More Like this

1. Observations of Mantle Seismic Anisotropy Using Array Techniques: Shear‐Wave Splitting of Beamformed SmKS Phases

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB025556  

   Wolf, Jonathan ; Frost, Daniel A. ; Long, Maureen D. ; Garnero, Edward ; Aderoju, Adeolu O. ; Creasy, Neala ; Bozdağ, Ebru ( December 2022 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth)

   Shear‐wave splitting measurements are commonly used to resolve seismic anisotropy in both the upper and lowermost mantle. Typically, such techniques are applied to SmKS phases that have reflected (m‐1) times off the underside of the core‐mantle boundary before being recorded. Practical constraints for shear‐wave splitting studies include the limited number of suitable phases as well as the large fraction of available data discarded because of poor signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs) or large measurement uncertainties. Array techniques such as beamforming are commonly used in observational seismology to enhance SNRs, but have not been applied before to improve SmKS signal strength and coherency for shear wave splitting studies. Here, we investigate how a beamforming methodology, based on slowness and backazimuth vespagrams to determine the most coherent incoming wave direction, can improve shear‐wave splitting measurement confidence intervals. Through the analysis of real and synthetic seismograms, we show that (a) the splitting measurements obtained from the beamformed seismograms (beams) reflect an average of the single‐station splitting parameters that contribute to the beam; (b) the beams have (on average) more than twice as large SNRs than the single‐station seismograms that contribute to the beam; (c) the increased SNRs allow the reliable measurement of shear wave splitting parameters from beams down to average single‐station SNRs of 1.3. Beamforming may thus be helpful to more reliably measure splitting due to upper mantle anisotropy. Moreover, we show that beamforming holds potential to greatly improve detection of lowermost mantle anisotropy by demonstrating differential SKS–SKKS splitting analysis using beamformed USArray data.

    

   more » « less
2. Constraining deep mantle anisotropy with shear wave splitting measurements: challenges and new measurement strategies

   https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggac055  

   Wolf, Jonathan ; Long, Maureen D. ; Leng, Kuangdai ; Nissen-Meyer, Tarje ( February 2022 , Geophysical Journal International)

   Determinations of seismic anisotropy, or the dependence of seismic wave velocities on the polarization or propagation direction of the wave, can allow for inferences on the style of deformation and the patterns of flow in the Earth’s interior. While it is relatively straightforward to resolve seismic anisotropy in the uppermost mantle directly beneath a seismic station, measurements of deep mantle anisotropy are more challenging. This is due in large part to the fact that measurements of anisotropy in the deep mantle are typically blurred by the potential influence of upper mantle and/or crustal anisotropy beneath a seismic station. Several shear wave splitting techniques are commonly used that attempt resolve seismic anisotropy in deep mantle by considering the presence of multiple anisotropic layers along a raypath. Examples include source-side S-wave splitting, which is used to characterize anisotropy in the deep upper mantle and mantle transition zone beneath subduction zones, and differential S-ScS and differential SKS-SKKS splitting, which are used to study anisotropy in the D″ layer at the base of the mantle. Each of these methods has a series of assumptions built into them that allow for the consideration of multiple regions of anisotropy. In this work, we systematically assess the accuracy of these assumptions. To do this, we conduct global wavefield modelling using the spectral element solver AxiSEM3D. We compute synthetic seismograms for earth models that include seismic anisotropy at the periods relevant for shear wave splitting measurements (down to 5 s). We apply shear wave splitting algorithms to our synthetic seismograms and analyse whether the assumptions that underpin common measurement techniques are adequate, and whether these techniques can correctly resolve the anisotropy incorporated in our models. Our simulations reveal some inaccuracies and limitations of reliability in various methods. Specifically, explicit corrections for upper mantle anisotropy, which are often used in source-side direct S splitting and S-ScS differential splitting, are typically reliable for the fast polarization direction ϕ but not always for the time lag δt, and their accuracy depends on the details of the upper mantle elastic tensor. We find that several of the assumptions that underpin the S-ScS differential splitting technique are inaccurate under certain conditions, and we suggest modifications to traditional S-ScS differential splitting approaches that lead to improved reliability. We investigate the reliability of differential SKS-SKKS splitting intensity measurements as an indicator for lowermost mantle anisotropy and find that the assumptions built into the splitting intensity formula can break down for strong splitting cases. We suggest some guidelines to ensure the accuracy of SKS-SKKS splitting intensity comparisons that are often used to infer lowermost mantle anisotropy. Finally, we suggest a new strategy to detect lowermost mantle anisotropy which does not rely on explicit upper mantle corrections and use this method to analyse the lowermost mantle beneath east Asia.

    

   more » « less
3. Global compilation of deep mantle anisotropy observations and possible correlation with low velocity provinces

   Wolf, J. ; Long, M. D. ; Li, M. ; Garnero, E. ( October 2023 , Geochemistry geophysics geosystems)

   We compile and make publicly available a global digital database of body wave observations of seismic anisotropy in the D′′ layer, grouped using the method used to analyze deep mantle anisotropy. Using this database, we examine the global distribution of seismic anisotropy in the D′′ layer, evaluating the question of whether seismic anisotropy is more likely to be located at the edges of the two large-low velocity provinces (LLVPs) in Earth's mantle than elsewhere. We show that this hypothesis lacks statistical justification if we consider previously observed lowermost mantle anisotropy, although there are multiple factors that are difficult to account for quantitatively. One such factor is the global lowermost mantle ray coverage for different phases that are commonly used to detect deep mantle anisotropy in shear wave splitting studies. We find that the global ray coverage of the relevant seismic phases is highly uneven, with LLVP edges and their interiors less well-sampled than the global average. 

   more » « less
4. Global Compilation of Deep Mantle Anisotropy Observations and Possible Correlation With Low Velocity Provinces

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GC011070  

   Wolf, Jonathan ; Long, Maureen D. ; Li, Mingming ; Garnero, Edward ( October 2023 , Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems)

   We compile and make publicly available a global digital database of body wave observations of seismic anisotropy in the D′′ layer, grouped using the method used to analyze deep mantle anisotropy. Using this database, we examine the global distribution of seismic anisotropy in the D′′ layer, evaluating the question of whether seismic anisotropy is more likely to be located at the edges of the two large‐low velocity provinces (LLVPs) in Earth's mantle than elsewhere. We show that this hypothesis lacks statistical justification if we consider previously observed lowermost mantle anisotropy, although there are multiple factors that are difficult to account for quantitatively. One such factor is the global lowermost mantle ray coverage for different phases that are commonly used to detect deep mantle anisotropy in shear wave splitting studies. We find that the global ray coverage of the relevant seismic phases is highly uneven, with LLVP edges and their interiors less well‐sampled than the global average.

    

   more » « less
5. Lowermost Mantle Structure Beneath the Central Pacific Ocean: Ultralow Velocity Zones and Seismic Anisotropy

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GC010853  

   Wolf, Jonathan ; Long, Maureen D. ( June 2023 , Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems)

   Ultralow velocity zones (ULVZs) and seismic anisotropy are both commonly detected in the lowermost mantle at the edges of the two antipodal large low velocity provinces (LLVPs). The preferential occurrences of both ULVZs and anisotropy at LLVP edges are potentially connected to deep mantle dynamics; however, the two phenomena are typically investigated separately. Here we use waveforms from three deep earthquakes to jointly investigate ULVZ structure and lowermost mantle anisotropy near an edge of the Pacific LLVP to the southeast of Hawaii. We model global wave propagation through candidate lowermost mantle structures using AxiSEM3D. Two structures that cause ULVZ‐characteristic postcursors in our data are identified and are modeled as cylindrical ULVZs with radii of ∼1° and ∼3° and velocity reductions of ∼36% and ∼20%. One of these features has not been detected before. The ULVZs are located to the south of Hawaii and are part of the previously detected complex low velocity structure at the base of the mantle in our study region. The waveforms also reveal that, to first order, the base of the mantle in our study region is a broad and thin region of modestly low velocities. Measurements of S_diffshear wave splitting reveal evidence for lowermost mantle anisotropy that is approximately co‐located with ULVZ material. Our measurements of co‐located anisotropy and ULVZ material suggest plausible geodynamic scenarios for flow in the deep mantle near the Pacific LLVP edge.

    

   more » « less