finally, using the developed induction model as an initial condition for a turbulent far-wake model, we demonstrate how combining wake steering and thrust (induction) control can increase array power, compared to either independent steering or induction control, due to the joint dependence of the induction on the thrust coefficient and yaw angle.more » « less
-
Modeling the effect of wind speed and direction shear on utility‐scale wind turbine power productionWind speed and direction variations across the rotor affect power production. As utility‐scale turbines extend higher into the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) with larger rotor diameters and hub heights, they increasingly encounter more complex wind speed and direction variations. We assess three models for power production that account for wind speed and direction shear. Two are based on actuator disc representations, and the third is a blade element representation. We also evaluate the predictions from a standard power curve model that has no knowledge of wind shear. The predictions from each model, driven by wind profile measurements from a profiling LiDAR, are compared to concurrent power measurements from an adjacent utility‐scale wind turbine. In the field measurements of the utility‐scale turbine, discrete combinations of speed and direction shear induce changes in power production of −19% to +34% relative to the turbine power curve for a given hub height wind speed. Positive speed shear generally corresponds to over‐performance and increasing magnitudes of direction shear to greater under‐performance, relative to the power curve. Overall, the blade element model produces both higher correlation and lower error relative to the other models, but its quantitative accuracy depends on induction and controller sub‐models. To further assess the influence of complex, non‐monotonic wind profiles, we also drive the models with best‐fit power law wind speed profiles and linear wind direction profiles. These idealized inputs produce qualitative and quantitative differences in power predictions from each model, demonstrating that time‐varying, non‐monotonic wind shear affects wind power production.more » « less
