We explored the feasibility of using biomechanical simulations to predict altered spinal forces resulting from wearing a back-support exoskeleton (BSE) during repetitive lifting tasks. Twenty (10M, 10F) young, healthy participants completed repetitive lifting task, while wearing a BSE (‘with EXO’) and without wearing a BSE (‘without EXO’). Spinal forces were estimated by applying the BSE torque profile to body kinematics measured in ‘with EXO’ condition, while spinal forces were simulated by applying the same torque profile to body kinematics measured in ‘without EXO’ condition. Simulated compression force was higher than estimated compression force, probably due to lower trunk flexion angle in ‘without EXO’ condition. Such differences were larger among women than among men. However, simulated shear force was comparable with estimated shear force. Future works further need to compare simulated and estimated spinal forces for different BSEs (e.g., soft BSE), asymmetric lifting tasks, and different age group.
As occupational exoskeletons are approaching real world implementation, perceptions about use and their effectiveness may differ across diverse age/gender groups, and device design. A soft and rigid type back-support exoskeleton (EXO) were evaluated in terms of selfrated maximum acceptable load (MAL), usability/social perceptions, and biomechanical outcomes during simulated manual material handling tasks. Thirty-six female and male participants from two age groups (18- 30 and 45-60 years) completed repetitive lifting and lowering tasks. Overall, both EXOs significantly improved participants’ MAL by ~6-7%, reduced peak trunk angle by 3-5 degrees, and reduced peak trunk extensor muscle activity by 9 - 13% . Participants generally reported both the EXOs as being useful, easy to use, and safe. This first systematic consideration of diverse age groups using a psychophysics approach in the context of passive occupational EXO use in laboratory settings contributes to bridging the gap between lab and field studies in exoskeleton implementations.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 2128926
- PAR ID:
- 10469866
- Publisher / Repository:
- SAGE Publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
- Volume:
- 67
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1071-1813
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 788-789
- Size(s):
- p. 788-789
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
more » « less
The labor-intensive nature of the construction industry requires workers to frequently perform physically demanding manual work, thereby exposing them to the risk of musculoskeletal injury (approximately 31.2 cases per 10,000 full-time equivalent workers). Exoskeletons and exosuits (collectively called EXOs here) are designed to protect workers from these injuries by reducing exertion and muscle fatigue during work. However, the usability of EXOs in construction is still not clear. This is because extant EXO assessments in construction were mainly conducted in laboratory environments with test participants who are not construction professionals. In this research, we conducted a pilot study to investigate the usability of EXOs in a real construction workplace. Four experienced workers were recruited to push/empty construction gondolas with and without a Back-Support EXO, HeroWear Apex. Three workers were recruited to install/remove wooden blocks between steel studs with and without two Arm-Support EXOs, i.e., Ekso EVO and Hilti EXO-001. Their motions, postures, heart rates, and task completion times were recorded and compared. The workers were also surveyed to gather their attitudes toward the EXO’s usefulness and ease of use. The study results demonstrated that the workers responded to the use of EXOs differently and consequently were not unanimously in favor of EXO adoption in practice. The preliminary results and findings from this pilot study help in building a foundation of understanding to improve EXO products to fit the needs of construction workers and foster EXO-enabled construction tasks in the future.
-
more » « less
Abstract Background As the sustainability of the agricultural workforce has been threatened by the high prevalence of back pain, developing effective interventions to reduce its burden within farming will contribute to the long‐term health and productivity of workers. Passive back‐support exoskeletons are being explored as an intervention to reduce the physical demands on the back muscles, and consequently mitigate the risk of back pain, in many industrial sectors.
Methods This study investigated whether exoskeleton use could reduce farmers' low back muscle load. Electromyography was used to evaluate exoskeleton use in field and laboratory settings. A total of 14 farmers (13 males and 1 female) with a mean age of 49 (
SD = 12) years and 6 female nonfarmers (mean age 28,SD = 5 years) performed a standardized set of tasks that included symmetric and asymmetric lifting and sustained trunk flexion. Following the standardized tasks, 14 farmers also performed regular, real‐world, farm tasks with and without use of the exoskeleton at their farms.Results Exoskeleton use decreased back muscular load during farming activities up to 65%, 56%, and 48% in static, median, and peak muscle activity, respectively. This indicates potential benefits of exoskeleton use to help farmers work under less muscular load. Paradoxically, exoskeleton use during standardized tasks increased muscle activity for some participants.
Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential effects of using passive exoskeletons in agriculture through observational and experimental research, and is among the first that explores the potential for using exoskeletons during actual work tasks in farm settings.
-
Passive trunk exoskeletons support the human body with mechanical elements like springs and trunk compression, allowing them to guide motion and relieve the load on the spine. However, to provide appropriate support, elements of the exoskeleton (e.g., degree of compression) should be intelligently adapted to the current task. As it is not currently clear how adjusting different exoskeleton elements affects the wearer, this study preliminarily examines the effects of simultaneously adjusting both exoskeletal spinal column stiffness and trunk compression in a passive trunk exoskeleton. Six participants performed four dynamic tasks (walking, sit-to-stand, lifting a 20-lb box, lifting a 40-lb box) and experienced unexpected perturbations both without the exoskeleton and in six exoskeleton configurations corresponding to two compression levels and three stiffness levels. While results are preliminary due to the small sample size and relatively small increases in stiffness, they indicate that both compression and stiffness may affect kinematics and electromyography, that the effects may differ between activities, and that there may be interaction effects between stiffness and compression. As the next step, we will conduct a larger study with the same protocol more participants and larger stiffness increases to systematically evaluate the effects of different exoskeleton characteristics on the wearer.Clinical Relevance- Trunk exoskeletons can support wearers during a variety of different tasks, but their configuration may need to be intelligently adjusted to provide appropriate support. This pilot study provides information about the effects of exoskeleton back stiffness and trunk compression on the wearer, which can be used as a basis for more effective device design and usage.more » « less
-
more » « less
We investigated how novices’ perception of exoskeleton usefulness changes with different types of exposure to an exoskeleton; and when the biomechanical benefits and limitations of potential exoskeleton use are presented to them. Twenty young, healthy participants completed this study. The three types of informational exposures to a back-support exoskeleton (BSE) were: (1) Information-based, (2) Virtual Reality (VR)-based, and (3) hands-on experience (lifting a box using the BSE), where users virtually and physically completed various lifting/lowering tasks set at shoulder, waist, and ankle heights in symmetric and asymmetric positions. After every trial in each exposure, perceived usefulness was obtained. Overall, perceived usefulness ratings generally varied with major task variables (load, lift height, and trunk angle). The VR-based exposure appeared to clarify the specific circumstances under which the BSE was perceived to be useful and reduced extreme biases (positive or negative) that individuals may have developed prior to trying on a BSE.
