skip to main content


Title: NEW PHYLOGENY OF LITOPTERNA AND “ARCHAIC” PALEOGENE UNGULATES ENLIGHTENS THE INTERFAMILIARY AFFINITIES WITHIN THE ORDER
South American Ungulates (SANUs) exhibit astonishing morphological and ecological diversity due to their almost complete isolation during their early evolution. This unique diversity coupled with the limited fossil record of their earliest evolution makes it difficult to establish their phylogenetic position within the placental mammal tree. Litopterna is the second most diverse order of SANUs after only Notoungulata, with species ranging from the middle Paleocene (~63 Ma) to the late Pleistocene. Among SANUs, litopterns are characterized by having cursorial limbs similar to Holarctic groups like Perissodactyla. Currently there are 67 genera of litopterns grouped into nine families, and the affinities of the Paleogene families remain unclear. Furthermore, it is unclear how litopterns are related to older groups of “archaic” Paleogene ungulates of South America (Kollpaninae and Didolodontidae) and North America (e.g., Mioclaenidae), and other SANUs. To test the phylogenetic relationships of Litopterna, we assembled a new morphological matrix with ~1000 craniodental and postcranial characters for 79 taxa. The data were subjected to Bayesian and maximum parsimony analyses. We conducted tip-dated and undated Bayesian analyses using a Mk + G model of morphological evolution. Fifty percent majority rule consensus trees were obtained from the sampled trees from each analysis. The parsimony analysis resulted in ten most parsimonious trees and a strict consensus was computed. The consensus trees derived from the different analyses were largely congruent. A traditional monophyletic Litopterna failed to be recovered as Protolipternidae was closely related to Didolodontidae. Litopterna was found more closely related to Kollpaninae than to North American Mioclaenidae, and Kollpaninae did not form a monophyletic group with the latter. Adianthidae and Indaleciidae were found in a relatively basal position within Litopterna. Macraucheniidae was found as a sister group to Proterotheriidae, whereas Anisolambdidae was the sister group of Sparnotheriodontidae, these four families forming a monophyletic group. By utilizing a more comprehensive approach, these results alter previous conceptions of the intrafamilial affinities within Litopterna and their position among other Paleogene ungulates, shedding new light on how litopterns evolved and diversified during the Paleogene of South America. Funding Sources ANID-PFCHA-Doctorado en el extranjero Becas Chile-2018-72190003, ERC starting grant PalM 756226, NSF DEB 1654949 and 1654952  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1654952
NSF-PAR ID:
10480926
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Society of Vertebrate Paleontology
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of vertebrate paleontology
ISSN:
1937-2809
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. It is now well established that the end-Cretaceous mass extinction had enormous repercussions for mammalian evolution. Following the extinction, during the Paleocene, mammals started to radiate, occupying new and diverse ecological niches. However, the phylogenetic relationships between the socalled “archaic” mammals of this time, and their position within Placentalia, remain contentious. The Periptychidae are a clade of distinctive “archaic” ungulates, composed of ~17 genera of small to large bodied, highly bunodont, terrestrial herbivores that were among the first placental mammals to appear after the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Although the Periptychidae has been historically considered a distinctive “condylarth” subgroup, their higherlevel relationships have been rarely tested. Here, we present an inclusive cladistic analysis to determine and test the phylogenetic affinities of Periptychidae and other key Paleocene groups within Placentalia under different cladistic optimality criteria. We scored 140 taxa for 503 dental, cranial and postcranial characters, incorporating new morphological and taxonomic data. The data were then subject to parsimony and Bayesian tree of morphological evolution, running 5000000 generations with samples every 200 generations and discarding 25% of the samples as burn-in. Stationarity was achieved and a 50 percent majority rule consensus tree from the sampled trees was obtained. The parsimony analysis recovered 48 most parsimonious trees. The two consensus trees derived from the different analyses are largely congruent and recover a monophyletic Periptychidae, although the parsimony consensus tree is better resolved. These results are consistent with simulation studies showing that parsimony tends to be more precise (more nodes reconstructed) than Bayesian analyses, although less accurate. The main topological differences between the results relate to the position of poorly known Puercan (earliest Paleocene) species. Our results affirm the monophyly of Periptychidae and its nesting within a group of “condylarths” positioned at the base of Laurasiatheria and closely related to Artiodactyla. Within Periptychidae we found support for the three major subfamilial divisions in both analyses. These results highlight the importance of using different optimality criteria when resolving a phylogeny and provide a new insight into how placental mammals were evolving after the end-Cretaceous extinction. Grant Information: CONICYT PFCHA/DOCTORADO BECAS CHILE/2018, European Research Council Starting Grant (ERC StG 2017, 756226, PalM), National Science Foundation (NSF EAR 1654952, DEB 1654949) 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Caimaninae is one of the few crocodylian lineages that still has living representatives. Today, most of its six extant species are restricted to South and Central America. However, recent discoveries have revealed a more complex evolutionary history, with a fossil record richer than previously thought and a possible North American origin. Among the oldest caimanines isEocaiman cavernensis, from the Eocene of Patagonia, Argentina. It was described by George G. Simpson in the 1930s, representing the first caimanine reported for the Palaeogene. Since then,E. cavernensishas been ubiquitous in phylogenetic studies on the group, but a more detailed morphological description and revision of the taxon were lacking. Here, we present a reassessment ofE. cavernensis, based on first‐hand examination and micro‐computed tomography of the holotype, and reinterpret different aspects of its morphology. We explore the phylogenetic affinities ofE. cavernensisand other caimanines using parsimony and Bayesian inference approaches. Our results provide evidence for a monophyleticEocaimangenus within Caimaninae, even though some highly incomplete taxa (including the congenericEocaiman itaboraiensis) represent significant sources of phylogenetic instability. We also foundCulebrasuchus mesoamericanusas sister to all other caimanines and the North American globidontans (i.e.Brachychampsaand closer relatives) outside Caimaninae. A time‐calibrated tree, obtained using a fossilized birth–death model, shows a possible Campanian origin for the group (76.97 ± 6.7 Ma), which is older than the age estimated using molecular data, and suggests that the earliest cladogenetic events of caimanines took place rapidly and across the K–Pg boundary.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Next‐generation sequencing technologies (NGS) allow systematists to amass a wealth of genomic data from non‐model species for phylogenetic resolution at various temporal scales. However, phylogenetic inference for many lineages dominated by non‐model species has not yet benefited from NGS, which can complement Sanger sequencing studies. One such lineage, whose phylogenetic relationships remain uncertain, is the diverse, agriculturally important and charismatic Coreoidea (Hemiptera: Heteroptera). Given the lack of consensus on higher‐level relationships and the importance of a robust phylogeny for evolutionary hypothesis testing, we use a large data set comprised of hundreds of ultraconserved element (UCE) loci to infer the phylogeny of Coreoidea (excluding Stenocephalidae and Hyocephalidae), with emphasis on the families Coreidae and Alydidae. We generated three data sets by including alignments that contained loci sampled for at least 50%, 60%, or 70% of the total taxa, and inferred phylogeny using maximum likelihood and summary coalescent methods. Twenty‐six external morphological features used in relatively comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of coreoids were also re‐evaluated within our molecular phylogenetic framework. We recovered 439–970 loci per species (16%–36% of loci targeted) and combined this with previously generated UCE data for 12 taxa. All data sets, regardless of analytical approach, yielded topologically similar and strongly supported trees, with the exception of outgroup relationships and the position of Hydarinae. We recovered a monophyletic Coreoidea, with Rhopalidae highly supported as the sister group to Alydidae + Coreidae. Neither Alydidae nor Coreidae were monophyletic; the coreid subfamilies Hydarinae and Pseudophloeinae were recovered as more closely related to Alydidae than to other coreid subfamilies. Coreinae were paraphyletic with respect to Meropachyinae. Most morphological traits were homoplastic with several clades defined by few, if any, synapomorphies. Our results demonstrate the utility of phylogenomic approaches in generating robust hypotheses for taxa with long‐standing phylogenetic problems and highlight that novel insights may come from such approaches.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Neuroptera (lacewings) and allied orders Megaloptera (dobsonflies, alderflies) and Raphidioptera (snakeflies) are predatory insects and together make up the clade Neuropterida. The higher‐level relationships within Neuropterida have historically been widely disputed with multiple competing hypotheses. Moreover, the evolution of important biological innovations among various Neuropterida families, such as the origin, timing and direction of transitions between aquatic and terrestrial habitats of larvae, remains poorly understood. To investigate the origin and diversification of lacewings and their allies, we undertook phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial genomes of all families of Neuropterida using Bayesian inference, maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony methods. We present a robust, fully resolved phylogeny and divergence time estimation for Neuropterida with strong statistical support for almost all nodes. Mitochondrial sequence data are typified by significant compositional heterogeneity across lineages, and parsimony and models assuming homogeneous rates did not recover Neuroptera as monophyletic. Only a model accounting for compositional heterogeneity (i.e.CATGTR) recovered all orders of Neuropterida as monophyletic. Significant findings of the mitogenomic phylogeny include recovering Raphidioptera as sister to Megaloptera plus Neuroptera. The sister family of all other lacewings are the dusty‐wings (Coniopterygidae), rather than Nevrorthidae. Nevrorthidae are instead returned to their traditional position as the sister group of the spongilla‐flies (Sisyridae) and closely related to Osmylidae. Our divergence time analysis indicates that the Mesozoic was indeed a ‘golden age’ for lacewings, with most families of Neuropterida diverging during the Triassic and Jurassic and all extant families present by the Early Cretaceous. Based on ancestral character state reconstructions of larval habitat we evaluate competing hypotheses regarding the life style of early neuropteridan larvae as either aquatic or terrestrial.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract— Physarieae is a small tribe of herbaceous annual and woody perennial mustards that are mostly endemic to North America, with its members including a large amount of variation in floral, fruit, and chromosomal variation. Building on a previous study of Physarieae based on morphology and ndhF plastid DNA, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of the tribe using new sequence data from two nuclear markers, and compared the new topologies against previously published cpDNA-based phylogenetic hypotheses. The novel analyses included ca. 420 new sequences of ITS and LUMINIDEPENDENS ( LD ) markers for 39 and 47 species, respectively, with sampling accounting for all seven genera of Physarieae, including nomenclatural type species, and 11 outgroup taxa. Maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian analyses showed that these additional markers were largely consistent with the previous ndh F data that supported the monophyly of Physarieae and resolved two major clades within the tribe, i.e., DDNLS ( Dithyrea , Dimorphocarpa , Nerisyrenia , Lyrocarpa , and Synthlipsis ) and PP ( Paysonia and Physaria ). New analyses also increased internal resolution for some closely related species and lineages within both clades. The monophyly of Dithyrea and the sister relationship of Paysonia to Physaria was consistent in all trees, with the sister relationship of Nerisyrenia to Lyrocarpa supported by ndhF and ITS, and the positions of Dimorphocarpa and Synthlipsis shifted within the DDNLS Clade depending on the employed data set. Finally, using the strong, new phylogenetic framework of combined cpDNA + nDNA data, we discussed standing hypotheses of trichome evolution in the tribe suggested by ndhF . 
    more » « less