Abstract Climate change is expected to exacerbate the urban heat island (UHI) effect in cities worldwide, increasing the risk of heat-related morbidity and mortality. Solar reflective ‘cool pavement’ is one of several mitigation strategies that may counteract the negative effects of the UHI effect. An increase in pavement albedo results in less heat absorption, which results in reduced surface temperatures ( T surface ). Near surface air temperatures ( T air ) could also be reduced if cool pavements are deployed at sufficiently large spatial scales, though this has never been confirmed by field measurements. This field study is the first to conduct controlled measurements of the impacts of neighborhood-scale cool pavement installations. We measured the impacts of cool pavement on albedo, T surface , and T air . In addition, pavement albedo was monitored after installation to assess its degradation over time. The field site (∼0.64 km 2 ) was located in Covina, California; ∼30 km east of Downtown Los Angeles. We found that an average pavement albedo increase of 0.18 (from 0.08 to 0.26) corresponded to maximum neighborhood averaged T surface and T air reductions of 5 °C and 0.2 °C, respectively. Maximum T surface reductions were observed in the afternoon, while minimum reductions of 0.9 °C were observed in the morning. T air reductions were detected at 12:00 local standard time (LST), and from 20:00 LST to 22:59 LST, suggesting that cool pavement decreases T air during the daytime as well as in the evening. An average albedo reduction of 30% corresponded to a ∼1 °C reduction in the T surface cooling efficacy. Although we present here the first measured T air reductions due to cool pavement, we emphasize that the tradeoffs between T air reductions and reflected shortwave radiation increases are still unclear and warrant further investigation in order to holistically assess the efficacy of cool pavements, especially with regards to pedestrian thermal comfort.
more »
« less
Albedo as a Competing Warming Effect of Urban Greening
Urban greening is often proposed for urban heat island (UHI) mitigation because vegetation provides shade and increases evapotranspiration. However, vegetation has lower albedo and higher emissivity than the bare soil it often replaces, which increases incoming energy fluxes. Here, we use the Weather Research and Forecasting model to quantify and compare the albedo and non‐albedo effects (i.e., changes in emissivity, surface roughness, and evaporative fluxes) of urban greening in the Los Angeles Basin under policy relevant urban greening scenarios. When albedo‐induced effects were included in the model, daytime surface temperatures in urban areas warmed by 0.70 ± 0.89°C with increases in the sensible heat flux outweighing increases in the latent heat flux from increased evapotranspiration. In contrast, daytime surface temperatures cooled by 0.27 ± 0.72°C when the albedo‐induced effects were ignored. At night, including albedo‐induced effects of urban greening resulted in only half the cooling modeled in the non‐albedo simulations. Near surface air temperatures also had contrasting model results, with nighttime cooling of 0.21 ± 0.47°C outweighing slight daytime warming of 0.04 ± 0.32°C in the non‐albedo simulations and daytime warming of 0.33 ± 0.41°C outweighing slight nighttime cooling of 0.05 ± 0.46°C in the albedo simulations. Our results reveal the critical role that albedo plays in determining the net surface climate effects of urban greening. Reductions in albedo from urban greening should be carefully considered by policy makers and urban planners, especially as high albedo roofs and pavements are simultaneously being deployed for UHI mitigation in many cities.
more » « less- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10481889
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Volume:
- 128
- Issue:
- 24
- ISSN:
- 2169-897X
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
more » « less
Abstract Land‐use/cover change (LUCC) is an important driver of environmental change, occurring at the same time as, and often interacting with, global climate change. Reforestation and deforestation have been critical aspects of LUCC over the past two centuries and are widely studied for their potential to perturb the global carbon cycle. More recently, there has been keen interest in understanding the extent to which reforestation affects terrestrial energy cycling and thus surface temperature directly by altering surface physical properties (e.g., albedo and emissivity) and land–atmosphere energy exchange. The impacts of reforestation on land surface temperature and their mechanisms are relatively well understood in tropical and boreal climates, but the effects of reforestation on warming and/or cooling in temperate zones are less certain. This study is designed to elucidate the biophysical mechanisms that link land cover and surface temperature in temperate ecosystems. To achieve this goal, we used data from six paired eddy‐covariance towers over co‐located forests and grasslands in the temperate eastern United States, where radiation components, latent and sensible heat fluxes, and meteorological conditions were measured. The results show that, at the annual time scale, the surface of the forests is 1–2°C cooler than grasslands, indicating a substantial cooling effect of reforestation. The enhanced latent and sensible heat fluxes of forests have an average cooling effect of −2.5°C, which offsets the net warming effect (+1.5°C) of albedo warming (+2.3°C) and emissivity cooling effect (−0.8°C) associated with surface properties. Additional daytime cooling over forests is driven by local feedbacks to incoming radiation. We further show that the forest cooling effect is most pronounced when land surface temperature is higher, often exceeding −5°C. Our results contribute important observational evidence that reforestation in the temperate zone offers opportunities for local climate mitigation and adaptation.
-
null (Ed.)Abstract This study investigates the potential effects of historical deforestation in South America using a regional climate model driven with reanalysis data. Two different sources of data were used to quantify deforestation during the 1980s to 2010s, leading to two scenarios of forest loss: smaller but spatially continuous in scenario 1 and larger but spatially scattered in scenario 2. The model simulates a generally warmer and drier local climate following deforestation. Vegetation canopy becomes warmer due to reduced canopy evapotranspiration, and ground becomes warmer due to more radiation reaching the ground. The warming signal for surface air is weaker than for ground and vegetation, likely due to reduced surface roughness suppressing the sensible heat flux. For surface air over deforested areas, the warming signal is stronger for the nighttime minimum temperature and weaker or even becomes a cooling signal for the daytime maximum temperature, due to the strong radiative effects of albedo at midday, which reduces the diurnal amplitude of temperature. The drying signals over deforested areas include lower atmospheric humidity, less precipitation, and drier soil. The model identifies the La Plata basin as a region remotely influenced by deforestation, where a simulated increase of precipitation leads to wetter soil, higher ET, and a strong surface cooling. Over both deforested and remote areas, the deforestation-induced surface climate changes are much stronger in scenario 2 than scenario 1; coarse-resolution data and models (such as in scenario 1) cannot represent the detailed spatial structure of deforestation and underestimate its impact on local and regional climates.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Cool materials and rooftop vegetation help achieve urban heating mitigation as they can reduce building cooling demands. This study assesses the cooling potential of different mitigation technologies using Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)- taking case of a tropical coastal climate in the Kolkata Metropolitan Area. The model was validated using data from six meteorological sites. The cooling potential of eight mitigation scenarios was evaluated for: three cool roofs, four green roofs, and their combination (cool-city). The sensible heat, latent heat, heat storage, 2-m ambient temperature, surface temperature, air temperature, roof temperature, and urban canopy temperature was calculated. The effects on the urban boundary layer were also investigated.
The different scenarios reduced the daytime temperature of various urban components, and the effect varied nearly linearly with increasing albedo and green roof fractions. For example, the maximum ambient temperature decreased by 3.6 °C, 0.9 °C, and 1.4 °C for a cool roof with 85% albedo, 100% rooftop vegetation, and their combination.
The cost of different mitigation scenarios was assumed to depend on the construction options, location, and market prices. The potential for price per square meter and corresponding temperature decreased was related to one another. Recognizing the complex relationship between scenarios and construction options, the reduction in the maximum and minimum temperature across different cool and green roof cases were used for developing the cost estimates. This estimate thus attempted a summary of the price per degree of cooling for the different potential technologies.
Higher green fraction, cool materials, and their combination generally reduced winds and enhanced buoyancy. The surface changes alter the lower atmospheric dynamics such as low-level vertical mixing and a shallower boundary layer and weakened horizontal convective rolls during afternoon hours. Although cool materials offer the highest temperature reductions, the cooling resulting from its combination and a green roof strategy could mitigate or reverse the summertime heat island effect. The results highlight the possibilities for heat mitigation and offer insight into the different strategies and costs for mitigating the urban heating and cooling demands.
-
more » « less
Abstract Cities are simultaneously implementing urban greening and reducing anthropogenic emissions to combat climate change, but these strategies can have complex and potentially counteracting effects on regional atmospheric chemistry. Urban greening can increase emissions of volatile organic compounds (BVOCs), while climate change mitigation strategies reduce co‐emitted pollutants such as nitrogen oxides (NOx). The nonlinear relationship between ozone (O3) and BVOC and NOxconcentrations makes it crucial to investigate potential interactions between urban greening and anthropogenic emissions reductions. Here, we use regional atmospheric chemistry modeling to assess O3sensitivity to a 50% increase in urban vegetation in the Los Angeles Basin. We evaluated potential interactions between urban greening and climate change mitigation by running urban greening simulations with current day and future anthropogenic emissions that reflect renewable energy adoption and electrification in Los Angeles, CA. Our model results show that urban greening increased daily maximum 8‐hr ozone concentrations with higher increases modeled under current day anthropogenic emissions. Urban greening had complex effects on hourly O3concentrations, with increased O3concentrations up to 0.95 ppb during the day following increased biogenic emissions and reduced urban O3concentrations up to 0.41 ppb at night following reduced ventilation of NOx. Under the future anthropogenic emissions scenario, reductions in NOxsomewhat mitigated the daytime O3penalties of urban greening but also dampened nighttime O3reductions. Our results suggest that urban greening will likely have regional O3penalties if new vegetation is high isoprene emitting, even as NOxemissions are drastically reduced following climate change mitigation.
