An official website of the United States government
Introducing robots to future construction sites will impose extra uncertainties and necessitate workers’ situational awareness (SA) of them. While previous literature has suggested that system errors, trust changes, and time pressure may affect SA, the linkage between these factors and workers’ SA in the future construction industry is understudied. Therefore, this study aimed to fill the research gap by simulating a future bricklaying worker-robot collaborative task where participants experienced robot errors and time pressure during the interaction. The results indicated that robot errors significantly impacted subjects’ trust in robots. However, under time pressure in time-critical construction tasks, workers tended to recover their reduced trust in the faulty robots (sometimes over-trust) and reduce their situational awareness. The contributions of this study lie in providing insights into the importance of SA in future jobsites and the need for investigating effective strategies for better preparing future workers.
more »
« less
Attributing responsibility for performance failure on worker-robot trust in construction collaborative tasks
Recent advances in construction automation increased the need for cooperation between workers and robots, where workers have to face both success and failure in human-robot collaborative work, ultimately affecting their trust in robots. This study simulated a worker-robot bricklaying collaborative task to examine the impacts of blame targets (responsibility attributions) on trust and trust transfer in multi-robots-human interaction. The findings showed that workers’ responsibility attributions to themselves or robots significantly affect their trust in the robot. Further, in a multi-robots-human interaction, observing one robot’s failure to complete the task will affect the trust in the other devices, aka., trust transfer.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2128970
- PAR ID:
- 10469124
- Publisher / Repository:
- European Council on Computing in Construction
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
With the construction sector primed to incorporate such advanced technologies as artificial intelligence (AI), robots, and machines, these advanced tools will require a deep understanding of human–robot trust dynamics to support safety and productivity. Although other disciplines have broadly investigated human trust-building with robots, the discussion within the construction domain is still nascent, raising concerns because construction workers are increasingly expected to work alongside robots or cobots, and to communicate and interact with drones. Without a better understanding of how construction workers can appropriately develop and calibrate their trust in their robotic counterparts, the implementation of advanced technologies may raise safety and productivity issues within these already-hazardous jobsites. Consequently, this study conducted a systematic review of the human–robot trust literature to (1) understand human–robot trust-building in construction and other domains; and (2) establish a roadmap for investigating and fostering worker–robot trust in the construction industry. The proposed worker–robot trust-building roadmap includes three phases: static trust based on the factors related to workers, robots, and construction sites; dynamic trust understood via measuring, modeling, and interpreting real-time trust behaviors; and adaptive trust, wherein adaptive calibration strategies and adaptive training facilitate appropriate trust-building. This roadmap sheds light on a progressive procedure to uncover the appropriate trust-building between workers and robots in the construction industry.more » « less
-
Robots are increasingly being employed for diverse applications where they must work and coexist with humans. The trust in human–robot collaboration (HRC) is a critical aspect of any shared-task performance for both the human and the robot. The study of a human-trusting robot has been investigated by numerous researchers. However, a robot-trusting human, which is also a significant issue in HRC, is seldom explored in the field of robotics. Motivated by this gap, we propose a novel trust-assist framework for human–robot co-carry tasks in this study. This framework allows the robot to determine a trust level for its human co-carry partner. The calculations of this trust level are based on human motions, past interactions between the human–robot pair, and the human’s current performance in the co-carry task. The trust level between the human and the robot is evaluated dynamically throughout the collaborative task, and this allows the trust to change if the human performs false positive actions, which can help the robot avoid making unpredictable movements and causing injury to the human. Additionally, the proposed framework can enable the robot to generate and perform assisting movements to follow human-carrying motions and paces when the human is considered trustworthy in the co-carry task. The results of our experiments suggest that the robot effectively assists the human in real-world collaborative tasks through the proposed trust-assist framework.more » « less
-
Autonomous agents are increasingly becoming construction workers’ teammates, making them an integral part of tomorrow’s construction industry. Although many expect that worker–autonomy teaming will enhance construction efficiency, the presence of auto-agents, or robots necessitates an appropriate level of trust-building between workers and their autonomous counterparts, especially because these auto-agents’ perfection still cannot be guaranteed. Although researchers have widely explored human–autonomy trust in various domains—such as manufacturing and the military—discussion of this teaming dynamic within the construction sector is still nascent. To address this gap, this paper simulated a futuristic bricklaying task to (1) examine whether identifying autonomous agents’ physical and informational failures and risk perception affect workers’ trust levels, and (2) investigate workers’ neuropsychophysiological responses as a measure of trust levels toward robots, especially when autonomous agents are faulty. Results indicate that (1) identification of both types of failures and high-risk perception significantly reduce workers’ trust in autonomous agents, and the nuances of workers’ responses to both types of failures were discerned; and (2) brain activation correlates with trust changes. The findings suggest that workers’ unfamiliarity with autonomous technologies, coupled with fast-growing interest in adopting them, may leave workers at risk of improper trust transfer or overtrust in the autonomous agents. This study contributes to an expanding exploration of worker–autonomy trust in construction and calls for further investigations into effective approaches for auto-agents to communicate their physical and informational failures and to help workers recover and repair trust.more » « less
-
Collaborative robots provide prospective and great solutions to human–robot cooperative tasks. In this paper, we present a comprehensive review for two significant topics in human–robot interaction: robots learning from demonstrations and human comfort. The collaboration quality between the human and the robot has been improved largely by taking advantage of robots learning from demonstrations. Human teaching and robot learning approaches with their corresponding applications are investigated in this review. We also discuss several important issues that need to be paid attention to and addressed in the human–robot teaching–learning process. After that, the factors that may affect human comfort in human–robot interaction are described and discussed. Moreover, the measures utilized to improve human acceptance of robots and human comfort in human–robot interaction are also presented and discussed.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.35490/EC3.2023.205
