skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: An integer program for positive semidefinite zero forcing in graphs
Abstract Positive semidefinite (PSD) zero forcing is a dynamic graph process in which an initial subset of vertices are colored and may cause additional vertices to become colored through a set of color changing rules. Subsets which cause all other vertices to become colored are called PSD zero forcing sets; the PSD zero forcing number of a graph is the minimum cardinality attained by its PSD zero forcing sets. The PSD zero forcing number is of particular interest as it bounds solutions for the minimum rank and PSD min rank problems, both popular in linear algebra. This paper introduces blocking sets for PSD zero forcing sets which are used to formulate the first integer program (IP) for computing PSD zero forcing numbers of general graphs. It is shown that facets of the feasible region of this IP's linear relaxation correspond to zero forcing forts which induce connected subgraphs, but that identifying min cardinality connected forts is‐hard in general. Auxiliary IPs used to find these blocking sets are also given, enabling the master IP to be solved via constraint generation. Experiments comparing the proposed methods and existing algorithms are provided demonstrating improved runtime performance, particularly so in dense and sparse graphs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1720225
PAR ID:
10456970
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Networks
Volume:
76
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0028-3045
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 366-380
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. For a given a graph G, the zero forcing number of G, Z(G), is the smallest cardinality of any set S of vertices on which repeated applications of the forcing rule results in all vertices being included in S. The forcing rule is as follows: if a vertex v is in S, and exactly one neighbor u of v is not in S, then u is added to S in the next iteration. The failed zero forcing number of a graph was introduced by Fetcie, Jacob, and Saavedra and was defined as the cardinality of the largest set of vertices which fails to force all vertices in the graph. In 2021, Gomez et al. proved that there were exactly 15 graphs with a failed zero forcing number of two, but their proof was complicated, requiring the analysis of many graph families. We present an “inverse” approach where we start with a set of vertices S and then see which graphs have S as a maximum-sized failed zero forcing set. This results in not only a shorter proof but characterizes which graphs have a particular failed zero forcing set. In our proof, we characterize the graphs which have a failed zero forcing set S where |S|=2, meaning considering all simple graphs of order two as induced subgraphs. This approach also has greater potential for characterizing graphs where F(G)>2 since many general arguments on the structure of graphs are developed in this type of analysis and are applicable for failed zero forcing sets of any size. 
    more » « less
  2. Given a graph G, the zero forcing number of G, Z(G), is the minimum cardinality of any set S of vertices of which repeated applications of the forcing rule results in all vertices being in S. The forcing rule is: if a vertex v is in S, and exactly one neighbor u of v is not in S, then u is added to S in the next iteration. Hence the failed zero forcing number of a graph was defined to be the cardinality of the largest set of vertices which fails to force all vertices in the graph. A similar property called skew zero forcing was defined so that if there is exactly one neighbor u of v is not in S, then u is added to S in the next iteration. The difference is that vertices that are not in S can force other vertices. This leads to the failed skew zero forcing number of a graph, which is denoted by F−(G). In this paper, we provide a complete characterization of all graphs with F−(G)=1. Fetcie, Jacob, and Saavedra showed that the only graphs with a failed zero forcing number of 1 are either: the union of two isolated vertices; P3; K3; or K4. In this paper, we provide a surprising result: changing the forcing rule to a skew-forcing rule results in an infinite number of graphs with F−(G)=1. 
    more » « less
  3. The study of power domination in graphs arises from the problem of placing a minimum number of measurement devices in an electrical network while monitoring the entire network. A power dominating set of a graph is a set of vertices from which every vertex in the graph can be observed, following a set of rules for power system monitoring. In this paper, we study the problem of finding a minimum power dominating set which is connected; the cardinality of such a set is called the connected power domination number of the graph. We show that the connected power domination number of a graph is NP-hard to compute in general, but can be computed in linear time in cactus graphs and block graphs. We also give various structural results about connected power domination, including a cut vertex decomposition and a characterization of the effects of various vertex and edge operations on the connected power domination number. Finally, we present novel integer programming formulations for power domination, connected power domination, and power propagation time, and give computational results. 
    more » « less
  4. We study a noisy graph isomorphism problem, where the goal is to perfectly recover the vertex correspondence between two edge‐correlated graphs, with an initial seed set of correctly matched vertex pairs revealed as side information. We show that it is possible to achieve the information‐theoretic limit of graph sparsity in time polynomial in the number of verticesn. Moreover, we show the number of seeds needed for perfect recovery in polynomial‐time can be as low asin the sparse graph regime (with the average degree smaller than) andin the dense graph regime, for a small positive constant. Unlike previous work on graph matching, which used small neighborhoods or small subgraphs with a logarithmic number of vertices in order to match vertices, our algorithms match vertices if their large neighborhoods have a significant overlap in the number of seeds. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract In this paper, we consider a randomized greedy algorithm for independent sets inr‐uniformd‐regular hypergraphsGonnvertices with girthg. By analyzing the expected size of the independent sets generated by this algorithm, we show that, whereconverges to 0 asg → ∞for fixeddandr, andf(d, r) is determined by a differential equation. This extends earlier results of Garmarnik and Goldberg for graphs [8]. We also prove that when applying this algorithm to uniform linear hypergraphs with bounded degree, the size of the independent sets generated by this algorithm concentrate around the mean asymptotically almost surely. 
    more » « less