skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Evidence for multi-decadal fuel buildup in a large California wildfire from smoke radiocarbon measurements
Abstract In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in annual area burned in California’s Sierra Nevada mountains. This rise in fire activity has prompted the need to understand how historical forest management practices affect fuel composition and emissions. Here we examined the total carbon (TC) concentration and radiocarbon abundance (Δ 14 C) of particulate matter (PM) emitted by the KNP Complex Fire, which occurred during California’s 2021 wildfire season and affected several groves of giant sequoia trees in the southern Sierra Nevada. During a 26 h sampling period, we measured concentrations of fine airborne PM (PM 2.5 ), as well as dry air mole fractions of carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH 4 ), using a ground-based mobile laboratory. We also collected filter samples of PM 2.5 for analysis of TC concentration and Δ 14 C. High correlation among PM 2.5 , CO, and CH 4 time series confirmed that our PM 2.5 measurements captured variability in wildfire emissions. Using a Keeling plot approach, we determined that the mean Δ 14 C of PM 2.5 was 111.6 ± 7.7‰ ( n = 12), which was considerably enriched relative to atmospheric carbon dioxide in the northern hemisphere in 2021 (−3.2 ± 1.4‰). Combining these Δ 14 C data with a steady-state one-box ecosystem model, we estimated that the mean age of fuels combusted in the KNP Complex Fire was 40 years, with a range of 29–57 years. These results provide evidence for emissions originating from woody biomass, larger-diameter fine fuels, and coarse woody debris that have accumulated over multiple decades. This is consistent with independent field observations that indicate high fire intensity contributed to widespread giant sequoia mortality. With the expanded use of prescribed fires planned over the next decade in California to mitigate wildfire impacts, our measurement approach has the potential to provide regionally-integrated estimates of the effectiveness of fuel treatment programs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2117634
PAR ID:
10456062
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Volume:
18
Issue:
9
ISSN:
1748-9326
Page Range / eLocation ID:
094030
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Dryad)
    Over the past several decades, the annual burned area in California's Sierra Nevada mountains has increased considerably, with significant social, economic, and ecosystem impacts that provide motivation for understanding how the history of forest management influences the composition of fuels and emissions in wildfires. Here, we measured the carbon concentration and radiocarbon abundance (∆14C) of fire-emitted particulate matter from the KNP Complex Fire, which burned through several groves of giant sequoia trees in the southern Sierra Nevada mountains during California’s 2021 wildfire season. Over a 26-hour sampling period, we measured the concentration of fine airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) along with carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH4) dry air mole fractions using a ground-based mobile laboratory. Filter samples of PM2.5 were also collected and later analyzed for carbon concentration and ∆14C. Covariation of PM2.5, CO, and CH4 time series data confirmed that our PM2.5 samples were representative of wildfire emissions. Using a Keeling plot approach, we estimated that the mean ∆14C of PM2.5 was 111.5 ± 2.3‰ (n=12), which is considerably enriched relative to that of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the northern hemisphere in 2021 (-3.4 ± 1.4‰). By combining these ∆14C data with a steady-state one-box ecosystem model, we estimated that the mean age of fuels combusted in the KNP Complex Fire was 40 ± 6 years. This multi-decadal fuel age provides evidence for emissions from woody biomass, coarse woody debris, and larger-diameter fine fuels. The combustion of these larger-size fuel classes is consistent with independent field observations that indicate high fire intensity contributed to widespread giant sequoia mortality. With the expanded use of prescribed fires planned over the next decade in California to mitigate impacts of wildfires, our measurement approach has the potential to provide regionally-integrated estimates of the effectiveness of fuel treatment programs. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; (, Earth's Future)
    Abstract Forest fire frequency, extent, and severity have rapidly increased in recent decades across the western United States (US) due to climate change and suppression‐oriented wildfire management. Fuels reduction treatments are an increasingly popular management tool, as evidenced by California's plan to treat 1 million acres annually by 2050. However, the aggregate efficacy of fuels treatments in dry forests at regional and multi‐decadal scales is unknown. We develop a novel fuels treatment module within a coupled dynamic vegetation and fire model to study the effects of dead biomass removal from forests in the Sierra Nevada region of California. We ask how annual treatment extent, stand‐level treatment intensiveness, and spatial treatment placement alter fire severity and live carbon loss. We find that a ∼30% reduction in stand‐replacing fire was achieved under our baseline treatment scenario of 1,000 km2 year−1after a 100‐year treatment period. Prioritizing the most fuel‐heavy stands based on precise fuel distributions yielded cumulative reductions in pyrogenic stand‐replacement of up to 50%. Both removing constraints on treatment location due to remoteness, topography, and management jurisdiction and prioritizing the most fuel‐heavy stands yielded the highest stand‐replacement rate reduction of ∼90%. Even treatments that succeeded in lowering aggregate fire severity often took multiple decades to yield measurable effects, and avoided live carbon loss remained negligible across scenarios. Our results suggest that strategically placed fuels treatments are a promising tool for controlling forest fire severity at regional, multi‐decadal scales, but may be less effective for mitigating live carbon losses. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change)
    Climate change has intensified the scale of global wildfire impacts in recent decades. In order to reduce fire impacts, management policies are being proposed in the western United States to lower fire risk that focus on harvesting trees, including large-diameter trees. Many policies already do not include diameter limits and some recent policies have proposed diameter increases in fuel reduction strategies. While the primary goal is fire risk reduction, these policies have been interpreted as strategies that can be used to save trees from being killed by fire, thus preventing carbon emissions and feedbacks to climate warming. This interpretation has already resulted in cutting down trees that likely would have survived fire, resulting in forest carbon losses that are greater than if a wildfire had occurred. To help policymakers and managers avoid these unintended carbon consequences and to present carbon emission sources in the same context, we calculate western United States forest fire carbon emissions and compare them with harvest and fossil fuel emissions (FFE) over the same timeframe. We find that forest fire carbon emissions are on average only 6% of anthropogenic FFE over the past decade. While wildfire occurrence and area burned have increased over the last three decades, per area fire emissions for extreme fire events are relatively constant. In contrast, harvest of mature trees releases a higher density of carbon emissions (e.g., per unit area) relative to wildfire (150–800%) because harvest causes a higher rate of tree mortality than wildfire. Our results show that increasing harvest of mature trees to save them from fire increases emissions rather than preventing them. Shown in context, our results demonstrate that reducing FFEs will do more for climate mitigation potential (and subsequent reduction of fire) than increasing extractive harvest to prevent fire emissions. On public lands, management aimed at less-intensive fuels reduction (such as removal of “ladder” fuels, i.e., shrubs and small-diameter trees) will help to balance reducing catastrophic fire and leave live mature trees on the landscape to continue carbon uptake. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Environmental Research Communications)
    Abstract Reducing the risk of large, severe wildfires while also increasing the security of mountain water supplies and enhancing biodiversity are urgent priorities in western US forests. After a century of fire suppression, Yosemite and Sequoia-Kings Canyon National Parks located in California’s Sierra Nevada initiated programs to manage wildfires and these areas present a rare opportunity to study the effects of restored fire regimes. Forest cover decreased during the managed wildfire period and meadow and shrubland cover increased, especially in Yosemite’s Illilouette Creek basin that experienced a 20% reduction in forest area. These areas now support greater pyrodiversity and consequently greater landscape and species diversity. Soil moisture increased and drought-induced tree mortality decreased, especially in Illilouette where wildfires have been allowed to burn more freely resulting in a 30% increase in summer soil moisture. Modeling suggests that the ecohydrological co-benefits of restoring fire regimes are robust to the projected climatic warming. Support will be needed from the highest levels of government and the public to maintain existing programs and expand them to other forested areas. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres)
    Abstract Coupled fire‐atmosphere models often struggle to simulate important fire processes like fire generated flows, deep flaming fronts, extreme updrafts, and stratospheric smoke injection during large wildfires. This study uses the coupled fire‐atmosphere model, WRF‐Fire, to examine the sensitivities of some of these phenomena to the modeled total fuel load and its consumption. Specifically, the 2020 Bear Fire and 2021 Caldor Fire in California's Sierra Nevada are simulated using three fuel loading scenarios (1X, 4X, and 8X LANDFIRE derived surface fuel), while controlling the fire rate of spread using observations. This approach helps isolate the fuel loading and consumption needed to produce fire‐generated winds and plume rise comparable to radar observations of these events. Increasing fuel loads and corresponding fire residence time in WRF‐Fire leads to deep plumes in excess of 10 km, strong vertical velocities of 40–45 m s−1, and combustion fronts several kilometers in width (in the along wind direction). These results indicate that LANDFIRE‐based surface fuel loads in WRF‐Fire likely under‐represent fuel loading, having significant implications for simulating landscape‐scale wildfire processes, associated impacts on spread, and fire‐atmosphere feedbacks. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email