An official website of the United States government
Abstract In recent decades, there has been a significant increase in annual area burned in California’s Sierra Nevada mountains. This rise in fire activity has prompted the need to understand how historical forest management practices affect fuel composition and emissions. Here we examined the total carbon (TC) concentration and radiocarbon abundance (Δ 14 C) of particulate matter (PM) emitted by the KNP Complex Fire, which occurred during California’s 2021 wildfire season and affected several groves of giant sequoia trees in the southern Sierra Nevada. During a 26 h sampling period, we measured concentrations of fine airborne PM (PM 2.5 ), as well as dry air mole fractions of carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH 4 ), using a ground-based mobile laboratory. We also collected filter samples of PM 2.5 for analysis of TC concentration and Δ 14 C. High correlation among PM 2.5 , CO, and CH 4 time series confirmed that our PM 2.5 measurements captured variability in wildfire emissions. Using a Keeling plot approach, we determined that the mean Δ 14 C of PM 2.5 was 111.6 ± 7.7‰ ( n = 12), which was considerably enriched relative to atmospheric carbon dioxide in the northern hemisphere in 2021 (−3.2 ± 1.4‰). Combining these Δ 14 C data with a steady-state one-box ecosystem model, we estimated that the mean age of fuels combusted in the KNP Complex Fire was 40 years, with a range of 29–57 years. These results provide evidence for emissions originating from woody biomass, larger-diameter fine fuels, and coarse woody debris that have accumulated over multiple decades. This is consistent with independent field observations that indicate high fire intensity contributed to widespread giant sequoia mortality. With the expanded use of prescribed fires planned over the next decade in California to mitigate wildfire impacts, our measurement approach has the potential to provide regionally-integrated estimates of the effectiveness of fuel treatment programs.
more »
« less
Evidence for multi-decadal fuel buildup in a large California wildfire from smoke radiocarbon measurements
Over the past several decades, the annual burned area in California's Sierra Nevada mountains has increased considerably, with significant social, economic, and ecosystem impacts that provide motivation for understanding how the history of forest management influences the composition of fuels and emissions in wildfires. Here, we measured the carbon concentration and radiocarbon abundance (∆14C) of fire-emitted particulate matter from the KNP Complex Fire, which burned through several groves of giant sequoia trees in the southern Sierra Nevada mountains during California’s 2021 wildfire season. Over a 26-hour sampling period, we measured the concentration of fine airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) along with carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH4) dry air mole fractions using a ground-based mobile laboratory. Filter samples of PM2.5 were also collected and later analyzed for carbon concentration and ∆14C. Covariation of PM2.5, CO, and CH4 time series data confirmed that our PM2.5 samples were representative of wildfire emissions. Using a Keeling plot approach, we estimated that the mean ∆14C of PM2.5 was 111.5 ± 2.3‰ (n=12), which is considerably enriched relative to that of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the northern hemisphere in 2021 (-3.4 ± 1.4‰). By combining these ∆14C data with a steady-state one-box ecosystem model, we estimated that the mean age of fuels combusted in the KNP Complex Fire was 40 ± 6 years. This multi-decadal fuel age provides evidence for emissions from woody biomass, coarse woody debris, and larger-diameter fine fuels. The combustion of these larger-size fuel classes is consistent with independent field observations that indicate high fire intensity contributed to widespread giant sequoia mortality. With the expanded use of prescribed fires planned over the next decade in California to mitigate impacts of wildfires, our measurement approach has the potential to provide regionally-integrated estimates of the effectiveness of fuel treatment programs.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2117634
- PAR ID:
- 10535058
- Publisher / Repository:
- Dryad
- Date Published:
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- Earth and related environmental sciences aerosol PM2.5 radiocarbon signatures trace gas turnover time
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: 7686593 bytes
- Size(s):
- 7686593 bytes
- Location:
- California
- Right(s):
- Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
- Institution:
- University of California, Irvine
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The impacts of wildfires along the wildland urban interface (WUI) on atmospheric particulate concentrations and composition are an understudied source of air pollution exposure. To assess the residual impacts of the 2021 Marshall Fire (Colorado), a wildfire that predominantly burned homes and other human-made materials, on homes within the fire perimeter that escaped the fire, we performed a combination of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) filter sampling and chemical analysis, indoor dust collection and chemical analysis, community scale PurpleAir PM2.5 analysis, and indoor particle number concentration measurements. Following the fire, the chemical speciation of dust collected in smoke-affected homes in the burned zone showed elevated concentrations of the biomass burning marker levoglucosan (medianlevo = 4147 ng g−1), EPA priority toxic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (median Σ16PAH = 1859.3 ng g−1), and metals (median Σ20Metals = 34.6 mg g−1) when compared to samples collected in homes outside of the burn zone 6 months after the fire. As indoor dust particles are often resuspended and can become airborne, the enhanced concentration of hazardous metals and organics within dust samples may pose a threat to human health. Indoor airborne particulate organic carbon (median = 1.91 μg m−3), particulate elemental carbon (median = .02 μg m−3), and quantified semi-volatile organic species in PM2.5 were found in concentrations comparable to ambient air in urban areas across the USA. Particle number and size distribution analysis at a heavily instrumented supersite home located immediately next to the burned area showed indoor particulates in low concentrations (below 10 μg m−3) across various sizes of PM (12 nm–20 μm), but were elevated by resuspension from human activity, including cleaning.more » « less
-
Abstract Recent prolonged droughts and catastrophic wildfires in the western United States have raised concerns about the potential for forest mortality to impact forest structure, forest ecosystem services, and the economic vitality of communities in the coming decades. We used the Community Land Model (CLM) to determine forest vulnerability to mortality from drought and fire by the year 2049. We modified CLM to represent 13 major forest types in the western United States and ran simulations at a 4‐km grid resolution, driven with climate projections from two general circulation models under one emissions scenario (RCP 8.5). We developed metrics of vulnerability to short‐term extreme and prolonged drought based on annual allocation to stem growth and net primary productivity. We calculated fire vulnerability based on changes in simulated future area burned relative to historical area burned. Simulated historical drought vulnerability was medium to high in areas with observations of recent drought‐related mortality. Comparisons of observed and simulated historical area burned indicate simulated future fire vulnerability could be underestimated by 3% in the Sierra Nevada and overestimated by 3% in the Rocky Mountains. Projections show that water‐limited forests in the Rocky Mountains, Southwest, and Great Basin regions will be the most vulnerable to future drought‐related mortality, and vulnerability to future fire will be highest in the Sierra Nevada and portions of the Rocky Mountains. High carbon‐density forests in the Pacific coast and western Cascades regions are projected to be the least vulnerable to either drought or fire. Importantly, differences in climate projections lead to only 1% of the domain with conflicting low and high vulnerability to fire and no area with conflicting drought vulnerability. Our drought vulnerability metrics could be incorporated as probabilistic mortality rates in earth system models, enabling more robust estimates of the feedbacks between the land and atmosphere over the 21st century.more » « less
-
Climate change has intensified the scale of global wildfire impacts in recent decades. In order to reduce fire impacts, management policies are being proposed in the western United States to lower fire risk that focus on harvesting trees, including large-diameter trees. Many policies already do not include diameter limits and some recent policies have proposed diameter increases in fuel reduction strategies. While the primary goal is fire risk reduction, these policies have been interpreted as strategies that can be used to save trees from being killed by fire, thus preventing carbon emissions and feedbacks to climate warming. This interpretation has already resulted in cutting down trees that likely would have survived fire, resulting in forest carbon losses that are greater than if a wildfire had occurred. To help policymakers and managers avoid these unintended carbon consequences and to present carbon emission sources in the same context, we calculate western United States forest fire carbon emissions and compare them with harvest and fossil fuel emissions (FFE) over the same timeframe. We find that forest fire carbon emissions are on average only 6% of anthropogenic FFE over the past decade. While wildfire occurrence and area burned have increased over the last three decades, per area fire emissions for extreme fire events are relatively constant. In contrast, harvest of mature trees releases a higher density of carbon emissions (e.g., per unit area) relative to wildfire (150–800%) because harvest causes a higher rate of tree mortality than wildfire. Our results show that increasing harvest of mature trees to save them from fire increases emissions rather than preventing them. Shown in context, our results demonstrate that reducing FFEs will do more for climate mitigation potential (and subsequent reduction of fire) than increasing extractive harvest to prevent fire emissions. On public lands, management aimed at less-intensive fuels reduction (such as removal of “ladder” fuels, i.e., shrubs and small-diameter trees) will help to balance reducing catastrophic fire and leave live mature trees on the landscape to continue carbon uptake.more » « less
-
Abstract Coupled fire‐atmosphere models often struggle to simulate important fire processes like fire generated flows, deep flaming fronts, extreme updrafts, and stratospheric smoke injection during large wildfires. This study uses the coupled fire‐atmosphere model, WRF‐Fire, to examine the sensitivities of some of these phenomena to the modeled total fuel load and its consumption. Specifically, the 2020 Bear Fire and 2021 Caldor Fire in California's Sierra Nevada are simulated using three fuel loading scenarios (1X, 4X, and 8X LANDFIRE derived surface fuel), while controlling the fire rate of spread using observations. This approach helps isolate the fuel loading and consumption needed to produce fire‐generated winds and plume rise comparable to radar observations of these events. Increasing fuel loads and corresponding fire residence time in WRF‐Fire leads to deep plumes in excess of 10 km, strong vertical velocities of 40–45 m s−1, and combustion fronts several kilometers in width (in the along wind direction). These results indicate that LANDFIRE‐based surface fuel loads in WRF‐Fire likely under‐represent fuel loading, having significant implications for simulating landscape‐scale wildfire processes, associated impacts on spread, and fire‐atmosphere feedbacks.more » « less
